IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i11p2599-d1403642.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Life Cycle Assessment of a Wood Biomass Gasification Plant and Implications for Syngas and Biochar Utilization

Author

Listed:
  • Francesco Arfelli

    (Department of Industrial Chemistry “Toso Montanari”, University of Bologna, Via Piero Gobetti, 85, 40129 Bologna, Italy)

  • Cristian Tosi

    (Curti-Costruzioni Meccaniche-S.P.A., Via Emilia Ponente, 750, 48014 Castel Bolognese, Italy)

  • Luca Ciacci

    (Department of Industrial Chemistry “Toso Montanari”, University of Bologna, Via Piero Gobetti, 85, 40129 Bologna, Italy
    Interdepartmental Centre of Industrial Research “Renewable Resources, Environment, Sea and Energy”, University of Bologna, Via Angherà, 22, 47922 Rimini, Italy)

  • Fabrizio Passarini

    (Department of Industrial Chemistry “Toso Montanari”, University of Bologna, Via Piero Gobetti, 85, 40129 Bologna, Italy
    Interdepartmental Centre of Industrial Research “Renewable Resources, Environment, Sea and Energy”, University of Bologna, Via Angherà, 22, 47922 Rimini, Italy)

Abstract

The growing attention regarding the environmental challenges in the energy sectors pushes the industrial system toward the investigation of more sustainable and renewable energy sources to replace fossil ones. Among the promising alternatives, biomass is considered a valid source to convert the system and to reduce the fossil fraction of the national energy mixes, but its multiple potential uses need an environmental evaluation to understand the actual benefit when it is used as an energy resource. For this purpose, life cycle assessment (LCA) is applied to a wood biomass gasification system aimed to produce electricity and heat generated after the combustion of the produced syngas and the management of the biochar. The aim is to provide a quantitative comparison of (i) a baseline scenario where wood biomass is sourced from waste and (ii) a second scenario where wood biomass is drawn from dedicated cultivation. A further evaluation was finally applied to investigate the environmental implications associated with the biochar composition, assuming it was used on land. The proposed strategies resulted in an environmental credit for both the examined scenarios, but the outcomes showed a net preference for the baseline scenario, resulting in better environmental performances for all the examined categories with respect to the second one. It underlines the potentialities of using waste-sourced biomass. However, according to the Climate Change category, if on-site dedicated biomass cultivation is assumed for the second scenario, the baseline is considered preferable only if the biomass transportation distance is <600 km, which is estimated as a theoretical distance for scenarios to break even. Finally, biochar composition proved a particular concern for toxicity-related categories. This study highlights the importance of applying objective and standardized methodologies such as LCA to evaluate energy production systems based on alternative sources and to support decision-making toward achieving sustainability goals.

Suggested Citation

  • Francesco Arfelli & Cristian Tosi & Luca Ciacci & Fabrizio Passarini, 2024. "Life Cycle Assessment of a Wood Biomass Gasification Plant and Implications for Syngas and Biochar Utilization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-15, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:11:p:2599-:d:1403642
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/11/2599/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/11/2599/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tonini, Davide & Astrup, Thomas, 2012. "LCA of biomass-based energy systems: A case study for Denmark," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 234-246.
    2. Sérgio Ferreira & Eliseu Monteiro & Luís Calado & Valter Silva & Paulo Brito & Cândida Vilarinho, 2019. "Experimental and Modeling Analysis of Brewers´ Spent Grains Gasification in a Downdraft Reactor," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-18, November.
    3. Zang, Guiyan & Zhang, Jianan & Jia, Junxi & Lora, Electo Silva & Ratner, Albert, 2020. "Life cycle assessment of power-generation systems based on biomass integrated gasification combined cycles," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 336-346.
    4. Jun-Xian Wang & Da-Mao Xu & Rong-Bing Fu & Jia-Peng Chen, 2021. "Bioavailability Assessment of Heavy Metals Using Various Multi-Element Extractants in an Indigenous Zinc Smelting Contaminated Site, Southwestern China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-11, August.
    5. Liqing Peng & Timothy D. Searchinger & Jessica Zionts & Richard Waite, 2023. "The carbon costs of global wood harvests," Nature, Nature, vol. 620(7972), pages 110-115, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fang, Yi & Paul, Manosh C. & Varjani, Sunita & Li, Xian & Park, Young-Kwon & You, Siming, 2021. "Concentrated solar thermochemical gasification of biomass: Principles, applications, and development," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    2. Octávio Alves & Luís Calado & Roberta M. Panizio & Catarina Nobre & Eliseu Monteiro & Paulo Brito & Margarida Gonçalves, 2022. "Gasification of Solid Recovered Fuels with Variable Fractions of Polymeric Materials," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-19, November.
    3. Atsonios, Konstantinos & Kougioumtzis, Michael-Alexander & D. Panopoulos, Kyriakos & Kakaras, Emmanuel, 2015. "Alternative thermochemical routes for aviation biofuels via alcohols synthesis: Process modeling, techno-economic assessment and comparison," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 346-366.
    4. Østergaard, P.A. & Lund, H. & Thellufsen, J.Z. & Sorknæs, P. & Mathiesen, B.V., 2022. "Review and validation of EnergyPLAN," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    5. Evgeniy Kirichenko & Ksenia Kirichenko & Anna Kirichenko, 2024. "List of Issues That Require Legal Regulation as Part of the Renewable Energy Regulation in Component States of Federation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-24, February.
    6. Atanas Atanasov & Ivaylo Hristakov & Gergana Kuncheva & Milan Koszel & Veselin Dochev, 2023. "Assessment of heavy metals in soil, oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) and honey," Plant, Soil and Environment, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 69(8), pages 400-407.
    7. Huang, Y. & McIlveen-Wright, D.R. & Rezvani, S. & Huang, M.J. & Wang, Y.D. & Roskilly, A.P. & Hewitt, N.J., 2013. "Comparative techno-economic analysis of biomass fuelled combined heat and power for commercial buildings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 518-525.
    8. Yin, Kexin & Wei, Ranran & Ruan, Jiuxu & Cui, Peizhe & Zhu, Zhaoyou & Wang, Yinglong & Zhao, Xinling, 2023. "Life cycle assessment and life cycle cost analysis of surgical mask from production to recycling into hydrogen process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    9. Ren, Siyue & Feng, Xiao & Wang, Yufei, 2021. "Emergy evaluation of the integrated gasification combined cycle power generation systems with a carbon capture system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    10. Sitka, Andrzej & Szulc, Piotr & Smykowski, Daniel & Jodkowski, Wiesław, 2021. "Application of poultry manure as an energy resource by its gasification in a prototype rotary counterflow gasifier," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 422-429.
    11. Malça, João & Coelho, António & Freire, Fausto, 2014. "Environmental life-cycle assessment of rapeseed-based biodiesel: Alternative cultivation systems and locations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 837-844.
    12. Turconi, Roberto & Boldrin, Alessio & Astrup, Thomas, 2013. "Life cycle assessment (LCA) of electricity generation technologies: Overview, comparability and limitations," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 555-565.
    13. Nariê Rinke Dias de Souza & Alexandre Souza & Mateus Ferreira Chagas & Thayse Aparecida Dourado Hernandes & Otávio Cavalett, 2022. "Addressing the contributions of electricity from biomass in Brazil in the context of the Sustainable Development Goals using life cycle assessment methods," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(3), pages 980-995, June.
    14. Gabriele Calì & Paolo Deiana & Claudia Bassano & Simone Meloni & Enrico Maggio & Michele Mascia & Alberto Pettinau, 2020. "Syngas Production, Clean-Up and Wastewater Management in a Demo-Scale Fixed-Bed Updraft Biomass Gasification Unit," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-15, May.
    15. Lee, Boreum & Lim, Dongjun & Lee, Hyunjun & Byun, Manhee & Lim, Hankwon, 2021. "Techno-economic analysis of H2 energy storage system based on renewable energy certificate," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 91-98.
    16. Ardolino, Filomena & Lodato, Concetta & Astrup, Thomas F. & Arena, Umberto, 2018. "Energy recovery from plastic and biomass waste by means of fluidized bed gasification: A life cycle inventory model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PB), pages 299-314.
    17. Rillo, E. & Gandiglio, M. & Lanzini, A. & Bobba, S. & Santarelli, M. & Blengini, G., 2017. "Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of biogas-fed Solid Oxide Fuel Cell (SOFC) plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 585-602.
    18. Tanveer, Waqas Hassan & Abdelkareem, Mohammad Ali & Kolosz, Ben W. & Rezk, Hegazy & Andresen, John & Cha, Suk Won & Sayed, Enas Taha, 2021. "The role of vacuum based technologies in solid oxide fuel cell development to utilize industrial waste carbon for power production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    19. Monteiro, Eliseu & Ramos, Ana & Rouboa, Abel, 2024. "Fundamental designs of gasification plants for combined heat and power," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    20. Hosseini, Seyed Mohsen & Kanagaraj, N. & Sadeghi, Shahrbanoo & Yousefi, Hossein, 2022. "Midpoint and endpoint impacts of electricity generation by renewable and nonrenewable technologies: A case study of Alberta, Canada," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 22-39.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:11:p:2599-:d:1403642. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.