IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i24p7956-d1296043.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Selection of the Utility Function of the Historic Building, Taking into Account Energy Efficiency

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Shymanska

    (Faculty of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Cracow University of Technology, 31-155 Krakow, Poland)

  • Alicja Kowalska-Koczwara

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering, Cracow University of Technology, 31-155 Krakow, Poland)

  • Małgorzata Fedorczak-Cisak

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering, Cracow University of Technology, 31-155 Krakow, Poland)

Abstract

The energy efficiency of the building should be understood as the degree of preparation of the building to ensure the comfort of its use in accordance with its intended use with the lowest possible energy consumption of the building. The article presents an in-depth analysis of the possibility of changing the utility function of a historic building in such a way that ensures all aspects of comfort while meeting energy efficiency conditions. Combinatorics methods were used for this purpose. Four possible utility functions were proposed, including the reference state, i.e., the existing state. Five aspects of comfort were considered: thermal comfort, carbon footprint, energy efficiency, noise and vibration. For these five aspects of comfort, boundary conditions were adopted depending on the adopted building class. The selected utility function is therefore the result of comfort, energy efficiency and economic aspects. The purpose of the study was to verify whether the developed methodology for the selection of the utility function for historic buildings, based on combinatorial analyses, would allow the selection of the optimal function from the point of view of energy efficiency, user comfort and environmental impact. The methodology was tested on a historic building located in southern Poland. The new utility function for the analyzed building is to use the historic villa (or some part of it) as an Art Gallery.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Shymanska & Alicja Kowalska-Koczwara & Małgorzata Fedorczak-Cisak, 2023. "Selection of the Utility Function of the Historic Building, Taking into Account Energy Efficiency," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-14, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:24:p:7956-:d:1296043
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/24/7956/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/24/7956/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sonia I. Seneviratne & Markus G. Donat & Andy J. Pitman & Reto Knutti & Robert L. Wilby, 2016. "Allowable CO2 emissions based on regional and impact-related climate targets," Nature, Nature, vol. 529(7587), pages 477-483, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carl-Friedrich Schleussner & Joeri Rogelj & Michiel Schaeffer & Tabea Lissner & Rachel Licker & Erich M. Fischer & Reto Knutti & Anders Levermann & Katja Frieler & William Hare, 2016. "Science and policy characteristics of the Paris Agreement temperature goal," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 6(9), pages 827-835, September.
    2. Yuhong Zhao & Ruirui Liu & Zhansheng Liu & Liang Liu & Jingjing Wang & Wenxiang Liu, 2023. "A Review of Macroscopic Carbon Emission Prediction Model Based on Machine Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-28, April.
    3. Yang, Jun & Hao, Yun & Feng, Chao, 2021. "A race between economic growth and carbon emissions: What play important roles towards global low-carbon development?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    4. Christopher W. Callahan & Justin S. Mankin, 2022. "National attribution of historical climate damages," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 172(3), pages 1-19, June.
    5. Luke J. Harrington & Carl-Friedrich Schleussner & Friederike E. L. Otto, 2021. "Quantifying uncertainty in aggregated climate change risk assessments," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-10, December.
    6. Mohammed Magdy Hamed & Mohamed Salem Nashwan & Tarmizi bin Ismail & Shamsuddin Shahid, 2022. "Projection of Thermal Bioclimate of Egypt for the Paris Agreement Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-19, October.
    7. Meng, Fanxin & Liu, Gengyuan & Hu, Yuanchao & Su, Meirong & Yang, Zhifeng, 2018. "Urban carbon flow and structure analysis in a multi-scales economy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 553-564.
    8. Hanan Ali Alrteimei & Zulfa Hanan Ash’aari & Farrah Melissa Muharram, 2022. "Last Decade Assessment of the Impacts of Regional Climate Change on Crop Yield Variations in the Mediterranean Region," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-21, October.
    9. Zhang, Pan & Tian, XiangFeng & Fu, Dong, 2018. "CO2 removal in tray tower by using AAILs activated MDEA aqueous solution," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 1122-1132.
    10. Yupei Lai & Yutong Li & Xinyi Feng & Tao Ma, 2022. "Green retrofit of existing residential buildings in China: An investigation on residents’ perceptions," Energy & Environment, , vol. 33(2), pages 332-353, March.
    11. Yizhou Dai & Huan Li & Chuanhao Wang & Weiqing Xue & Menglu Zhang & Donghao Zhao & Jing Xue & Jiawei Li & Laihao Luo & Chunxiao Liu & Xu Li & Peixin Cui & Qiu Jiang & Tingting Zheng & Songqi Gu & Yao , 2023. "Manipulating local coordination of copper single atom catalyst enables efficient CO2-to-CH4 conversion," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, December.
    12. Oschlies, Andreas & Held, Hermann & Keller, David & Keller, Klaus & Mengis, Nadine & Quaas, Martin & Rickels, Wilfried & Schmidt, Hauke, 2017. "Indicators and Metrics for the Assessment of Climate Engineering," Open Access Publications from Kiel Institute for the World Economy 226354, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    13. Shang, Yizi & Hei, Pengfei & Lu, Shibao & Shang, Ling & Li, Xiaofei & Wei, Yongping & Jia, Dongdong & Jiang, Dong & Ye, Yuntao & Gong, Jiaguo & Lei, Xiaohui & Hao, Mengmeng & Qiu, Yaqin & Liu, Jiahong, 2018. "China’s energy-water nexus: Assessing water conservation synergies of the total coal consumption cap strategy until 2050," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 643-660.
    14. Fragkos, Panagiotis & Fragkiadakis, Kostas & Paroussos, Leonidas & Pierfederici, Roberta & Vishwanathan, Saritha S. & Köberle, Alexandre C. & Iyer, Gokul & He, Chen-Min & Oshiro, Ken, 2018. "Coupling national and global models to explore policy impacts of NDCs," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 462-473.
    15. Weihao Huang & Qifan Xu, 2024. "Sustainable-Driven Renovation of Existing Residential Buildings in China: A Systematic Exploration Based on Review and Solution Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-35, May.
    16. Akemi Tanaka & Kiyoshi Takahashi & Hideo Shiogama & Naota Hanasaki & Yoshimitsu Masaki & Akihiko Ito & Hibiki Noda & Yasuaki Hijioka & Seita Emori, 2017. "On the scaling of climate impact indicators with global mean temperature increase: a case study of terrestrial ecosystems and water resources," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 141(4), pages 775-782, April.
    17. Zhong, Mei-Rui & Xiao, Shun-Li & Zou, Han & Zhang, Yi-Jun & Song, Yi, 2021. "The effects of technical change on carbon intensity in China’s non-ferrous metal industry," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    18. Gaupp, Franziska & Hall, Jim & Mitchell, Dann & Dadson, Simon, 2019. "Increasing risks of multiple breadbasket failure under 1.5 and 2 °C global warming," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 34-45.
    19. Boyce, James K., 2018. "Carbon Pricing: Effectiveness and Equity," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 52-61.
    20. Declan Conway & Robert J. Nicholls & Sally Brown & Mark G. L. Tebboth & William Neil Adger & Bashir Ahmad & Hester Biemans & Florence Crick & Arthur F. Lutz & Ricardo Safra Campos & Mohammed Said & Ch, 2019. "The need for bottom-up assessments of climate risks and adaptation in climate-sensitive regions," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 9(7), pages 503-511, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:24:p:7956-:d:1296043. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.