IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i18p4572-d1476634.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal Clean Energy Resource Allocation in Balanced and Unbalanced Operation of Sustainable Electrical Energy Distribution Networks

Author

Listed:
  • Abhinav Kumar

    (Electrical Department, National Institute of Technology Jamshedpur, Jamshedpur 831014, India)

  • Sanjay Kumar

    (Electrical Department, National Institute of Technology Jamshedpur, Jamshedpur 831014, India)

  • Umesh Kumar Sinha

    (Electrical Department, National Institute of Technology Jamshedpur, Jamshedpur 831014, India)

  • Aashish Kumar Bohre

    (Electrical Egg. Department, National Institute of Technology, Durgapur 713209, India)

  • Akshay Kumar Saha

    (Discipline of Electrical, Electronic and Computer Engineering, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban 4041, South Africa)

Abstract

Electric power is crucial for economic growth and the overall development of any country. The efficient planning of distribution system is necessary because all the consumers mainly rely on the distribution network to access the power. This paper focuses on addressing distribution system challenges and meeting consumers’ fundamental needs, such as achieving an improved voltage profile and minimizing costs within an environmentally sustainable framework. This work addressed the gap in the existing research by analysing the performance of both balanced and unbalanced systems within the same framework, specifically using the IEEE 33-bus and IEEE 118-bus test systems. Unlike prior studies that focused solely on either balanced or unbalanced systems, this work redistributed balanced loads into three-phase unequal unbalanced loads to create a more challenging unbalanced distribution network. The primary objective is to compare the effects of balanced and unbalanced loads on system the performances and to identify strategies for mitigating unbalanced load issues in each phase. Six optimization methods (PSO, TLBO, JAYA, SCA, RAO, and HBO) were employed to minimize losses, voltage variations, and other multi-objective function factors. Additionally, the study compared the cost of energy loss (CEL), emission factors, costs associated with distributed clean energy resources (DCER), and active and reactive power losses. Phase angle distortions due to unbalanced loads were also analysed. The results showed that among the optimization techniques tested (PSO, TLBO, JAYA, SCA, RAO, and HBO), the HBO method proved to be the most effective for the optimal allocation of distributed clean energy resources, yielding the lowest PF MO values and favourable outcomes across the technical, economic, and environmental parameters.

Suggested Citation

  • Abhinav Kumar & Sanjay Kumar & Umesh Kumar Sinha & Aashish Kumar Bohre & Akshay Kumar Saha, 2024. "Optimal Clean Energy Resource Allocation in Balanced and Unbalanced Operation of Sustainable Electrical Energy Distribution Networks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-52, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:18:p:4572-:d:1476634
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/18/4572/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/18/4572/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Singh, Pushpendra & Meena, Nand K. & Yang, Jin & Vega-Fuentes, Eduardo & Bishnoi, Shree Krishna, 2020. "Multi-criteria decision making monarch butterfly optimization for optimal distributed energy resources mix in distribution networks," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    2. Dong Zhang & GM Shafiullah & Choton Kanti Das & Kok Wai Wong, 2023. "Optimal Allocation of Battery Energy Storage Systems to Enhance System Performance and Reliability in Unbalanced Distribution Networks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-35, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. He, Jiawei & Mu, Rui & Li, Bin & Li, Ye & Zhou, Bohao & Xie, Zhongrun & Wang, Wenbo, 2024. "Applicability boundary calculation for directional current protection in distribution networks with accessed PV power sources," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 370(C).
    2. Liu, Liuchen & Cui, Guomin & Chen, Jiaxing & Huang, Xiaohuang & Li, Di, 2022. "Two-stage superstructure model for optimization of distributed energy systems (DES) part I: Model development and verification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    3. Rosato, Antonello & Panella, Massimo & Andreotti, Amedeo & Mohammed, Osama A. & Araneo, Rodolfo, 2021. "Two-stage dynamic management in energy communities using a decision system based on elastic net regularization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 291(C).
    4. Harsh Wardhan Pandey & Ramesh Kumar & Rajib Kumar Mandal, 2023. "Ranking of mitigation strategies for duck curve in Indian active distribution network using MCDM," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 14(4), pages 1255-1275, August.
    5. Sankar, Matta Mani & Chatterjee, Kalyan, 2023. "A posteriori multiobjective approach for techno-economic allocation of PV and BES units in a distribution system hosting PHEVs," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 351(C).
    6. B. Koti Reddy & Amit Kumar Singh, 2021. "Optimal Operation of a Photovoltaic Integrated Captive Cogeneration Plant with a Utility Grid Using Optimization and Machine Learning Prediction Methods," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-28, August.
    7. Adetunji, Kayode E. & Hofsajer, Ivan W. & Abu-Mahfouz, Adnan M. & Cheng, Ling, 2022. "An optimization planning framework for allocating multiple distributed energy resources and electric vehicle charging stations in distribution networks," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 322(C).
    8. Bahlawan, Hilal & Morini, Mirko & Spina, Pier Ruggero & Venturini, Mauro, 2021. "Inventory scaling, life cycle impact assessment and design optimization of distributed energy plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 304(C).
    9. Mayer, Martin János & Biró, Bence & Szücs, Botond & Aszódi, Attila, 2023. "Probabilistic modeling of future electricity systems with high renewable energy penetration using machine learning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 336(C).
    10. Chen, Ruihua & Deng, Shuai & Zhao, Li & Zhao, Ruikai & Xu, Weicong, 2022. "Energy recovery from wastewater in deep-sea mining: Feasibility study on an energy supply solution with cold wastewater," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).
    11. Zeyu Lin & Hamdi Ayed & Belgacem Bouallegue & Hana Tomaskova & Saeid Jafarzadeh Ghoushchi & Gholamreza Haseli, 2021. "An Integrated Mathematical Attitude Utilizing Fully Fuzzy BWM and Fuzzy WASPAS for Risk Evaluation in a SOFC," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(18), pages 1-18, September.
    12. Pushpendra Singh & Nand Kishor Meena & Jin Yang & Shree Krishna Bishnoi & Eduardo Vega-Fuentes & Chengwei Lou, 2021. "Modified Dragonfly Optimisation for Distributed Energy Mix in Distribution Networks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-19, September.
    13. Guo, Jiacheng & Liu, Zhijian & Wu, Xuan & Wu, Di & Zhang, Shicong & Yang, Xinyan & Ge, Hua & Zhang, Peiwen, 2022. "Two-layer co-optimization method for a distributed energy system combining multiple energy storages," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 322(C).
    14. Fangming Cheng & Zhuo Li & Chang Su & Jiao Qu & Meng Jiang & Hanzhang Ge & Linan Wang & Ziyan Gou, 2023. "Optimization of Emergency Alternatives for Hydrogen Leakage and Explosion Accidents Based on Improved VIKOR," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-17, November.
    15. Ahmadi, Bahman & Ceylan, Oguzhan & Ozdemir, Aydogan & Fotuhi-Firuzabad, Mahmoud, 2022. "A multi-objective framework for distributed energy resources planning and storage management," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 314(C).
    16. Khosravi, Nima & Baghbanzadeh, Rasoul & Oubelaid, Adel & Tostado-Véliz, Marcos & Bajaj, Mohit & Hekss, Zineb & Echalih, Salwa & Belkhier, Youcef & Houran, Mohamad Abou & Aboras, Kareem M., 2023. "A novel control approach to improve the stability of hybrid AC/DC microgrids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 344(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:18:p:4572-:d:1476634. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.