IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2023i1p164-d1308902.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Characterization of Uganda’s Main Agri-Food Value Chain Wastes for Gasification

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Wilberforce Olupot

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Makerere University, Kampala P.O. Box 7062, Uganda)

  • Tadeo Mibulo

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Makerere University, Kampala P.O. Box 7062, Uganda)

  • Jacintha Gumoteyo Nayebare

    (Department of Geo-Informatics, Kyambogo University, Kampala P.O. Box 01, Uganda)

Abstract

Agricultural residues are a source of energy derived through various conversion processes. They are gaining attention as a solution to limited energy access in developing countries in which a majority of the population depends on agriculture for a living at a time when global population growth is outpacing the depreciation of conventional energy sources. This study characterized residues generated along the main agri-food value chains in Uganda for gasification by reviewing relevant literature and through field measurements and laboratory experiments. Maize, beans, cassava, banana, coffee, and sugarcane are the most important value chains, occupying 5.73 million hectares, and accounting for 40% of the country’s total area under cultivation. In terms of biomass residues, banana, maize, and sugarcane are the most feasible options, producing 4.18, 2.2, and 0.6 metric tons of biomass waste per ton, respectively. The bulk densities vary from 65.5 to 160 kg/m 3 , moisture content from 6.67 to 22.5%, and heating values from 12.6 to 16.74 MJ/kg for all residues. In terms of principal elements, oxygen has the highest proportion of 38.76–57.25% followed by carbon, 33.46–47.9%, and hydrogen 6%. The lignocellulosic composition is 23.46–41.38% hemicellulose, 9.9–55% cellulose, and 5.77–35% lignin. The three value chains have the potential to generate 172.2 PJ annually, which is enough to offset 50% of the cooking energy demands for Uganda. The main disadvantage of this is the low bulk density, which raises production costs and reduces conversion efficiency. Bulk density can be improved by densification through the compaction of residues. Given their composition and current utilization, maize stover, banana leaves, banana pseudo stems, and sugarcane tops are promising gasification feedstocks.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Wilberforce Olupot & Tadeo Mibulo & Jacintha Gumoteyo Nayebare, 2023. "Characterization of Uganda’s Main Agri-Food Value Chain Wastes for Gasification," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-17, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2023:i:1:p:164-:d:1308902
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/1/164/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/1/164/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lubwama, Michael & Yiga, Vianney Andrew, 2017. "Development of groundnut shells and bagasse briquettes as sustainable fuel sources for domestic cooking applications in Uganda," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 532-542.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kipngetich, P. & Kiplimo, R. & Tanui, J.K. & Chisale, P.C., 2022. "Optimization of combustion parameters of carbonized rice husk briquettes in a fixed bed using RSM technique," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 61-74.
    2. Bot, Bill Vaneck & Axaopoulos, Petros J. & Sakellariou, Evangelos I. & Sosso, Olivier Thierry & Tamba, Jean Gaston, 2022. "Energetic and economic analysis of biomass briquettes production from agricultural residues," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 321(C).
    3. Lubwama, Michael & Yiga, Vianney Andrew & Muhairwe, Frank & Kihedu, Joseph, 2020. "Physical and combustion properties of agricultural residue bio-char bio-composite briquettes as sustainable domestic energy sources," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 1002-1016.
    4. Sunday Yusuf Kpalo & Mohamad Faiz Zainuddin & Latifah Abd Manaf & Ahmad Muhaimin Roslan, 2020. "Production and Characterization of Hybrid Briquettes from Corncobs and Oil Palm Trunk Bark under a Low Pressure Densification Technique," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-16, March.
    5. Granado, Marcos Paulo Patta & Suhogusoff, Yuri Valentinovich Machado & Santos, Luis Ricardo Oliveira & Yamaji, Fabio Minoru & De Conti, Andrea Cressoni, 2021. "Effects of pressure densification on strength and properties of cassava waste briquettes," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 306-312.
    6. Bill Vaneck Bot & Petros J. Axaopoulos & Evangelos I. Sakellariou & Olivier Thierry Sosso & Jean Gaston Tamba, 2023. "Economic Viability Investigation of Mixed-Biomass Briquettes Made from Agricultural Residues for Household Cooking Use," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-13, September.
    7. Juan Jesús Rico & Raquel Pérez-Orozco & Natalia Cid & Ana Larrañaga & José Luis Míguez Tabarés, 2020. "Viability of Agricultural and Forestry Residues as Biomass Fuels in the Galicia-North Portugal Region: An Experimental Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-20, October.
    8. Lubwama, Michael & Yiga, Vianney Andrew, 2018. "Characteristics of briquettes developed from rice and coffee husks for domestic cooking applications in Uganda," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 43-55.
    9. Pavla Fajfrlíková & Anna Brunerová & Hynek Roubík, 2020. "Analyses of Waste Treatment in Rural Areas of East Java with the Possibility of Low-Pressure Briquetting Press Application," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-14, October.
    10. Sunday Yusuf Kpalo & Mohamad Faiz Zainuddin & Latifah Abd Manaf & Ahmad Muhaimin Roslan, 2020. "A Review of Technical and Economic Aspects of Biomass Briquetting," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-30, June.
    11. Thembelihle Chaza & Ngonidzashe Mangoma & Tapiwa Nyakuedzwa & Thembekile Ncube, 2023. "Valorization of Groundnut Shell Biomass for Biosorption of Hexavalent Chromium from Aqueous Solution," Journal of Sustainable Development, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 16(2), pages 1-72, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2023:i:1:p:164-:d:1308902. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.