IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i17p4318-d1466301.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Decision-Making Model Supporting Eco-Innovation in Energy Production Based on Quality, Cost and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)

Author

Listed:
  • Dominika Siwiec

    (Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Aeronautics, Rzeszow University of Technology, 35-959 Rzeszow, Poland)

  • Andrzej Pacana

    (Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Aeronautics, Rzeszow University of Technology, 35-959 Rzeszow, Poland)

Abstract

Currently, the development of renewable energy products (RES) encourages the search for innovative solutions that take into account key criteria from the point of view of their sustainable development. Despite efforts in this area, there is a lack of approaches and tools to support this process. Therefore, the aim of the research was to develop a decision-making model supporting eco-innovation in products based on the key criteria of sustainable development: quality (customer satisfaction with use), environmental impact in the life cycle (LCA), and the cost of investment incurred in the product development. The functioning of the model was based on the following factors: (i) obtaining the voice of customers (VoC) and processing it into product criteria as part of the development of alternative production solutions (prototypes), (ii) prospective quality assessment and subsequent life cycle assessment of prototypes, (iii) cost analysis taking into account both quality and environmental criteria, (iv) interpretation of results and search for eco-innovative product solutions. Development decision-making is additionally supported by techniques implemented in the model, e.g., the CRITIC method, the LCA method with Ecoinvent database in OpenLCA, the CEA method, and the morphology method. The model was illustrated and tested for photovoltaic (PV) panels, after which a global sensitivity analysis was performed in Statistica. The test results showed that the main factor that influenced the PV development decisions was the investment cost, followed by quality (customer satisfaction) and then environmental impact in LCA.

Suggested Citation

  • Dominika Siwiec & Andrzej Pacana, 2024. "Decision-Making Model Supporting Eco-Innovation in Energy Production Based on Quality, Cost and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-26, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:17:p:4318-:d:1466301
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/17/4318/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/17/4318/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hongjian Cao & Jianying Zhang & Nengsheng Luo & Zheng Zhang, 2015. "Industrial sustainable development level in China and its influencing factors," Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta u Rijeci/Proceedings of Rijeka Faculty of Economics, University of Rijeka, Faculty of Economics and Business, vol. 33(2), pages 181-205.
    2. Li, Gengfeng & Bie, Zhaohong & Xie, Haipeng & Lin, Yanling, 2016. "Customer satisfaction based reliability evaluation of active distribution networks," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 1571-1578.
    3. Sara Majid & Xin Zhang & Muhammad Bilawal Khaskheli & Feng Hong & Patricia Jie Hung King & Imran Haider Shamsi, 2023. "Eco-Efficiency, Environmental and Sustainable Innovation in Recycling Energy and Their Effect on Business Performance: Evidence from European SMEs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-30, June.
    4. Juan Manuel Bucheli-Calvache & Alexander Zuñiga-Collazos & Fabian Osorio-Tinoco & María de los Ángeles Cervantes-Rosas, 2023. "Proposal for an Eco-Innovation Concept for Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-15, June.
    5. Garvin A. Heath & Timothy J. Silverman & Michael Kempe & Michael Deceglie & Dwarakanath Ravikumar & Timothy Remo & Hao Cui & Parikhit Sinha & Cara Libby & Stephanie Shaw & Keiichi Komoto & Karsten Wam, 2020. "Research and development priorities for silicon photovoltaic module recycling to support a circular economy," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 5(7), pages 502-510, July.
    6. Grzegorz Ostasz & Dominika Siwiec & Andrzej Pacana, 2022. "Model to Determine the Best Modifications of Products with Consideration Customers’ Expectations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-21, October.
    7. Pacca, Sergio & Sivaraman, Deepak & Keoleian, Gregory A., 2007. "Parameters affecting the life cycle performance of PV technologies and systems," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(6), pages 3316-3326, June.
    8. Dominika Siwiec & Andrzej Pacana & Andrzej Gazda, 2023. "A New QFD-CE Method for Considering the Concept of Sustainable Development and Circular Economy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-21, March.
    9. Dominika Siwiec & Andrzej Pacana, 2021. "A Pro-Environmental Method of Sample Size Determination to Predict the Quality Level of Products Considering Current Customers’ Expectations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-22, May.
    10. García, Antonio & Monsalve-Serrano, Javier & Martinez-Boggio, Santiago & Soria Alcaide, Rafael, 2023. "Carbon footprint of battery electric vehicles considering average and marginal electricity mix," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    11. Eng Wolniak & A. Sȩdek, 2009. "Using QFD method for the ecological designing of products and services," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 43(4), pages 695-701, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dominika Siwiec & Andrzej Pacana, 2024. "Eco-Innovation Method for Sustainable Development of Energy-Producing Products Considering Quality and Life Cycle Assessment (QLCA)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-22, August.
    2. Dominika Siwiec & Andrzej Pacana & Andrzej Gazda, 2023. "A New QFD-CE Method for Considering the Concept of Sustainable Development and Circular Economy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-21, March.
    3. Andrzej Pacana & Dominika Siwiec & Jacek Pacana, 2023. "Fuzzy Method to Improve Products and Processes Considering the Approach of Sustainable Development (FQE-SD Method)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-22, June.
    4. Vishnu S Prabhu & Shraddha Shrivastava & Kakali Mukhopadhyay, 2022. "Life Cycle Assessment of Solar Photovoltaic in India: A Circular Economy Approach," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 2(2), pages 507-534, June.
    5. Dominika Siwiec & Wiesław Frącz & Andrzej Pacana & Grzegorz Janowski & Łukasz Bąk, 2024. "Analysis of the Ecological Footprint from the Extraction and Processing of Materials in the LCA Phase of Lithium-Ion Batteries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-19, June.
    6. L. Hay & A. H. B. Duffy & R. I. Whitfield, 2017. "The S‐Cycle Performance Matrix: Supporting Comprehensive Sustainability Performance Evaluation of Technical Systems," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(1), pages 45-70, January.
    7. Vimpari, Jussi & Junnila, Seppo, 2017. "Evaluating decentralized energy investments: Spatial value of on-site PV electricity," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 1217-1222.
    8. Yu-Shan Chen & Ching-Hsun Chang, 2013. "Enhance environmental commitments and green intangible assets toward green competitive advantages: an analysis of structural equation modeling (SEM)," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 529-543, January.
    9. Beylot, Antoine & Payet, Jérôme & Puech, Clément & Adra, Nadine & Jacquin, Philippe & Blanc, Isabelle & Beloin-Saint-Pierre, Didier, 2014. "Environmental impacts of large-scale grid-connected ground-mounted PV installations," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 2-6.
    10. Kılkış, Şiir & Ulpiani, Giulia & Vetters, Nadja, 2024. "Visions for climate neutrality and opportunities for co-learning in European cities," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    11. Ludin, Norasikin Ahmad & Mustafa, Nur Ifthitah & Hanafiah, Marlia M. & Ibrahim, Mohd Adib & Asri Mat Teridi, Mohd & Sepeai, Suhaila & Zaharim, Azami & Sopian, Kamaruzzaman, 2018. "Prospects of life cycle assessment of renewable energy from solar photovoltaic technologies: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 11-28.
    12. Ibrahim Mutambik & Abdullah Almuqrin, 2024. "The Best of Both Worlds: How Financial Growth Can Engender Improved Sustainability for Businesses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-23, June.
    13. Victor Kouloumpis & Antonios Kalogerakis & Anastasia Pavlidou & George Tsinarakis & George Arampatzis, 2020. "Should Photovoltaics Stay at Home? Comparative Life Cycle Environmental Assessment on Roof-Mounted and Ground-Mounted Photovoltaics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-15, November.
    14. Ivan Deviatkin & Sanna Rousu & Malahat Ghoreishi & Mohammad Naji Nassajfar & Mika Horttanainen & Ville Leminen, 2022. "Implementation of Circular Economy Strategies within the Electronics Sector: Insights from Finnish Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-11, March.
    15. Zeng, Huibin & Shao, Bilin & Dai, Hongbin & Yan, Yichuan & Tian, Ning, 2023. "Natural gas demand response strategy considering user satisfaction and load volatility under dynamic pricing," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    16. Andrzej Pacana & Dominika Siwiec & Robert Ulewicz & Malgorzata Ulewicz, 2024. "A Novelty Model Employing the Quality Life Cycle Assessment (QLCA) Indicator and Frameworks for Selecting Qualitative and Environmental Aspects for Sustainable Product Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-24, September.
    17. Gerbinet, Saïcha & Belboom, Sandra & Léonard, Angélique, 2014. "Life Cycle Analysis (LCA) of photovoltaic panels: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 747-753.
    18. Fabio De Felice & Antonella Petrillo, 2021. "Green Transition: The Frontier of the Digicircular Economy Evidenced from a Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-26, October.
    19. Andrea Bacchiocchi & Alessandro Bellocchi & Germana Giombini, 2024. "Green Investment Challenges in European Firms: Internal vs. External Resources," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-20, January.
    20. Tiantian Zhang & Meng Wang & Hongxing Yang, 2018. "A Review of the Energy Performance and Life-Cycle Assessment of Building-Integrated Photovoltaic (BIPV) Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-34, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:17:p:4318-:d:1466301. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.