IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i19p4952-d1491644.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Charging of an Air–Rock Bed Thermal Energy Storage under Natural and Forced Convection

Author

Listed:
  • Ashenafi Kebedom Abrha

    (School of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, EiT-M, Mekelle University, Mekelle 231, Ethiopia)

  • Mebrahtu Kidanu Teklehaymanot

    (School of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, EiT-M, Mekelle University, Mekelle 231, Ethiopia)

  • Mulu Bayray Kahsay

    (School of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, EiT-M, Mekelle University, Mekelle 231, Ethiopia
    Department of Energy and Process Engineering, NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway)

  • Ole Jørgen Nydal

    (Department of Energy and Process Engineering, NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway)

Abstract

An air-rock bed thermal storage system was designed for small-scale powered generation and analyzed with computational fluid dynamics (CFD) using ANSYS-Fluent simulation. An experimental system was constructed to compare and validate the simulation model results. The storage unit is a cylindrical steel container with granite rock pebbles as a storage medium. The CFD simulation used a porous flow model. Transient-state simulations were performed on a 2D axisymmetric model using a pressure-based solver. During charging, heat input that keeps the bottom temperature at 550 °C was applied to raise the storage temperature. Performance analysis was conducted under various porosities, considering natural and forced convection. The natural convection analysis showed insignificant convection contribution after 10 h of charging, as observed in both average air velocity and the temperature profile plots. The temperature distribution profiles at various positions for both convection modes showed good agreement between the simulation and experimental results. Additionally, both cases exhibited similar temperature growth trends, further validating the models. Forced convection reduced the charging time from 60 h to 5 h to store 70 MJ of energy at a porosity of 0.4, compared to natural convection, which stored only 50 MJ in the same time. This extended charging period was attributed to poor natural convective heat transfer, indicating that relying solely on natural convection for thermal energy storage under the given conditions is not practical. Using a small fan to enhance heat transfer, forced convection is a more practical method for charging the system, making it suitable for power generation applications.

Suggested Citation

  • Ashenafi Kebedom Abrha & Mebrahtu Kidanu Teklehaymanot & Mulu Bayray Kahsay & Ole Jørgen Nydal, 2024. "Charging of an Air–Rock Bed Thermal Energy Storage under Natural and Forced Convection," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-19, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:19:p:4952-:d:1491644
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/19/4952/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/19/4952/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sunku Prasad, J. & Muthukumar, P. & Desai, Fenil & Basu, Dipankar N. & Rahman, Muhammad M., 2019. "A critical review of high-temperature reversible thermochemical energy storage systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sedighi, Mohammadreza & Padilla, Ricardo Vasquez & Alamdari, Pedram & Lake, Maree & Rose, Andrew & Izadgoshasb, Iman & Taylor, Robert A., 2020. "A novel high-temperature (>700 °C), volumetric receiver with a packed bed of transparent and absorbing spheres," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    2. Ding, Zhixiong & Wu, Wei, 2024. "Simulation of a multi-level absorption thermal battery with variable solution flow rate for adjustable cooling capacity," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 301(C).
    3. Mohamed Zbair & Simona Bennici, 2021. "Survey Summary on Salts Hydrates and Composites Used in Thermochemical Sorption Heat Storage: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-33, May.
    4. Xie, Baoshan & Baudin, Nicolas & Soto, Jérôme & Fan, Yilin & Luo, Lingai, 2022. "Wall impact on efficiency of packed-bed thermocline thermal energy storage system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    5. Andrés Carro & Ricardo Chacartegui & Carlos Tejada & Georgios Gravanis & Muhammad Eusha & Voutetakis Spyridon & Papadopoulou Simira & Carlos Ortiz, 2021. "FMEA and Risks Assessment for Thermochemical Energy Storage Systems Based on Carbonates," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-20, September.
    6. Ran, Fengming & Chen, Yunkang & Cong, Rongshuai & Fang, Guiyin, 2020. "Flow and heat transfer characteristics of microencapsulated phase change slurry in thermal energy systems: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    7. Chen, Chen & Kong, Mingmin & Zhou, Shuiqing & Sepulveda, Abdon E. & Hong, Hui, 2020. "Energy storage efficiency optimization of methane reforming with CO2 reactors for solar thermochemical energy storage☆," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    8. Lisbona, Pilar & Bailera, Manuel & Hills, Thomas & Sceats, Mark & Díez, Luis I. & Romeo, Luis M., 2020. "Energy consumption minimization for a solar lime calciner operating in a concentrated solar power plant for thermal energy storage," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 1019-1027.
    9. Dai, Renkun & Li, Wei & Mostaghimi, Javad & Wang, Qiuwang & Zeng, Min, 2020. "On the optimal heat source location of partially heated energy storage process using the newly developed simplified enthalpy based lattice Boltzmann method," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    10. Sarah Roger-Lund & Jo Darkwa & Mark Worall & John Calautit & Rabah Boukhanouf, 2024. "A Review of Thermochemical Energy Storage Systems for District Heating in the UK," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-28, July.
    11. Gbenou, Tadagbe Roger Sylvanus & Fopah-Lele, Armand & Wang, Kejian, 2022. "Macroscopic and microscopic investigations of low-temperature thermochemical heat storage reactors: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    12. Guillermo Martinez Castilla & Diana Carolina Guío-Pérez & Stavros Papadokonstantakis & David Pallarès & Filip Johnsson, 2021. "Techno-Economic Assessment of Calcium Looping for Thermochemical Energy Storage with CO 2 Capture," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-17, May.
    13. Carro, A. & Chacartegui, R. & Ortiz, C. & Becerra, J.A., 2022. "Analysis of a thermochemical energy storage system based on the reversible Ca(OH)2/CaO reaction," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PA).
    14. Marín, P.E. & Milian, Y. & Ushak, S. & Cabeza, L.F. & Grágeda, M. & Shire, G.S.F., 2021. "Lithium compounds for thermochemical energy storage: A state-of-the-art review and future trends," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    15. Albahri, O.S. & Alamoodi, A.H. & Deveci, Muhammet & Albahri, A.S. & Mahmoud, Moamin A. & Sharaf, Iman Mohamad & Coffman, D'Maris, 2023. "Multi-perspective evaluation of integrated active cooling systems using fuzzy decision making model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    16. Gang Xiao & Zhide Wang & Dong Ni & Peiwang Zhu, 2023. "Kinetics and Structural Optimization of Cobalt-Oxide Honeycomb Structures Based on Thermochemical Heat Storage," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-19, April.
    17. Yujie Su & Yi Yang & Guoqing He & Renhua Liu & De Ding, 2024. "Two-Stage Solar–NaOH Thermochemical Heat Pump Heating System for Building Heating: Operations Strategies and Theoretical Performance," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-16, April.
    18. Hamza Ayaz & Veerakumar Chinnasamy & Junhyeok Yong & Honghyun Cho, 2021. "Review of Technologies and Recent Advances in Low-Temperature Sorption Thermal Storage Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-36, September.
    19. Ying Yang & Yingjie Li & Xianyao Yan & Jianli Zhao & Chunxiao Zhang, 2021. "Development of Thermochemical Heat Storage Based on CaO/CaCO 3 Cycles: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-26, October.
    20. Bruce J. Hardy & Claudio Corgnale & Stephanie N. Gamble, 2021. "Operating Characteristics of Metal Hydride-Based Solar Energy Storage Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-14, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:19:p:4952-:d:1491644. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.