IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i12p2911-d1414069.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pipeline Infrastructure for CO 2 Transport: Cost Analysis and Design Optimization

Author

Listed:
  • Mithran Daniel Solomon

    (Fraunhofer Institute for Factory Operation and Automation IFF, Sandtorstraße 22, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany)

  • Marcel Scheffler

    (Fraunhofer Institute for Factory Operation and Automation IFF, Sandtorstraße 22, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany)

  • Wolfram Heineken

    (Fraunhofer Institute for Factory Operation and Automation IFF, Sandtorstraße 22, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany)

  • Mostafa Ashkavand

    (Fraunhofer Institute for Factory Operation and Automation IFF, Sandtorstraße 22, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany)

  • Torsten Birth-Reichert

    (Fraunhofer Institute for Factory Operation and Automation IFF, Sandtorstraße 22, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany
    Department of Mechanical Engineering and Production, Faculty of Technology and Computer Science, University of Applied Life Sciences Hamburg, Berliner Tor 5, 20099 Hamburg, Germany)

Abstract

Meeting Germany’s climate targets urgently demands substantial investment in renewable energies such as hydrogen, as well as tackling industrial CO 2 emissions with a strong CO 2 transport infrastructure. This is particularly crucial for CO 2 -heavy industries such as steel, cement, lime production, power plants, and chemical plants, given Germany’s ban on onshore storage. The CO 2 transport network is essential for maintaining a circular economy by capturing, transporting, and either storing or utilizing CO 2 . This study fills gaps in CO 2 pipeline transport research, examining pipeline diameters, costs, and pressure drop, and providing sensitivity analysis. Key findings show that the levelized cost of CO 2 transport (LCO2T) ranges from 0.25 €/t to 55.82 €/t based on varying transport masses (1000 t/day to 25,000 t/day) and distances (25 km to 500 km), with compression costs pushing LCO2T to 33.21 €/t to 92.82 €/t. Analyzing eight pipeline diameters (150 mm to 500 mm) and the impact of CO 2 flow temperature on pressure loss highlights the importance of selecting optimal pipeline sizes. Precise booster station placement is also crucial, as it significantly affects the total LCO2T. Exploring these areas can offer a more thorough understanding of the best strategies for developing cost-effective, efficient, and sustainable transport infrastructure.

Suggested Citation

  • Mithran Daniel Solomon & Marcel Scheffler & Wolfram Heineken & Mostafa Ashkavand & Torsten Birth-Reichert, 2024. "Pipeline Infrastructure for CO 2 Transport: Cost Analysis and Design Optimization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-21, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:12:p:2911-:d:1414069
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/12/2911/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/12/2911/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Enbin Liu & Xudong Lu & Daocheng Wang, 2023. "A Systematic Review of Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage: Status, Progress and Challenges," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-48, March.
    2. McCollum, David L & Ogden, Joan M, 2006. "Techno-Economic Models for Carbon Dioxide Compression, Transport, and Storage & Correlations for Estimating Carbon Dioxide Density and Viscosity," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt1zg00532, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Verma, Aman & Kumar, Amit, 2015. "Life cycle assessment of hydrogen production from underground coal gasification," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 556-568.
    2. Olateju, Babatunde & Kumar, Amit, 2013. "Techno-economic assessment of hydrogen production from underground coal gasification (UCG) in Western Canada with carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) for upgrading bitumen from oil sands," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 428-440.
    3. Eric Saffou & Arshad Raza & Raoof Gholami & Ciriako Aci & Jan van Bever Donker & Sofyan Salem & Udo Zimmermann & Mimonitu Opuwari & Leon Croukamp & Walter Romaric Elingou & Tapas Chatterjee & Musa S.D, 2022. "Full‐scale simulation of a nearly depleted gas field in South Africa for carbon utilisation and storage," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 12(4), pages 486-507, August.
    4. Nakaten, Natalie & Schlüter, Ralph & Azzam, Rafig & Kempka, Thomas, 2014. "Development of a techno-economic model for dynamic calculation of cost of electricity, energy demand and CO2 emissions of an integrated UCG–CCS process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 779-790.
    5. Edward H Owens & Samuel Chapman & Paul Allan, 2010. "The Impact of Carbon Capture and Storage on Coal Resource Depletion," Energy & Environment, , vol. 21(8), pages 925-936, December.
    6. Patange, Omkar S. & Garg, Amit & Jayaswal, Sachin, 2022. "An integrated bottom-up optimization to investigate the role of BECCS in transitioning towards a net-zero energy system: A case study from Gujarat, India," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    7. Wang, Tao & Yu, Wei & Le Moullec, Yann & Liu, Fei & Xiong, Yili & He, Hui & Lu, Jiahui & Hsu, Emily & Fang, Mengxiang & Luo, Zhongyang, 2017. "Solvent regeneration by novel direct non-aqueous gas stripping process for post-combustion CO2 capture," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 23-32.
    8. Zeng, Bingxin & Zhu, Lei & Yao, Xing, 2020. "Policy choice for end-of-pipe abatement technology adoption under technological uncertainty," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 121-130.
    9. Suoton P. Peletiri & Nejat Rahmanian & Iqbal M. Mujtaba, 2018. "CO 2 Pipeline Design: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-25, August.
    10. Dahai, He & Zhihong, Yin & Lin, Qin & Yuhong, Li & Lei, Tian & Jiang, Li & Liandong, Zhu, 2024. "The application of magical microalgae in carbon sequestration and emission reduction: Removal mechanisms and potential analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    11. Bennæs, Anders & Skogset, Martin & Svorkdal, Tormod & Fagerholt, Kjetil & Herlicka, Lisa & Meisel, Frank & Rickels, Wilfried, 2024. "Modeling a supply chain for carbon capture and offshore storage—A German–Norwegian case study," Open Access Publications from Kiel Institute for the World Economy 295104, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    12. Natalie Nakaten & Thomas Kempka, 2019. "Techno-Economic Comparison of Onshore and Offshore Underground Coal Gasification End-Product Competitiveness," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-28, August.
    13. Yang, Yu & Liu, Jing & Shen, Weifeng & Li, Jie & Chien, I-Lung, 2018. "High-efficiency utilization of CO2 in the methanol production by a novel parallel-series system combining steam and dry methane reforming," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 820-829.
    14. Yuan, Jia-Hai & Lyon, Thomas P., 2012. "Promoting global CCS RDD&D by stronger U.S.–China collaboration," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(9), pages 6746-6769.
    15. Giulia Costa & Alessandra Polettini & Raffaella Pomi & Alessio Stramazzo & Daniela Zingaretti, 2017. "Energetic assessment of CO 2 sequestration through slurry carbonation of steel slag: a factorial study," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 7(3), pages 530-541, June.
    16. Günther, Philipp & Ekardt, Felix, 2022. "Human Rights and Large-Scale Carbon Dioxide Removal: Potential Limits to BECCS and DACCS Deployment," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 11(12), pages 1-29.
    17. Verma, Aman & Olateju, Babatunde & Kumar, Amit, 2015. "Greenhouse gas abatement costs of hydrogen production from underground coal gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 556-568.
    18. Lei Zhu & Xin Liu, 2015. "Promoting the Carbon Removal in Coal Utilization-A Benefit-Risk Analysis among Full-Chain Carbon Capture and Utilization Project," Energy & Environment, , vol. 26(6-7), pages 1035-1053, November.
    19. Wenjin Chen & Jun Zhang & Feng Li & Ruoyi Zhang & Sennan Qi & Guoqing Li & Chong Wang, 2023. "Low Carbon Economic Dispatch of Integrated Energy System Considering Power-to-Gas Heat Recovery and Carbon Capture," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-19, April.
    20. Yao, Xing & Fan, Ying & Zhu, Lei & Zhang, Xian, 2020. "Optimization of dynamic incentive for the deployment of carbon dioxide removal technology: A nonlinear dynamic approach combined with real options," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:12:p:2911-:d:1414069. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.