IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i19p4934-d1491004.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the Sustainability Reporting Transparency and Engagement of European Energy Companies

Author

Listed:
  • Ana Zrnic

    (Faculty of Economics and Business in Osijek, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Trg Ljudevita Gaja 7, HR-31000 Osijek, Croatia)

  • Dubravka Pekanov

    (Faculty of Economics and Business in Osijek, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Trg Ljudevita Gaja 7, HR-31000 Osijek, Croatia)

  • Djula Borozan

    (Faculty of Economics and Business in Osijek, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Trg Ljudevita Gaja 7, HR-31000 Osijek, Croatia)

Abstract

Energy companies are facing increasing pressure from institutional and industry stakeholders to prioritize their responsibility to the environment and society, including providing accurate, reliable, and comprehensive reports on their sustainability practices. Three metrics were developed in this study: the average sustainability reporting score and two sustainability performance reporting indices based on two different performance measurement methodologies. These were designed to assess the effect of mandatory non-financial disclosure on sustainability reporting and the level of transparency and engagement of energy companies. The study also examined the relationship between the level of sustainability reporting and sustainability performance in the period of 2016–2019 by correlating these metrics. The analysis sheds light on the effectiveness of non-financial disclosure regulations in promoting sustainability practices in the energy industry. The results revealed no difference in metric scores prior to, or even following, the adoption of Directive 2014/95/EU. Energy companies performed better in terms of sustainability when more indicators were reported. Their primary focus was on the economic aspect of sustainability, particularly corruption. They gave less importance to the environmental aspect, mainly reporting on emissions. The social aspect received the least attention, although indicators for employee education and training were mentioned most frequently. The analysis showed that the metrics are statistically significantly correlated and complement each other, highlighting the need to consider a variety of metrics when assessing sustainability performance in the energy industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Ana Zrnic & Dubravka Pekanov & Djula Borozan, 2024. "Assessing the Sustainability Reporting Transparency and Engagement of European Energy Companies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-20, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:19:p:4934-:d:1491004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/19/4934/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/19/4934/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nancy E. Landrum & Brian Ohsowski, 2018. "Identifying Worldviews on Corporate Sustainability: A Content Analysis of Corporate Sustainability Reports," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(1), pages 128-151, January.
    2. Mancini, Lucia & Sala, Serenella, 2018. "Social impact assessment in the mining sector: Review and comparison of indicators frameworks," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 98-111.
    3. Cristian R. Loza Adaui, 2020. "Sustainability Reporting Quality of Peruvian Listed Companies and the Impact of Regulatory Requirements of Sustainability Disclosures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-22, February.
    4. Carol A. Adams, 2002. "Internal organisational factors influencing corporate social and ethical reporting," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 15(2), pages 223-250, May.
    5. Giulio Greco & Nick Sciulli & Giuseppe D'Onza, 2015. "The Influence of Stakeholder Engagement on Sustainability Reporting: Evidence from Italian local councils," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(4), pages 465-488, April.
    6. Patrycja Hąbek & Radosław Wolniak, 2016. "Assessing the quality of corporate social responsibility reports: the case of reporting practices in selected European Union member states," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 50(1), pages 399-420, January.
    7. R. D. Banker & A. Charnes & W. W. Cooper, 1984. "Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(9), pages 1078-1092, September.
    8. Lucia Biondi & John Dumay & David Monciardini, 2020. "Using the International Integrated Reporting Framework to comply with EU Directive 2014/95/EU: can we afford another reporting façade?," Meditari Accountancy Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 28(5), pages 889-914, July.
    9. Krajnc, Damjan & Glavic, Peter, 2005. "How to compare companies on relevant dimensions of sustainability," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(4), pages 551-563, December.
    10. Sartori, Simone & Witjes, Sjors & Campos, Lucila M.S., 2017. "Sustainability performance for Brazilian electricity power industry: An assessment integrating social, economic and environmental issues," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 41-51.
    11. Adams, Carol A. & Frost, Geoffrey R., 2008. "Integrating sustainability reporting into management practices," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 288-302.
    12. Hanna E. Czaja-Cieszyńska & Dominika Kordela, 2023. "Sustainability Reporting in Energy Companies—Is There a Link between Social Disclosures, the Experience and Market Value?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-15, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Salvatore Loprevite & Domenico Raucci & Daniela Rupo, 2020. "KPIs Reporting and Financial Performance in the Transition to Mandatory Disclosure: The Case of Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-24, June.
    2. Waris Ali & Zeeshan Mahmood & Jeffrey Wilson & Hina Ismail, 2024. "The impact of sustainability governance attributes on comprehensive CSR reporting: A developing country setting," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(3), pages 1802-1817, May.
    3. Wei, Wei & Han, Ying & Abedin, Mohammad Zoynul & Ma, Jingjing & Chai, Shanglei, 2023. "Empirical study on the technical efficiency and total factor productivity of power industry: Evidence from Chinese provinces," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    4. Zhang, Ning & Zhao, Yu & Wang, Na, 2022. "Is China's energy policy effective for power plants? Evidence from the 12th Five-Year Plan energy saving targets," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    5. Thomas A. Tsalis & Maria Terzaki & Dimitrios Koulouriotis & Konstantinos P. Tsagarakis & Ioannis E. Nikolaou, 2023. "The nexus of United Nations' 2030 Agenda and corporate sustainability reports," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(2), pages 784-796, April.
    6. Victoria Pistikou & Floros Flouros & Georgios A. Deirmentzoglou & Konstantina K. Agoraki, 2023. "Sustainability Reporting: Examining the Community Impact of the S&P500 Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-25, September.
    7. William Alomoto & Angels Niñerola & Laia Pié, 2022. "Social Impact Assessment: A Systematic Review of Literature," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 161(1), pages 225-250, May.
    8. Davide Giacomini & Laura Rocca & Cristian Carini & Mario Mazzoleni, 2018. "Overcoming the Barriers to the Diffusion of Sustainability Reporting in Italian LGOs: Better Stick or Carrot?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-14, January.
    9. Agnieszka Janik & Adam Ryszko & Marek Szafraniec, 2020. "Greenhouse Gases and Circular Economy Issues in Sustainability Reports from the Energy Sector in the European Union," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-36, November.
    10. Hatefi, S.M. & Torabi, S.A., 2010. "A common weight MCDA-DEA approach to construct composite indicators," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(1), pages 114-120, November.
    11. Lara Tarquinio & Stefanía C. Posadas & Deborah Pedicone, 2020. "Scoring Nonfinancial Information Reporting in Italian Listed Companies: A Comparison of before and after the Legislative Decree 254/2016," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-22, May.
    12. Sara Rajic & Vesna Đorđević & Igor Tomasevic & Ilija Djekic, 2022. "The role of food systems in achieving the sustainable development goals: Environmental perspective," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 988-1001, March.
    13. Małgorzata Janicka & Artur Sajnóg, 2023. "Do environmental and economic performance go hand in hand? An industrial analysis of European Union companies with the non‐parametric data envelopment analysis method," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(5), pages 2590-2605, September.
    14. Cory Searcy, 2012. "Corporate Sustainability Performance Measurement Systems: A Review and Research Agenda," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 107(3), pages 239-253, May.
    15. Sartori, Simone & Witjes, Sjors & Campos, Lucila M.S., 2017. "Sustainability performance for Brazilian electricity power industry: An assessment integrating social, economic and environmental issues," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 41-51.
    16. María Jesús Muñoz-Torres & María Ángeles Fernández-Izquierdo & Juana María Rivera-Lirio & Idoya Ferrero-Ferrero & Elena Escrig-Olmedo, 2021. "Sustainable supply chain management in a global context: a consistency analysis in the textile industry between environmental management practices at company level and sectoral and global environmenta," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 3883-3916, March.
    17. Murat Kucukvar & Khalel Ahmed Alawi & Galal M. Abdella & Muhammet Enis Bulak & Nuri C. Onat & Melih Bulu & Murat Yalçıntaş, 2021. "A frontier‐based managerial approach for relative sustainability performance assessment of the world's airports," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(1), pages 89-107, January.
    18. Domenico Raucci & Lara Tarquinio, 2020. "Sustainability Performance Indicators and Non-Financial Information Reporting. Evidence from the Italian Case," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-17, February.
    19. H. Trollman & J. A. Colwill, 2020. "A Transformational Change Framework for Developing Ecologically Embedded Manufacturing," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 21(4), pages 341-368, December.
    20. Kishore Kumar & Ajai Prakash, 2019. "Examination of sustainability reporting practices in Indian banking sector," Asian Journal of Sustainability and Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 1-16, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:19:p:4934-:d:1491004. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.