IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i13p3284-d1428802.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Response of Carbon Energy Storage to Land Use/Cover Changes in Shanxi Province, China

Author

Listed:
  • Huan Tang

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Tongling University, Tongling 244061, China
    Spatial Information Acquisition and Application Joint Laboratory of Anhui Province, Tongling 244000, China)

  • Xiao Liu

    (Wuhan Geomatics Institute, Wuhan 430022, China)

  • Ruijie Xie

    (Tongling Seismic Station, Tongling 244061, China)

  • Yuqin Lin

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Tongling University, Tongling 244061, China)

  • Jiawei Fang

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Tongling University, Tongling 244061, China
    Spatial Information Acquisition and Application Joint Laboratory of Anhui Province, Tongling 244000, China)

  • Jing Yuan

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Tongling University, Tongling 244061, China
    Spatial Information Acquisition and Application Joint Laboratory of Anhui Province, Tongling 244000, China
    Department of Civil Engineering, Manitoba University, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada)

Abstract

Carbon storage services play an important role in maintaining ecosystem stability. Land use/cover change (LUCC) is the main factor leading to changes in ecosystem carbon storage. Understanding the impact of LUCC on regional carbon storage changes is crucial for protecting regional ecosystems and promoting sustainable socio-economic development. This paper selects Shanxi province as the study area and explores the spatial and temporal evolution characteristics of carbon storage in Shanxi province based on the InVEST model and univariate spatial autocorrelation. The results show that the total carbon storage in Shanxi Province in 2000, 2010, and 2020 is 513.51 × 10 4 t C, 513.46 × 10 4 t C, and 509.29 × 10 4 t C, respectively. High carbon storage areas are distributed in forest and grassland land types, while low carbon storage areas are widely distributed in building land in urban metropolitan areas. Shanxi Province is mainly dominated by farmland, which has decreased by 3448.60 km 2 in the past 20 years. Grassland has decreased by 1588.31 km 2 and the area of building land has increased by 4205.73 km 2 . Due to the influence of carbon conversion among different land use types, the total carbon storage loss of Shanxi Province in the past 20 years was 4.21 × 10 4 t C. The transfer of farmland resulted in an increase in carbon stock of 14.46 × 10 4 t C. The transfer of grassland resulted in an increase of 17.15 × 10 4 t C, while the transfer of forest resulted in a decrease of 41.44 × 10 4 t C. The increase in land use types with low carbon density and the decrease in land use types with high carbon density led to the decrease in carbon storage in Shanxi Province. Furthermore, social factors were more likely to influence the carbon storage than natural factors, and the influence of social factors was often negative. On this basis, regional development countermeasures were proposed for the current situation of carbon storage in Shanxi Province and provide a scientific basis for Shanxi Province to achieve the carbon neutrality target.

Suggested Citation

  • Huan Tang & Xiao Liu & Ruijie Xie & Yuqin Lin & Jiawei Fang & Jing Yuan, 2024. "Response of Carbon Energy Storage to Land Use/Cover Changes in Shanxi Province, China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-16, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:13:p:3284-:d:1428802
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/13/3284/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/13/3284/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lyndré Nel & Ana Flávia Boeni & Viola Judit Prohászka & Alfréd Szilágyi & Eszter Tormáné Kovács & László Pásztor & Csaba Centeri, 2022. "InVEST Soil Carbon Stock Modelling of Agricultural Landscapes as an Ecosystem Service Indicator," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-19, August.
    2. Chang Zhao & Heather A Sander, 2015. "Quantifying and Mapping the Supply of and Demand for Carbon Storage and Sequestration Service from Urban Trees," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(8), pages 1-31, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tiantian Ma & Qingbai Hu & Changle Wang & Jungang Lv & Changhong Mi & Rongguang Shi & Xiaoli Wang & Yanying Yang & Wenhao Wu, 2022. "Exploring the Relationship between Ecosystem Services under Different Socio-Economic Driving Degrees," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-17, December.
    2. Arturo Sanchez-Porras & María Guadalupe Tenorio-Arvide & Ricardo Darío Peña-Moreno & María Laura Sampedro-Rosas & Sonia Emilia Silva-Gómez, 2018. "Evaluation of the Potential Change to the Ecosystem Service Provision Due to Industrialization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-20, September.
    3. Jian Chen & Kai Wang & Maomao Li & Xianzhi Wang & Xiaoxiao Zhang & Lixin Niu & Yanlong Zhang, 2023. "Prediction and Evolution of Carbon Storage of Terrestrial Ecosystems in the Qinling Mountains North Slope Region, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-17, November.
    4. Yonghua Li & Song Yao & Hezhou Jiang & Huarong Wang & Qinchuan Ran & Xinyun Gao & Xinyi Ding & Dandong Ge, 2022. "Spatial-Temporal Evolution and Prediction of Carbon Storage: An Integrated Framework Based on the MOP–PLUS–InVEST Model and an Applied Case Study in Hangzhou, East China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-22, December.
    5. Tong Lin & Dafang Wu & Muzhuang Yang & Peifang Ma & Yanyan Liu & Feng Liu & Ziying Gan, 2022. "Evolution and Simulation of Terrestrial Ecosystem Carbon Storage and Sustainability Assessment in Karst Areas: A Case Study of Guizhou Province," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-19, December.
    6. Eszter Tormáné Kovács & Csaba Centeri, 2023. "Assessment of Ecosystem Services at Different Scales," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-5, December.
    7. István Kristó & Marianna Vályi-Nagy & Attila Rácz & Katalin Irmes & Lajos Szentpéteri & Márton Jolánkai & Gergő Péter Kovács & Mária Ágnes Fodor & Apolka Ujj & Klára Veresné Valentinyi & Melinda Tar, 2023. "Effects of Nutrient Supply and Seed Size on Germination Parameters and Yield in the Next Crop Year of Winter Wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-17, February.
    8. Hongjuan Zhang & Juan Feng & Zhicheng Zhang & Kang Liu & Xin Gao & Zidong Wang, 2020. "Regional Spatial Management Based on Supply–Demand Risk of Ecosystem Services—A Case Study of the Fenghe River Watershed," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-25, June.
    9. Shuaijun Yue & Guangxing Ji & Weiqiang Chen & Junchang Huang & Yulong Guo & Mingyue Cheng, 2023. "Spatial and Temporal Variability Characteristics of Future Carbon Stocks in Anhui Province under Different SSP Scenarios Based on PLUS and InVEST Models," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-17, August.
    10. Wei, Hejie & Liu, Huiming & Xu, Zihan & Ren, Jiahui & Lu, Nachuan & Fan, Weiguo & Zhang, Peng & Dong, Xiaobin, 2018. "Linking ecosystem services supply, social demand and human well-being in a typical mountain–oasis–desert area, Xinjiang, China," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 31(PA), pages 44-57.
    11. Baró, Francesc & Gómez-Baggethun, Erik & Haase, Dagmar, 2017. "Ecosystem service bundles along the urban-rural gradient: Insights for landscape planning and management," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 147-159.
    12. Wei, Hejie & Fan, Weiguo & Wang, Xuechao & Lu, Nachuan & Dong, Xiaobin & Zhao, Yanan & Ya, Xijia & Zhao, Yifei, 2017. "Integrating supply and social demand in ecosystem services assessment: A review," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 15-27.
    13. Jiayu Wang & Tian Chen, 2022. "A Multi-Scenario Land Expansion Simulation Method from Ecosystem Services Perspective of Coastal Urban Agglomeration: A Case Study of GHM-GBA, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-23, October.
    14. Cortinovis, Chiara & Geneletti, Davide, 2019. "A framework to explore the effects of urban planning decisions on regulating ecosystem services in cities," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 1-1.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:13:p:3284-:d:1428802. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.