IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i20p7140-d1262537.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Forest Supply Chain for Bioenergy: An Approach for Biomass Study in the Framework of a Circular Bioeconomy

Author

Listed:
  • Silvina M. Manrique

    (Instituto de Investigaciones en Energía No Convencional (INENCO, UNSa–CONICET), Universidad Nacional de Salta, Av. Bolivia 5150, Salta CP A4400FVY, Argentina
    Departamento de Geología, Geografía y Medio Ambiente, Universidad de Alcalá, 28871 Madrid, Spain
    Red Iberoamericana de Tecnologías de Biomasa y Bioenergía Rural (ReBiBiR-T), Programa Iberoamericano de Ciencia y Tecnología para el Desarrollo (CYTED), Amaniel 4, 28015 Madrid, Spain)

  • Carolina R. Subelza

    (Instituto de Investigaciones en Energía No Convencional (INENCO, UNSa–CONICET), Universidad Nacional de Salta, Av. Bolivia 5150, Salta CP A4400FVY, Argentina
    Red Iberoamericana de Tecnologías de Biomasa y Bioenergía Rural (ReBiBiR-T), Programa Iberoamericano de Ciencia y Tecnología para el Desarrollo (CYTED), Amaniel 4, 28015 Madrid, Spain)

  • María Antonia Toro

    (Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Consejo de Investigaciones de la Universidad Nacional de Salta (CIUNSa-UNSa), Av. Bolivia 5150, Salta CP A4400FVY, Argentina)

  • Quelbis R. Quintero Bertel

    (Grupo de Investigación Bioindustrias, Departamento de Ingeniería Agrícola, Universidad de Sucre, Cra 28, 5-267, Barrio Puerta Roja, Sincelejo 700001, Colombia)

  • Raúl J. Tauro

    (Escuela Nacional de Estudios Superiores (ENES), Unidad Morelia, Laboratorio de Contaminación y Salud Ambiental, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Antigua Carretera a Pátzcuaro 8701, Exhacienda de San José de la Huerta, Morelia 58190, Mexico
    Programa Investigadores por México, Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACYT), Av. Insurgentes Sur 1582, Col. Crédito Constructor, Alcaldía Benito Juárez 03940, Mexico)

Abstract

To ensure the long-term viability of a circular bioeconomy based on native forests, it is crucial to enhance our understanding and overcome existing disparities in knowledge and application throughout the entire value chain of forest products. The objective of this article is to contribute towards this goal and facilitate the proper management of forest biomass. Firstly, a methodology is proposed for the study of biomass throughout the native forest value chain, identifying the main steps, criteria, and variables to consider. This approach is evaluated through a case study in Argentina, where over 2370 tons of biomass are wasted annually. A series of strategies for analyzing the most suitable uses and applications for this biomass are examined. Finally, some key approaches for the promotion of a circular and sustainable forest bioeconomy are identified. While it is true that there is still a long way to go before small rural economies can make a more efficient and comprehensive use of their resources (potentially including small biorefineries) with appropriate cascade use schemes, moving towards biomass energy use constitutes a practical and concrete alternative today. This proposal provides tools for accelerating this necessary ecological and energy transition.

Suggested Citation

  • Silvina M. Manrique & Carolina R. Subelza & María Antonia Toro & Quelbis R. Quintero Bertel & Raúl J. Tauro, 2023. "Forest Supply Chain for Bioenergy: An Approach for Biomass Study in the Framework of a Circular Bioeconomy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-25, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:20:p:7140-:d:1262537
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/20/7140/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/20/7140/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Singh, Jaswinder, 2015. "Overview of electric power potential of surplus agricultural biomass from economic, social, environmental and technical perspective—A case study of Punjab," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 286-297.
    2. Ayaovi Locoh & Évelyne Thiffault & Simon Barnabé, 2022. "Sustainability Impact Assessment of Forest Bioenergy Value Chains in Quebec (Canada)—A ToSIA Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-21, September.
    3. Jarre, Matteo & Petit-Boix, Anna & Priefer, Carmen & Meyer, Rolf & Leipold, Sina, 2020. "Transforming the bio-based sector towards a circular economy - What can we learn from wood cascading?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    4. Pulidindi, Indra Neel & Kimchi, Baruchi B. & Gedanken, Aharon, 2014. "Can cellulose be a sustainable feedstock for bioethanol production?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 77-80.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ana Arias & Sara González‐García & Gumersindo Feijoo & Maria Teresa Moreira, 2022. "Tannin‐based bio‐adhesives for the wood panel industry as sustainable alternatives to petrochemical resins," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(2), pages 627-642, April.
    2. Zailan, Roziah & Lim, Jeng Shiun & Manan, Zainuddin Abdul & Alwi, Sharifah Rafidah Wan & Mohammadi-ivatloo, Behnam & Jamaluddin, Khairulnadzmi, 2021. "Malaysia scenario of biomass supply chain-cogeneration system and optimization modeling development: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    3. Nayak, Abhishek & Pulidindi, Indra Neel & Rao, Chinta Sankar, 2020. "Novel strategies for glucose production from biomass using heteropoly acid catalyst," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 215-220.
    4. Olivér Ősz & Balázs Dávid & Máté Hegyháti, 2023. "Comparison of discrete- and continuous-time models for scheduling waste wood processing facilities," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 31(3), pages 853-871, September.
    5. Kumar, Vijay Bhooshan & Pulidindi, Indra Neel & Gedanken, Aharon, 2015. "Selective conversion of starch to glucose using carbon based solid acid catalyst," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 141-145.
    6. Maria Lanfredi & Rosa Coluzzi & Vito Imbrenda & Bogdana Nosova & Massimiliano Giacalone & Rosario Turco & Marcela Prokopovà & Luca Salvati, 2023. "In-between Environmental Sustainability and Economic Viability: An Analysis of the State, Regulations, and Future of Italian Forestry Sector," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-21, May.
    7. Amjad Almusaed & Asaad Almssad & Asaad Alasadi & Ibrahim Yitmen & Sammera Al-Samaraee, 2023. "Assessing the Role and Efficiency of Thermal Insulation by the “BIO-GREEN PANEL” in Enhancing Sustainability in a Built Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-25, July.
    8. Stephan Kampelmann & Emmanuel Raufflet & Giulia Scialpi, 2020. "Earth, wood, and coffee: empirical evidence on value creation in the circular economy," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/308601, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    9. Richard Orozco & María Rosa Mosquera-Losada & Javier Rodriguez & Muluken Elias Adamseged & Philipp Grundmann, 2021. "Supportive Business Environments to Develop Grass Bioeconomy in Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-16, November.
    10. Zhao, Xiaoli & Cai, Qiong & Li, Shujie & Ma, Chunbo, 2018. "Public preferences for biomass electricity in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 242-253.
    11. Di Letizia, Gerardo & De Lucia, Caterina & Pazienza, Pasquale & Cappelletti, Giulio Mario, 2023. "Forest bioeconomy at regional scale: A systematic literature review and future policy perspectives," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    12. Davide Aloini & Riccardo Dulmin & Valeria Mininno & Alessandro Stefanini & Pierluigi Zerbino, 2020. "Driving the Transition to a Circular Economic Model: A Systematic Review on Drivers and Critical Success Factors in Circular Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-14, December.
    13. Khan, Feroz & Ali, Yousaf, 2022. "Moving towards a sustainable circular bio-economy in the agriculture sector of a developing country," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    14. Shafie, S.M., 2016. "A review on paddy residue based power generation: Energy, environment and economic perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 1089-1100.
    15. Román-Figueroa, Celián & Montenegro, Nicole & Paneque, Manuel, 2017. "Bioenergy potential from crop residue biomass in Araucania Region of Chile," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(PA), pages 170-177.
    16. Avcıoğlu, A.O. & Dayıoğlu, M.A. & Türker, U., 2019. "Assessment of the energy potential of agricultural biomass residues in Turkey," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 610-619.
    17. M. Mofijur & T.M.I. Mahlia & J. Logeswaran & M. Anwar & A.S. Silitonga & S.M. Ashrafur Rahman & A.H. Shamsuddin, 2019. "Potential of Rice Industry Biomass as a Renewable Energy Source," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-21, October.
    18. Luis Diaz‐Balteiro & Carlos Romero & Silvestre García de Jalón, 2022. "An analysis of the degree of circularity of the wood products industry in Europe," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(4), pages 1350-1363, August.
    19. Zhang, Jixiang & Li, Jun & Dong, Changqing & Zhang, Xiaolei & Rentizelas, Athanasios & Shen, Delong, 2021. "Comprehensive assessment of sustainable potential of agricultural residues for bioenergy based on geographical information system: A case study of China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 466-478.
    20. Yana, Syaifuddin & Nizar, Muhammad & Irhamni, & Mulyati, Dewi, 2022. "Biomass waste as a renewable energy in developing bio-based economies in Indonesia: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:20:p:7140-:d:1262537. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.