IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i3p977-d485540.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Potential of Chaetoceros muelleri in Bioremediation of Antibiotics: Performance and Optimization

Author

Listed:
  • Amin Mojiri

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Graduate School of Advanced Science and Engineering, Hiroshima University, Higashihiroshima 739-8527, Japan
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Maedeh Baharlooeian

    (Department of Marine Biology, Faculty of Marine Science and Oceanography, Khorramshahr University of Marine Science and Technology, Khorramshahr 64199-34619, Iran
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Mohammad Ali Zahed

    (Faculty of Biological Sciences, Kharazmi University, Tehran 15719-14911, Iran)

Abstract

Antibiotics are frequently applied to treat bacterial infections in humans and animals. However, most consumed antibiotics are excreted into wastewater as metabolites or in their original form. Therefore, removal of antibiotics from aquatic environments is of high research interest. In this study, we investigated the removal of sulfamethoxazole (SMX) and ofloxacin (OFX) with Chaetoceros muelleri , a marine diatom. The optimization process was conducted using response surface methodology (RSM) with two independent parameters, i.e., the initial concentration of antibiotics and contact time. The optimum removal of SMX and OFX were 39.8% (0.19 mg L −1 ) and 42.5% (0.21 mg L −1 ) at the initial concentration (0.5 mg L −1 ) and contact time (6.3 days). Apart from that, the toxicity effect of antibiotics on the diatom was monitored in different SMX and OFX concentrations (0 to 50 mg L −1 ). The protein (mg L −1 ) and carotenoid (μg L −1 ) content increased when the antibiotic concentration increased up to 20 mg L −1 , while cell viability was not significantly affected up to 20 mg L −1 of antibiotic concentration. Protein content, carotenoid, and cell viability decreased during high antibiotic concentrations (more than 20 to 30 mg L −1 ). This study revealed that the use of Chaetoceros muelleri is an appealing solution to remove certain antibiotics from wastewater.

Suggested Citation

  • Amin Mojiri & Maedeh Baharlooeian & Mohammad Ali Zahed, 2021. "The Potential of Chaetoceros muelleri in Bioremediation of Antibiotics: Performance and Optimization," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-12, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:3:p:977-:d:485540
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/3/977/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/3/977/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Kwame Amenorfenyo & Xianghu Huang & Yulei Zhang & Qitao Zeng & Ning Zhang & Jiajia Ren & Qiang Huang, 2019. "Microalgae Brewery Wastewater Treatment: Potentials, Benefits and the Challenges," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-19, May.
    2. Bingbing Du & Qingxiang Yang & Ruifei Wang & Ruimin Wang & Qiang Wang & Yuan Xin, 2019. "Evolution of Antibiotic Resistance and the Relationship between the Antibiotic Resistance Genes and Microbial Compositions under Long-Term Exposure to Tetracycline and Sulfamethoxazole," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-15, November.
    3. Amirreza Talaiekhozani & Sahar Joudaki & Farhad Banisharif & Zeinab Eskandari & Jinwoo Cho & Ghasem Moghadam & Shahabaldin Rezania, 2020. "Comparison of Azithromycin Removal from Water Using UV Radiation, Fe (VI) Oxidation Process and ZnO Nanoparticles," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-17, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Abdullah Kaviani Rad & Angelika Astaykina & Rostislav Streletskii & Yeganeh Afsharyzad & Hassan Etesami & Mehdi Zarei & Siva K. Balasundram, 2022. "An Overview of Antibiotic Resistance and Abiotic Stresses Affecting Antimicrobial Resistance in Agricultural Soils," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-27, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:caa:jnlswr:v:preprint:id:66-2023-swr is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Sekoai, Patrick T. & Chunilall, Viren & Msele, Kwanele & Buthelezi, Lindiswa & Johakimu, Jonas & Andrew, Jerome & Zungu, Manqoba & Moloantoa, Karabelo & Maningi, Nontuthuko & Habimana, Olivier & Swart, 2023. "Biowaste biorefineries in South Africa: Current status, opportunities, and research and development needs," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    3. Marcin Zieliński & Łukasz Barczak & Paulina Rusanowska & Joanna Kazimierowicz & Marcin Dębowski, 2024. "Comparison of Biohydrogen Production by Tetraselmis subcordiformis During Cultivation Using Soil-Less Agricultural Wastewater and Effluent from Microbial Fuel Cells," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-15, October.
    4. German Smetana & Anna Grosser, 2024. "The Application of an Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket Reactor in the Treatment of Brewery and Dairy Wastewater: A Critical Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-30, March.
    5. Maria G. Savvidou & Pavlos K. Pandis & Diomi Mamma & Georgia Sourkouni & Christos Argirusis, 2022. "Organic Waste Substrates for Bioenergy Production via Microbial Fuel Cells: A Key Point Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-53, August.
    6. Xuexia Yuan & Yong Zhang & Chenxi Sun & Wenbo Wang & Yuanjuan Wu & Lixia Fan & Bing Liu, 2022. "Profile of Bacterial Community and Antibiotic Resistance Genes in Typical Vegetable Greenhouse Soil," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-15, June.
    7. Ifeanyi Michael Smarte Anekwe & Yusuf Makarfi Isa, 2024. "Application of biostimulation and bioventing system as bioremediation strategy for the treatment of crude oil contaminated soils," Soil and Water Research, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 19(2), pages 100-110.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:3:p:977-:d:485540. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.