IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i20p7180-d1264301.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Leveraging Behavioral Correlation in Distribution System State Estimation for the Recognition of Critical System States

Author

Listed:
  • Eva Buchta

    (Technology, Sustainable Energy & Infrastructure, Siemens AG, 91056 Erlangen, Germany
    Technology and Economics of Multimodal Energy Systems, Technical University of Darmstadt, 64289 Darmstadt, Germany)

  • Mathias Duckheim

    (Technology, Sustainable Energy & Infrastructure, Siemens AG, 91056 Erlangen, Germany)

  • Michael Metzger

    (Technology, Sustainable Energy & Infrastructure, Siemens AG, 81739 Munich, Germany)

  • Paul Stursberg

    (Technology, Sustainable Energy & Infrastructure, Siemens AG, 81739 Munich, Germany)

  • Stefan Niessen

    (Technology, Sustainable Energy & Infrastructure, Siemens AG, 91056 Erlangen, Germany
    Technology and Economics of Multimodal Energy Systems, Technical University of Darmstadt, 64289 Darmstadt, Germany)

Abstract

State estimation for distribution systems faces the challenge of dealing with limited real-time measurements and historical data. This work describes a Bayesian state estimation approach tailored for practical implementation in different data availability scenarios, especially when both real-time and historical data are scarce. The approach leverages statistical correlations of the state variables from a twofold origin: (1) from the physical coupling through the grid and (2) from similar behavioral patterns of customers. We show how these correlations can be parameterized, especially when no historical time series data are available, and that accounting for these correlations yields substantial accuracy gains for state estimation and for the recognition of critical system states, i.e., states with voltage or current limit violations. In a case study, the approach is tested in a realistic European-type, medium-voltage grid. The method accurately recognizes critical system states with an aggregated true positive rate of 98%. Compared to widely used approaches that do not consider these correlations, the number of undetected true critical cases can be reduced by a factor of up to 9. Particularly in the case where no historical smart meter time series data is available, the recognition accuracy of critical system states is nearly as high as with full smart meter coverage.

Suggested Citation

  • Eva Buchta & Mathias Duckheim & Michael Metzger & Paul Stursberg & Stefan Niessen, 2023. "Leveraging Behavioral Correlation in Distribution System State Estimation for the Recognition of Critical System States," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-21, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:20:p:7180-:d:1264301
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/20/7180/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/20/7180/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Steffen Meinecke & Džanan Sarajlić & Simon Ruben Drauz & Annika Klettke & Lars-Peter Lauven & Christian Rehtanz & Albert Moser & Martin Braun, 2020. "SimBench—A Benchmark Dataset of Electric Power Systems to Compare Innovative Solutions Based on Power Flow Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-19, June.
    2. Sepideh Radhoush & Maryam Bahramipanah & Hashem Nehrir & Zagros Shahooei, 2022. "A Review on State Estimation Techniques in Active Distribution Networks: Existing Practices and Their Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-16, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yu Shi & Yueting Hou & Yue Yu & Zhaoyang Jin & Mohamed A. Mohamed, 2023. "Robust Power System State Estimation Method Based on Generalized M-Estimation of Optimized Parameters Based on Sampling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-18, January.
    2. Stute, Judith & Klobasa, Marian, 2024. "How do dynamic electricity tariffs and different grid charge designs interact? - Implications for residential consumers and grid reinforcement requirements," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    3. Paolo Tenti & Tommaso Caldognetto, 2023. "Integration of Local and Central Control Empowers Cooperation among Prosumers and Distributors towards Safe, Efficient, and Cost-Effective Operation of Microgrids," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-23, February.
    4. Zhang, Haoyang & Zhan, Sen & Kok, Koen & Paterakis, Nikolaos G., 2024. "Establishing a hierarchical local market structure using multi-cut Benders decomposition," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 363(C).
    5. Steffen Meinecke & Leon Thurner & Martin Braun, 2020. "Review of Steady-State Electric Power Distribution System Datasets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-17, September.
    6. Carlo Schmitt & Felix Gaumnitz & Andreas Blank & Olivier Rebenaque & Théo Dronne & Arnault Martin & Philippe Vassilopoulos & Albert Moser & Fabien Roques, 2021. "Framework for Deterministic Assessment of Risk-Averse Participation in Local Flexibility Markets †," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-34, May.
    7. Florian Schäfer & Martin Braun, 2020. "Multi-Year High-Voltage Power System Planning Considering Active Power Curtailment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-15, September.
    8. Sebastian Schreck & Robin Sudhoff & Sebastian Thiem & Stefan Niessen, 2022. "On the Importance of Grid Tariff Designs in Local Energy Markets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-25, August.
    9. Sepideh Radhoush & Bradley M. Whitaker & Hashem Nehrir, 2023. "An Overview of Supervised Machine Learning Approaches for Applications in Active Distribution Networks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-29, August.
    10. Robin Sudhoff & Sebastian Schreck & Sebastian Thiem & Stefan Niessen, 2022. "Operating Renewable Energy Communities to Reduce Power Peaks in the Distribution Grid: An Analysis on Grid-Friendliness, Different Shares of Participants, and Economic Benefits," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-18, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:20:p:7180-:d:1264301. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.