IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i20p7153-d1263000.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeled and Measured Operating Temperatures of Floating PV Modules: A Comparison

Author

Listed:
  • Maarten Dörenkämper

    (TNO Energy and Materials Transition, High Tech Campus 21, 5656 AE Eindhoven, The Netherlands)

  • Minne M. de Jong

    (TNO Energy and Materials Transition, High Tech Campus 21, 5656 AE Eindhoven, The Netherlands)

  • Jan Kroon

    (TNO Energy and Materials Transition, High Tech Campus 21, 5656 AE Eindhoven, The Netherlands)

  • Vilde Stueland Nysted

    (Department of Solar Power Systems, Institutt for Energiteknikk (IFE), Insituttveien 18, 2007 Kjeller, Norway)

  • Josefine Selj

    (Department of Solar Power Systems, Institutt for Energiteknikk (IFE), Insituttveien 18, 2007 Kjeller, Norway)

  • Torunn Kjeldstad

    (Department of Solar Power Systems, Institutt for Energiteknikk (IFE), Insituttveien 18, 2007 Kjeller, Norway)

Abstract

The power output of a photovoltaic system is dependent on the operating temperature of the solar cells. For floating PV (FPV), increased wind speeds can result in increased yield due to lowered operating temperatures, which has long been stated as a key advantage for FPV. So far, this effect has not been included in commercial software packages for yield estimation. Typically, only standard settings are provided, taking into account the mounting type (PVsyst) or mounting and module type (Sandia). This may result in an underestimation of the yield, and consequently, the estimated Levelized Cost of Electricity (LCOE) of the FPV project. In this study, a linkage between recorded module temperatures from FPV systems located in The Netherlands and Sri Lanka and the prevalent models employed within PVsyst and Sandia software for estimating module temperatures are established. Our findings reveal that the models within PVsyst and Sandia tend to overestimate module temperatures by 2.4% and 3%, respectively, for each 1 m/s increment in wind speed. We present two methods for determining the single heat loss coefficient, or U-value, tailored to specific sites accounting for local wind conditions. The first method computes the U-value based on the average monthly wind speed, whereas the second employs the irradiance-weighted average monthly wind speed. The latter method can be advantageous for locations characterized by significant fluctuations in wind speeds between night and day. Through a statistical residual analysis comparing measured and modeled module temperatures, we demonstrate that our proposed methods offer a more accurate representation of module temperature compared to the PVsyst and Sandia models when default settings are used. When we subsequently compute the specific yield using both measured and modeled temperatures, we observe that the approach using irradiance-weighted average wind speed shows a higher yield of up to 2% compared to the traditional methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Maarten Dörenkämper & Minne M. de Jong & Jan Kroon & Vilde Stueland Nysted & Josefine Selj & Torunn Kjeldstad, 2023. "Modeled and Measured Operating Temperatures of Floating PV Modules: A Comparison," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-18, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:20:p:7153-:d:1263000
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/20/7153/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/20/7153/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Socrates Kaplanis & Eleni Kaplani & John K. Kaldellis, 2023. "PV Temperature Prediction Incorporating the Effect of Humidity and Cooling Due to Seawater Flow and Evaporation on Modules Simulating Floating PV Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-19, June.
    2. Waithiru Charles Lawrence Kamuyu & Jong Rok Lim & Chang Sub Won & Hyung Keun Ahn, 2018. "Prediction Model of Photovoltaic Module Temperature for Power Performance of Floating PVs," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-13, February.
    3. Skoplaki, E. & Palyvos, J.A., 2009. "Operating temperature of photovoltaic modules: A survey of pertinent correlations," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 23-29.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Monica Nicola & Matthew Berwind, 2024. "Improving Module Temperature Prediction Models for Floating Photovoltaic Systems: Analytical Insights from Operational Data," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-17, August.
    2. Maarten Dörenkämper & Simona Villa & Jan Kroon & Minne M. de Jong, 2024. "The Impact of System Sizing and Water Temperature on the Thermal Characteristics of Floating Photovoltaic Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-13, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ahmad Hasan & Sarah Josephine McCormack & Ming Jun Huang & Brian Norton, 2014. "Energy and Cost Saving of a Photovoltaic-Phase Change Materials (PV-PCM) System through Temperature Regulation and Performance Enhancement of Photovoltaics," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-14, March.
    2. Assoa, Y.B. & Levrard, D., 2020. "A lightweight triangular building integrated photovoltaic module," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    3. Daniel Matulić & Željko Andabaka & Sanja Radman & Goran Fruk & Josip Leto & Jakša Rošin & Mirta Rastija & Ivana Varga & Tea Tomljanović & Hrvoje Čeprnja & Marko Karoglan, 2023. "Agrivoltaics and Aquavoltaics: Potential of Solar Energy Use in Agriculture and Freshwater Aquaculture in Croatia," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-26, July.
    4. Rustemli, Sabir & Dincer, Furkan & Unal, Emin & Karaaslan, Muharrem & Sabah, Cumali, 2013. "The analysis on sun tracking and cooling systems for photovoltaic panels," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 598-603.
    5. Sripadmanabhan Indira, Sridhar & Aravind Vaithilingam, Chockalingam & Sivasubramanian, Ramsundar & Chong, Kok-Keong & Narasingamurthi, Kulasekharan & Saidur, R., 2022. "Prototype of a novel hybrid concentrator photovoltaic/thermal and solar thermoelectric generator system for outdoor study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(P1), pages 224-239.
    6. Thopil, George Alex & Sachse, Christiaan Eddie & Lalk, Jörg & Thopil, Miriam Sara, 2020. "Techno-economic performance comparison of crystalline and thin film PV panels under varying meteorological conditions: A high solar resource southern hemisphere case," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    7. Krzysztof Barbusiński & Paweł Kwaśnicki & Anna Gronba-Chyła & Agnieszka Generowicz & Józef Ciuła & Bartosz Szeląg & Francesco Fatone & Agnieszka Makara & Zygmunt Kowalski, 2024. "Influence of Environmental Conditions on the Electrical Parameters of Side Connectors in Glass–Glass Photovoltaic Modules," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-13, January.
    8. Chiacchio, Ferdinando & D’Urso, Diego & Famoso, Fabio & Brusca, Sebastian & Aizpurua, Jose Ignacio & Catterson, Victoria M., 2018. "On the use of dynamic reliability for an accurate modelling of renewable power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 605-621.
    9. Rawat, Rahul & Kaushik, S.C. & Lamba, Ravita, 2016. "A review on modeling, design methodology and size optimization of photovoltaic based water pumping, standalone and grid connected system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 1506-1519.
    10. Rahaman, Md Atiqur & Chambers, Terrence L. & Fekih, Afef & Wiecheteck, Giovana & Carranza, Gabriel & Possetti, Gustavo Rafael Collere, 2023. "Floating photovoltaic module temperature estimation: Modeling and comparison," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 162-180.
    11. Chatzipanagi, Anatoli & Frontini, Francesco & Virtuani, Alessandro, 2016. "BIPV-temp: A demonstrative Building Integrated Photovoltaic installation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 1-12.
    12. Teodoro Semeraro & Roberta Aretano & Amilcare Barca & Alessandro Pomes & Cecilia Del Giudice & Elisa Gatto & Marcello Lenucci & Riccardo Buccolieri & Rohinton Emmanuel & Zhi Gao & Alessandra Scognamig, 2020. "A Conceptual Framework to Design Green Infrastructure: Ecosystem Services as an Opportunity for Creating Shared Value in Ground Photovoltaic Systems," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-28, July.
    13. Chang-Gi Min & Jong Keun Park & Don Hur & Mun-Kyeom Kim, 2015. "The Economic Viability of Renewable Portfolio Standard Support for Offshore Wind Farm Projects in Korea," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-20, September.
    14. Quesada, B. & Sánchez, C. & Cañada, J. & Royo, R. & Payá, J., 2011. "Experimental results and simulation with TRNSYS of a 7.2Â kWp grid-connected photovoltaic system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(5), pages 1772-1783, May.
    15. Roumpakias, Elias & Zogou, Olympia & Stamatelos, Anastassios, 2015. "Correlation of actual efficiency of photovoltaic panels with air mass," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 70-77.
    16. Deveci, Muhammet & Pamucar, Dragan & Oguz, Elif, 2022. "Floating photovoltaic site selection using fuzzy rough numbers based LAAW and RAFSI model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 324(C).
    17. Pang, Wei & Cui, Yanan & Zhang, Qian & Wilson, Gregory.J. & Yan, Hui, 2020. "A comparative analysis on performances of flat plate photovoltaic/thermal collectors in view of operating media, structural designs, and climate conditions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    18. Henrik Zsiborács & Gábor Pintér & Attila Bai & József Popp & Zoltán Gabnai & Béla Pályi & István Farkas & Nóra Hegedűsné Baranyai & Christian Gützer & Heidelinde Trimmel & Sandro Oswald & Philipp Weih, 2018. "Comparison of Thermal Models for Ground-Mounted South-Facing Photovoltaic Technologies: A Practical Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-18, May.
    19. Suzana Domjan & Lenart Petek & Ciril Arkar & Sašo Medved, 2020. "Experimental Study on Energy Efficiency of Multi-Functional BIPV Glazed Façade Structure during Heating Season," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-19, June.
    20. Ranjbaran, Parisa & Yousefi, Hossein & Gharehpetian, G.B. & Astaraei, Fatemeh Razi, 2019. "A review on floating photovoltaic (FPV) power generation units," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 332-347.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:20:p:7153-:d:1263000. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.