IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i6p2704-d1096915.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Techno-Economic Analysis of the Modernization Options of a Gas Turbine Power Plant Using Aspen HYSYS

Author

Listed:
  • Dias Raybekovich Umyshev

    (Department of Thermal Power Plants, Institute of Heat Power Engineering and Control Systems, Almaty University of Power Engineering and Telecommunications, Almaty 050013, Kazakhstan)

  • Eduard Vladislavovich Osipov

    (Mechanical Engineering for Chemical Industry, Institute of Mechanical Engineering for Chemical and Petrochemical Industry, Kazan National Research Technological University, 420015 Kazan, Russia)

  • Andrey Anatolievich Kibarin

    (Department of Thermal Power Plants, Institute of Heat Power Engineering and Control Systems, Almaty University of Power Engineering and Telecommunications, Almaty 050013, Kazakhstan)

  • Maxim Sergeyevich Korobkov

    (Department of Thermal Power Plants, Institute of Heat Power Engineering and Control Systems, Almaty University of Power Engineering and Telecommunications, Almaty 050013, Kazakhstan)

  • Tatyana Viktorovna Khodanova

    (Department of Thermal Power Plants, Institute of Heat Power Engineering and Control Systems, Almaty University of Power Engineering and Telecommunications, Almaty 050013, Kazakhstan)

  • Zhansaya Serikkyzy Duisenbek

    (Department of Thermal Power Plants, Institute of Heat Power Engineering and Control Systems, Almaty University of Power Engineering and Telecommunications, Almaty 050013, Kazakhstan)

Abstract

Currently, 90% of Kazakhstan’s oil is situated in 15 oil and gas fields where simple cycle gas turbines are utilized for electricity generation. The need for developing techniques to enhance the efficiency and eco-friendliness of fuel consumption in Kazakhstan’s oil fields is imperative. In this article, methods for improving the energy efficiency of a simple gas turbine power plant functioning in an oil field are discussed, with consideration given to the impact of ambient temperature and specific environmental constraints, such as water scarcity and high temperatures. Two schemes to increase efficiency are evaluated: the first involves the utilization of a waste heat boiler for steam production intended for technological purposes, while the second involves electricity generation through a combination of a waste heat boiler and a steam turbine. Models based on Aspen HYSYS were formulated, with actual gas turbine power plant operation taken into account. Analysis indicated that a waste heat boiler scheme could generate up to 350 t/h of steam, completely replacing power boilers. Im plementation of the combined cycle power plant (CCPP) system resulted in the production of up to 262.42 MW of electricity. Environmental analyses demonstrated that both schemes exhibit comparable specific emissions in terms of power generation, with 0.56 kgCO 2 /kWh for HRSG and 0.53 kgCO 2 /kWh for CCPP. Technological, environmental, and economic analyses were conducted to determine the most promising technology, considering the specifics of the oil fields in Kazakhstan. Based on the payback period for HRSG (4 years) and CCPP (7 years) options, it was deduced that the former is the most favorable for implementation

Suggested Citation

  • Dias Raybekovich Umyshev & Eduard Vladislavovich Osipov & Andrey Anatolievich Kibarin & Maxim Sergeyevich Korobkov & Tatyana Viktorovna Khodanova & Zhansaya Serikkyzy Duisenbek, 2023. "Techno-Economic Analysis of the Modernization Options of a Gas Turbine Power Plant Using Aspen HYSYS," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-22, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:6:p:2704-:d:1096915
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/6/2704/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/6/2704/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Panowski, Marcin & Zarzycki, Robert & Kobyłecki, Rafał, 2021. "Conversion of steam power plant into cogeneration unit - Case study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    2. Kruk-Gotzman, Sylwia & Ziółkowski, Paweł & Iliev, Iliya & Negreanu, Gabriel-Paul & Badur, Janusz, 2023. "Techno-economic evaluation of combined cycle gas turbine and a diabatic compressed air energy storage integration concept," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    3. Kotowicz, Janusz & Brzęczek, Mateusz, 2018. "Analysis of increasing efficiency of modern combined cycle power plant: A case study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 90-99.
    4. Lecompte, Steven & Huisseune, Henk & van den Broek, Martijn & Vanslambrouck, Bruno & De Paepe, Michel, 2015. "Review of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) architectures for waste heat recovery," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 448-461.
    5. Iliev, I.K. & Terziev, A.K. & Beloev, H.I. & Nikolaev, I. & Georgiev, A.G., 2021. "Comparative analysis of the energy efficiency of different types co-generators at large scales CHPs," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    6. Bassily, A.M., 2008. "Enhancing the efficiency and power of the triple-pressure reheat combined cycle by means of gas reheat, gas recuperation, and reduction of the irreversibility in the heat recovery steam generator," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(12), pages 1141-1162, December.
    7. Nami, Hossein & Ertesvåg, Ivar S. & Agromayor, Roberto & Riboldi, Luca & Nord, Lars O., 2018. "Gas turbine exhaust gas heat recovery by organic Rankine cycles (ORC) for offshore combined heat and power applications - Energy and exergy analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PB), pages 1060-1071.
    8. Sanjay, & Prasad, Bishwa N., 2013. "Energy and exergy analysis of intercooled combustion-turbine based combined cycle power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 277-284.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kazemiani-Najafabadi, Parisa & Amiri Rad, Ehsan, 2021. "Multi-objective optimization of a novel offshore CHP plant based on a 3E analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    2. Boyaghchi, Fateme Ahmadi & Molaie, Hanieh, 2015. "Advanced exergy and environmental analyses and multi objective optimization of a real combined cycle power plant with supplementary firing using evolutionary algorithm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P2), pages 2267-2279.
    3. Witanowski, Łukasz & Klonowicz, Piotr & Lampart, Piotr & Ziółkowski, Paweł, 2023. "Multi-objective optimization of the ORC axial turbine for a waste heat recovery system working in two modes: cogeneration and condensation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    4. Kotowicz, Janusz & Brzęczek, Mateusz & Job, Marcin, 2018. "The thermodynamic and economic characteristics of the modern combined cycle power plant with gas turbine steam cooling," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 359-376.
    5. Paweł Ziółkowski & Marta Drosińska-Komor & Jerzy Głuch & Łukasz Breńkacz, 2023. "Review of Methods for Diagnosing the Degradation Process in Power Units Cooperating with Renewable Energy Sources Using Artificial Intelligence," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-28, August.
    6. Nami, H. & Arabkoohsar, A., 2019. "Improving the power share of waste-driven CHP plants via parallelization with a small-scale Rankine cycle, a thermodynamic analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 27-36.
    7. Dominika Matuszewska & Piotr Olczak, 2020. "Evaluation of Using Gas Turbine to Increase Efficiency of the Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-21, March.
    8. Moreira, L.F. & Arrieta, F.R.P., 2019. "Thermal and economic assessment of organic Rankine cycles for waste heat recovery in cement plants," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 1-1.
    9. Sahu, Mithilesh Kumar & Sanjay,, 2017. "Comparative exergoeconomics of power utilities: Air-cooled gas turbine cycle and combined cycle configurations," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 42-51.
    10. Fabien Marty & Sylvain Serra & Sabine Sochard & Jean-Michel Reneaume, 2019. "Exergy Analysis and Optimization of a Combined Heat and Power Geothermal Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-22, March.
    11. Bamorovat Abadi, Gholamreza & Kim, Kyung Chun, 2017. "Investigation of organic Rankine cycles with zeotropic mixtures as a working fluid: Advantages and issues," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 1000-1013.
    12. Christoph J.W. Kirmse & Oyeniyi A. Oyewunmi & Andrew J. Haslam & Christos N. Markides, 2016. "Comparison of a Novel Organic-Fluid Thermofluidic Heat Converter and an Organic Rankine Cycle Heat Engine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-26, June.
    13. Ju-Yeol Ryu & Sungho Park & Changhyeong Lee & Seonghyeon Hwang & Jongwoong Lim, 2023. "Techno-Economic Analysis of Hydrogen–Natural Gas Blended Fuels for 400 MW Combined Cycle Power Plants (CCPPs)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-19, September.
    14. Krail, Jürgen & Beckmann, Georg & Schittl, Florian & Piringer, Gerhard, 2023. "Comparative thermodynamic analysis of an improved ORC process with integrated injection of process fluid," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    15. Yang, Wei & Bao, Jingjing & Liu, Hongtao & Zhang, Jun & Guo, Lin, 2023. "Low-grade heat to hydrogen: Current technologies, challenges and prospective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    16. Bakhshmand, Sina Kazemi & Saray, Rahim Khoshbakhti & Bahlouli, Keyvan & Eftekhari, Hajar & Ebrahimi, Afshin, 2015. "Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of a triple-pressure combined cycle plant using evolutionary algorithm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P1), pages 555-567.
    17. Kotowicz, Janusz & Brzęczek, Mateusz, 2019. "Comprehensive multivariable analysis of the possibility of an increase in the electrical efficiency of a modern combined cycle power plant with and without a CO2 capture and compression installations ," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 1100-1120.
    18. Li, Wenjia & Hao, Yong, 2017. "Efficient solar power generation combining photovoltaics and mid-/low-temperature methanol thermochemistry," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 377-385.
    19. Baccioli, A. & Antonelli, M. & Desideri, U., 2017. "Technical and economic analysis of organic flash regenerative cycles (OFRCs) for low temperature waste heat recovery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 69-87.
    20. Imran, Muhammad & Haglind, Fredrik & Asim, Muhammad & Zeb Alvi, Jahan, 2018. "Recent research trends in organic Rankine cycle technology: A bibliometric approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 552-562.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    CHP; gas turbine; HRSG; Aspen HYSYS; NOx; CO 2;
    All these keywords.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:6:p:2704-:d:1096915. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.