IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i5p2267-d1081668.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparison Study of Hydro-Compact Generators with Horizontal Spiral Turbines (HSTs) and a Three-Blade Turbine Used in Irrigation Canals

Author

Listed:
  • Wiroon Monatrakul

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand)

  • Kritsadang Senawong

    (General Education Teaching Institute, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
    Postharvest Technology Innovation Center, Science, Research and Innovation Promotion and Utilization Division, Office of the Ministry of Higher Education, Science, Research and Innovation, Bangkok 10400, Thailand)

  • Piyawat Sritram

    (Faculty of Agriculture and Technology, Rajamangala University of Technology Isan Surin Campus, Surin 32000, Thailand)

  • Ratchaphon Suntivarakorn

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand)

Abstract

This study aimed to present the experimental results of two types of turbines and attachments used in a hydro-compact generator. Two Horizontal Spiral Turbines (HSTs) with blade angles of eighteen and twenty-one degrees, respectively, and a three-blade turbine were tested and experimented in a laboratory at five levels of water flow rate ranging from 1–2 m/s. After the efficiency and torque values of each turbine were identified, they were installed in two 200 W power generator systems: (1) with a “diffuser” attachment; and (2) with an “in-line+diffuser+nozzle chamber” attachment, and tested in a local irrigation canal with 1.2 m/s. The results from the laboratory indicated that the HST with a twenty-one degree blade angle had 38.10% efficiency at the water flow rate of 2 m/s. It could reach 120.0 rpm and produced 212 Nm of torque. The results from the field experiment revealed that the combination of the power generator with the twenty-one degree blade angle HST and the in-line + diffuser + nozzle chamber attachment was the most efficient, with 284 Nm of torque at 108 rpm and could generate 67.63 W of electrical power. When the water flow rate of the irrigation canal reached 1.5 m/s, it could reach 114 rpm and generate 129.2 W. This hydro-compact generator set is suitable for irrigation canals with a water flow rate ranging from 1–1.5 m/s.

Suggested Citation

  • Wiroon Monatrakul & Kritsadang Senawong & Piyawat Sritram & Ratchaphon Suntivarakorn, 2023. "A Comparison Study of Hydro-Compact Generators with Horizontal Spiral Turbines (HSTs) and a Three-Blade Turbine Used in Irrigation Canals," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-15, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:5:p:2267-:d:1081668
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/5/2267/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/5/2267/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zitti, Gianluca & Fattore, Fernando & Brunori, Alessandro & Brunori, Bruno & Brocchini, Maurizio, 2020. "Efficiency evaluation of a ductless Archimedes turbine: Laboratory experiments and numerical simulations," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 867-879.
    2. Fernandes, Antonio Carlos & Bakhshandeh Rostami, Ali, 2015. "Hydrokinetic energy harvesting by an innovative vertical axis current turbine," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 694-706.
    3. Peter J. Schubel & Richard J. Crossley, 2012. "Wind Turbine Blade Design," Energies, MDPI, vol. 5(9), pages 1-25, September.
    4. Nyambuu, Unurjargal & Semmler, Willi, 2020. "Climate change and the transition to a low carbon economy – Carbon targets and the carbon budget," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 367-376.
    5. Khan, M.J. & Iqbal, M.T. & Quaicoe, J.E., 2008. "River current energy conversion systems: Progress, prospects and challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 12(8), pages 2177-2193, October.
    6. Filho, Geraldo Lucio Tiago & Santos, Ivan Felipe Silva dos & Barros, Regina Mambeli, 2017. "Cost estimate of small hydroelectric power plants based on the aspect factor," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 229-238.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zitti, Gianluca & Fattore, Fernando & Brunori, Alessandro & Brunori, Bruno & Brocchini, Maurizio, 2020. "Efficiency evaluation of a ductless Archimedes turbine: Laboratory experiments and numerical simulations," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 867-879.
    2. Zahra Sefidgar & Amir Ahmadi Joneidi & Ahmad Arabkoohsar, 2023. "A Comprehensive Review on Development and Applications of Cross-Flow Wind Turbines," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-39, March.
    3. Vermaak, Herman Jacobus & Kusakana, Kanzumba & Koko, Sandile Philip, 2014. "Status of micro-hydrokinetic river technology in rural applications: A review of literature," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 625-633.
    4. Nallapaneni Manoj Kumar & Aneesh A. Chand & Maria Malvoni & Kushal A. Prasad & Kabir A. Mamun & F.R. Islam & Shauhrat S. Chopra, 2020. "Distributed Energy Resources and the Application of AI, IoT, and Blockchain in Smart Grids," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-42, November.
    5. Hammar, Linus & Ehnberg, Jimmy & Mavume, Alberto & Francisco, Francisco & Molander, Sverker, 2012. "Simplified site-screening method for micro tidal current turbines applied in Mozambique," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 414-422.
    6. Reddy, K. Bheemalingeswara & Bhosale, Amit C., 2024. "Effect of number of blades on performance and wake recovery for a vertical axis helical hydrokinetic turbine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 299(C).
    7. Dylan Sheneth Edirisinghe & Ho-Seong Yang & Min-Sung Kim & Byung-Ha Kim & Sudath Prasanna Gunawardane & Young-Ho Lee, 2021. "Computational Flow Analysis on a Real Scale Run-of-River Archimedes Screw Turbine with a High Incline Angle," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-18, June.
    8. Michał Pacholczyk & Dariusz Karkosiński, 2020. "Parametric Study on a Performance of a Small Counter-Rotating Wind Turbine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-17, July.
    9. Kamal, Md. Mustafa & Saini, R.P., 2023. "Performance investigations of hybrid hydrokinetic turbine rotor with different system and operating parameters," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    10. Rostami, Ali Bakhshandeh & Armandei, Mohammadmehdi, 2017. "Renewable energy harvesting by vortex-induced motions: Review and benchmarking of technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 193-214.
    11. Mansoor Ahmed Zaib & Arbaz Waqar & Shoukat Abbas & Saeed Badshah & Sajjad Ahmad & Muhammad Amjad & Seyed Saeid Rahimian Koloor & Mohamed Eldessouki, 2022. "Effect of Blade Diameter on the Performance of Horizontal-Axis Ocean Current Turbine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-13, July.
    12. Dhakal, Sagar & Timilsina, Ashesh B. & Dhakal, Rabin & Fuyal, Dinesh & Bajracharya, Tri R. & Pandit, Hari P. & Amatya, Nagendra & Nakarmi, Amrit M., 2015. "Comparison of cylindrical and conical basins with optimum position of runner: Gravitational water vortex power plant," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 662-669.
    13. Unai Elosegui & Igor Egana & Alain Ulazia & Gabriel Ibarra-Berastegi, 2018. "Pitch Angle Misalignment Correction Based on Benchmarking and Laser Scanner Measurement in Wind Farms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-20, December.
    14. Khan, M.J. & Bhuyan, G. & Iqbal, M.T. & Quaicoe, J.E., 2009. "Hydrokinetic energy conversion systems and assessment of horizontal and vertical axis turbines for river and tidal applications: A technology status review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(10), pages 1823-1835, October.
    15. Elbatran, A.H. & Ahmed, Yasser M. & Shehata, Ahmed S., 2017. "Performance study of ducted nozzle Savonius water turbine, comparison with conventional Savonius turbine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 566-584.
    16. John, Bony & Varghese, James, 2021. "Sizing and techno-economic analysis of hydrokinetic turbine based standalone hybrid energy systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    17. Ye, Huiying & Liao, Hua & Zheng, Guoliang & Peng, Ying, 2024. "Industrialization, environmental externality, and climate mitigation strategies," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    18. Gbalimene Richard Ileberi & Pu Li, 2023. "Integrating Hydrokinetic Energy into Hybrid Renewable Energy System: Optimal Design and Comparative Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-28, April.
    19. Liu, Xiong & Lu, Cheng & Liang, Shi & Godbole, Ajit & Chen, Yan, 2017. "Vibration-induced aerodynamic loads on large horizontal axis wind turbine blades," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(P2), pages 1109-1119.
    20. Rudimar Caricimi & Géremi Gilson Dranka & Dalmarino Setti & Paula Ferreira, 2022. "Reframing the Selection of Hydraulic Turbines Integrating Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Fuzzy VIKOR Multi-Criteria Methods," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-26, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:5:p:2267-:d:1081668. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.