IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i5p2207-d1079587.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Experimental Comparison of Functionality between the Main Types of Methane Measurement Sensors in Mines

Author

Listed:
  • José Luis Lorenzo-Bayona

    (Department of Energy and Fuels, E.T.S. Ingenieros de Minas y Energía, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Ríos Rosas 21, 28003 Madrid, Spain
    Laboratorio Oficial Madariaga, LOM (UPM Technical University of Madrid, Spain), C/Eric Kandel, 1 e (TECNOGETAFE), Parque Científico y Tecnológico de la UPM, 28906 Getafe, Spain)

  • David León

    (Department of Energy and Fuels, E.T.S. Ingenieros de Minas y Energía, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Ríos Rosas 21, 28003 Madrid, Spain
    Laboratorio Oficial Madariaga, LOM (UPM Technical University of Madrid, Spain), C/Eric Kandel, 1 e (TECNOGETAFE), Parque Científico y Tecnológico de la UPM, 28906 Getafe, Spain)

  • Isabel Amez

    (Department of Energy and Fuels, E.T.S. Ingenieros de Minas y Energía, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Ríos Rosas 21, 28003 Madrid, Spain
    Laboratorio Oficial Madariaga, LOM (UPM Technical University of Madrid, Spain), C/Eric Kandel, 1 e (TECNOGETAFE), Parque Científico y Tecnológico de la UPM, 28906 Getafe, Spain)

  • Blanca Castells

    (Department of Energy and Fuels, E.T.S. Ingenieros de Minas y Energía, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Ríos Rosas 21, 28003 Madrid, Spain
    Laboratorio Oficial Madariaga, LOM (UPM Technical University of Madrid, Spain), C/Eric Kandel, 1 e (TECNOGETAFE), Parque Científico y Tecnológico de la UPM, 28906 Getafe, Spain)

  • Ljiljana Medic

    (Department of Energy and Fuels, E.T.S. Ingenieros de Minas y Energía, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Ríos Rosas 21, 28003 Madrid, Spain
    Laboratorio Oficial Madariaga, LOM (UPM Technical University of Madrid, Spain), C/Eric Kandel, 1 e (TECNOGETAFE), Parque Científico y Tecnológico de la UPM, 28906 Getafe, Spain)

Abstract

In recent years, coal mine methane measurement techniques in mines have been gaining importance as poor firedamp control in work can cause the interruption of production and even fatal accidents. Since there is currently a variety of methane measurement equipment with different functional characteristics and measurement principles, a study is needed to indicate which type of equipment has the highest degree of confidence. This research presents the results of a study carried out by the Official Laboratory J. M. Madariaga (LOM) of the Polytechnic University of Madrid that aims to analyze the reliability of methane detection systems used in underground mining. Therefore, a series of portable and non-portable methane detectors with different measurement principles have been selected to subject them to laboratory tests following the methods described in the applicable regulations, such as time of response, dust effect, temperature, pressure, etc. The test equipment is usually the one used in the certification and calibration of these devices, subject to the LOM quality system. The results of these tests allowed for defining a marking system that led to a ranking of the tested methane detectors in order to find the advantages and disadvantages of each type. From the performed tests, a summary of the main sources of sensor inaccuracy was reported. It was found that catalytic sensors might present significant deviations when testing high concentrations in short periods of time or low concentrations during long periods of time. On the other hand, devices with an interferometric sensor can be unreliable as the measures are very sensitive to changes in environmental conditions, and optical sensors present longer response times than catalytic sensors.

Suggested Citation

  • José Luis Lorenzo-Bayona & David León & Isabel Amez & Blanca Castells & Ljiljana Medic, 2023. "Experimental Comparison of Functionality between the Main Types of Methane Measurement Sensors in Mines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-24, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:5:p:2207-:d:1079587
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/5/2207/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/5/2207/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhao, Weizhong & Su, Xianbo & Xia, Daping & Hou, Shihui & Wang, Qian & Zhou, Yixuan, 2022. "Enhanced coalbed methane recovery by the modification of coal reservoir under the supercritical CO2 extraction and anaerobic digestion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    2. Jonek-Kowalska, Izabela, 2022. "Towards the reduction of CO2 emissions. Paths of pro-ecological transformation of energy mixes in European countries with an above-average share of coal in energy consumption," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    3. Baltazar Solano Rodriguez & Paul Drummond & Paul Ekins, 2017. "Decarbonizing the EU energy system by 2050: an important role for BECCS," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(0), pages 93-110, June.
    4. Gatnar, Kazimierz & Tor, Andrzej, 2003. "Drainage and economic utilization of methane from coal seams in the Jastrzebie mining-field," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 74(3-4), pages 331-341, March.
    5. Gareth A. S. Edwards, 2019. "Coal and climate change," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 10(5), September.
    6. Barbara Uliasz-Misiak & Jacek Misiak & Joanna Lewandowska-Śmierzchalska & Rafał Matuła, 2020. "Environmental Risk Related to the Exploration and Exploitation of Coalbed Methane," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-13, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kuang, Yucen & Jiang, Tao & Wu, Longqi & Liu, Xiaoqian & Yang, Xuke & Sher, Farooq & Wei, Zhifang & Zhang, Shengfu, 2023. "High-temperature rheological behavior and non-isothermal pyrolysis mechanism of macerals separated from different coals," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    2. Caiwei Fan & Kongyou Wu & Jun Li, 2023. "A New Methodology Combining Geophysical Calculations and Geological Analysis to Identify and Characterize Carrier Systems for Vertical Hydrocarbon Migration in the Central Diapir Zone of the Yinggehai," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-17, February.
    3. Stephan Kigle & Michael Ebner & Andrej Guminski, 2022. "Greenhouse Gas Abatement in EUROPE—A Scenario-Based, Bottom-Up Analysis Showing the Effect of Deep Emission Mitigation on the European Energy System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-18, February.
    4. Le, Anh-Tuan & Tran, Thao Phuong & Mishra, Anil V., 2023. "Climate risk and bank stability: International evidence," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 70.
    5. Lei, Nuoa & Masanet, Eric, 2020. "Statistical analysis for predicting location-specific data center PUE and its improvement potential," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    6. Ángel Galán-Martín & Daniel Vázquez & Selene Cobo & Niall Dowell & José Antonio Caballero & Gonzalo Guillén-Gosálbez, 2021. "Delaying carbon dioxide removal in the European Union puts climate targets at risk," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, December.
    7. Müller-Hansen, Finn & Lee, Yuan Ting & Callaghan, Max & Jankin, Slava & Minx, Jan C., 2022. "The German coal debate on Twitter: Reactions to a corporate policy process," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    8. Oei, Pao-Yu & Hermann, Hauke & Herpich, Philipp & Holtemöller, Oliver & Lünenbürger, Benjamin & Schult, Christoph, 2020. "Coal phase-out in Germany – Implications and policies for affected regions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    9. Beccarello, Massimo & Di Foggia, Giacomo, 2023. "Meeting decarbonization targets: Techno-economic insights from the Italian scenario," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 2.
    10. Coskun Yildiz & Marcel Richter & Jochen Ströhle & Bernd Epple, 2023. "Release of Sulfur and Chlorine Gas Species during Combustion and Pyrolysis of Walnut Shells in an Entrained Flow Reactor," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-18, July.
    11. Wei Li & Weili Lin & Hongfu Liu & Xiaoxia Song & Zhenji Wei, 2023. "Influence of Supercritical CO 2 Fluid on CH 4 and CO 2 Diffusion in Vitrinite-Rich Coals and Inertinite-Rich Coals," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-15, February.
    12. Xie, Pinjie & Gong, Ningyu & Sun, Feihu & Li, Pin & Pan, Xianyou, 2023. "What factors contribute to the extent of decoupling economic growth and energy carbon emissions in China?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    13. Haider Mahmood & Ateeq ur Rehman Irshad & Muhammad Tanveer, 2024. "Do innovation and renewable energy transition play their role in environmental sustainability in Western Europe?," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-9, December.
    14. Malladi, Krishna Teja & Sowlati, Taraneh, 2020. "Impact of carbon pricing policies on the cost and emission of the biomass supply chain: Optimization models and a case study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    15. Jagu Schippers, Emma & Massol, Olivier, 2022. "Unlocking CO2 infrastructure deployment: The impact of carbon removal accounting," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    16. Polzin, Friedemann & Sanders, Mark, 2020. "How to finance the transition to low-carbon energy in Europe?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    17. Charli Sitinjak & Sitinjak Ebennezer & Józef Ober, 2023. "Exploring Public Attitudes and Acceptance of CCUS Technologies in JABODETABEK: A Cross-Sectional Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-15, May.
    18. Tongqiang, Xia & Diao, Li & Xiaolin, Li & Xin, Yan & J.G., Wang, 2024. "A novel in-depth intelligent evaluation approach for the gas drainage effect from point monitoring to surface to volume," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 353(PB).
    19. Jin-Li Hu & Min-Yueh Chuang, 2023. "The Importance of Energy Prosumers for Affordable and Clean Energy Development: A Review of the Literature from the Viewpoints of Management and Policy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-16, August.
    20. Duncan McLaren, 2020. "Quantifying the potential scale of mitigation deterrence from greenhouse gas removal techniques," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 162(4), pages 2411-2428, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:5:p:2207-:d:1079587. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.