IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i21p5287-d1505584.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of Biohydrogen Production by Tetraselmis subcordiformis During Cultivation Using Soil-Less Agricultural Wastewater and Effluent from Microbial Fuel Cells

Author

Listed:
  • Marcin Zieliński

    (Department of Environment Engineering, Faculty of Geoengineering, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Str. Oczapowskiego 5, 10-719 Olsztyn, Poland)

  • Łukasz Barczak

    (Department of Environment Engineering, Faculty of Geoengineering, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Str. Oczapowskiego 5, 10-719 Olsztyn, Poland)

  • Paulina Rusanowska

    (Department of Environment Engineering, Faculty of Geoengineering, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Str. Oczapowskiego 5, 10-719 Olsztyn, Poland)

  • Joanna Kazimierowicz

    (Department of Water Supply and Sewage Systems, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Environmental Sciences, Bialystok University of Technology, 15-351 Bialystok, Poland)

  • Marcin Dębowski

    (Department of Environment Engineering, Faculty of Geoengineering, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Str. Oczapowskiego 5, 10-719 Olsztyn, Poland)

Abstract

The development and implementation of innovative production technologies have a direct influence on the creation of new sources of pollution and types of waste. An example of this is the wastewater from soil-less agriculture and the effluent from microbial fuel cells. An important topic is the development and application of methods for their neutralisation that take into account the assumptions of global environmental policy. The aim of the present study was to determine the possibilities of utilising this type of pollution in the process of autotrophic cultivation of the biohydrogen-producing microalgae Tetraselmis subcordiformis . The highest biomass concentration of 3030 ± 183 mgVS/L and 67.9 ± 3.5 mg chl-a/L was observed when the culture medium was wastewater from soil-less agriculture. The growth rate in the logarithmic growth phase was 270 ± 16 mgVS/L-day and 5.95 ± 0.24 mg chl-a/L-day. In the same scenario, the highest total H 2 production of 161 ± 8 mL was also achieved, with an observed H 2 production rate of 4.67 ± 0.23 mL/h. Significantly lower effects in terms of biomass production of T. subcordiformis and H 2 yield were observed when fermented dairy wastewater from the anode chamber of the microbial fuel cell was added to the culture medium.

Suggested Citation

  • Marcin Zieliński & Łukasz Barczak & Paulina Rusanowska & Joanna Kazimierowicz & Marcin Dębowski, 2024. "Comparison of Biohydrogen Production by Tetraselmis subcordiformis During Cultivation Using Soil-Less Agricultural Wastewater and Effluent from Microbial Fuel Cells," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-15, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:21:p:5287-:d:1505584
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/21/5287/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/21/5287/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Kwame Amenorfenyo & Xianghu Huang & Yulei Zhang & Qitao Zeng & Ning Zhang & Jiajia Ren & Qiang Huang, 2019. "Microalgae Brewery Wastewater Treatment: Potentials, Benefits and the Challenges," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-19, May.
    2. Marcin Dębowski & Magda Dudek & Joanna Kazimierowicz & Piera Quattrocelli & Paulina Rusanowska & Łukasz Barczak & Anna Nowicka & Marcin Zieliński, 2024. "Analysis of Multi-Biofuel Production during Cultivation of the Green Microalga Tetraselmis subscordiformis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-20, July.
    3. Magda Dudek & Marcin Dębowski & Joanna Kazimierowicz & Marcin Zieliński & Piera Quattrocelli & Anna Nowicka, 2022. "The Cultivation of Biohydrogen-Producing Tetraselmis subcordiformis Microalgae as the Third Stage of Dairy Wastewater Aerobic Treatment System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-17, September.
    4. Artur Mielcarek & Karolina Kłobukowska & Joanna Rodziewicz & Wojciech Janczukowicz & Kamil Łukasz Bryszewski, 2023. "Water Nutrient Management in Soilless Plant Cultivation versus Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-20, December.
    5. Marcin Zieliński & Paulina Rusanowska & Magda Dudek & Adam Starowicz & Łukasz Barczak & Marcin Dębowski, 2024. "Efficiency of Photosynthetic Microbial Fuel Cells (pMFC) Depending on the Type of Microorganisms Inhabiting the Cathode Chamber," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-14, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:caa:jnlswr:v:preprint:id:66-2023-swr is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Sekoai, Patrick T. & Chunilall, Viren & Msele, Kwanele & Buthelezi, Lindiswa & Johakimu, Jonas & Andrew, Jerome & Zungu, Manqoba & Moloantoa, Karabelo & Maningi, Nontuthuko & Habimana, Olivier & Swart, 2023. "Biowaste biorefineries in South Africa: Current status, opportunities, and research and development needs," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    3. German Smetana & Anna Grosser, 2024. "The Application of an Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket Reactor in the Treatment of Brewery and Dairy Wastewater: A Critical Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-30, March.
    4. Amin Mojiri & Maedeh Baharlooeian & Mohammad Ali Zahed, 2021. "The Potential of Chaetoceros muelleri in Bioremediation of Antibiotics: Performance and Optimization," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-12, January.
    5. Maria G. Savvidou & Pavlos K. Pandis & Diomi Mamma & Georgia Sourkouni & Christos Argirusis, 2022. "Organic Waste Substrates for Bioenergy Production via Microbial Fuel Cells: A Key Point Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-53, August.
    6. Ifeanyi Michael Smarte Anekwe & Yusuf Makarfi Isa, 2024. "Application of biostimulation and bioventing system as bioremediation strategy for the treatment of crude oil contaminated soils," Soil and Water Research, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 19(2), pages 100-110.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:21:p:5287-:d:1505584. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.