IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i13p5186-d1187621.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimum Scenarios of EV Charging Infrastructure: A Case Study for the Saudi Arabia Market

Author

Listed:
  • Mohamed Azab

    (EEET Department, Yanbu Industrial College, Yanbu al-Sinaiyah 46452, Saudi Arabia
    EEET Department, Faculty of Engineering, Benha University, Benha 13512, Egypt)

Abstract

The lack of an EV charging infrastructure is of the top five barriers preventing the adoption of EVs on a large scale. A long charging time is also one of the five barriers, according to the latest survey published by the IEA in 2021. The estimated increase in demand for EVs is a big challenge in many countries all around the world. This challenge exists in many EU and Middle East countries. The main reason for this problem is the requirement of huge funds to install enough public charging points that result in satisfactory charging services. Hence, the phase-out plans of internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles can be carried out successfully and smoothly. Unfortunately, there is a trade-off between the cost of installing charging points and EV charging time. Therefore, it is important to optimize both factors simultaneously. This way, the charging services can be provided at the minimum possible cost and at a satisfactory level of quality. This study determines the optimum ratio of the number of chargers to the number of EVs in a certain province. The optimal number of chargers that are necessary to optimally serve a certain number of EVs has been determined. Two well-known evolutionary search techniques have solved the optimization problem: particle swarm optimization (PSO) and genetic algorithms (GA). Both algorithms have succeeded in providing many optimal charging infrastructure scenarios. Hence, the decision maker can select the most convenient scenario from several alternatives based on the available budgets and the most convenient charging time.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohamed Azab, 2023. "Optimum Scenarios of EV Charging Infrastructure: A Case Study for the Saudi Arabia Market," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-22, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:13:p:5186-:d:1187621
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/13/5186/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/13/5186/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bruno Dalla Chiara & Francesco Deflorio & Michela Pellicelli & Luca Castello & Marco Eid, 2019. "Perspectives on Electrification for the Automotive Sector: A Critical Review of Average Daily Distances by Light-Duty Vehicles, Required Range, and Economic Outcomes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-35, October.
    2. Plötz, Patrick & Jakobsson, Niklas & Sprei, Frances, 2017. "On the distribution of individual daily driving distances," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 213-227.
    3. Jiahang He & Toshiyuki Yamamoto, 2020. "Characterization of Daily Travel Distance of a University Car Fleet for the Purpose of Replacing Conventional Vehicles with Electric Vehicles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-12, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jiahang He & Toshiyuki Yamamoto & Tomio Miwa & Takayuki Morikawa, 2020. "Hazard Duration Model with Panel Data for Daily Car Travel Distance: A Toyota City Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-13, August.
    2. Francesco Lo Franco & Mattia Ricco & Riccardo Mandrioli & Gabriele Grandi, 2020. "Electric Vehicle Aggregate Power Flow Prediction and Smart Charging System for Distributed Renewable Energy Self-Consumption Optimization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-25, September.
    3. Huber, Julian & Dann, David & Weinhardt, Christof, 2020. "Probabilistic forecasts of time and energy flexibility in battery electric vehicle charging," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    4. Ensslen, Axel & Ringler, Philipp & Dörr, Lasse & Jochem, Patrick & Zimmermann, Florian & Fichtner, Wolf, 2018. "Incentivizing smart charging: Modeling charging tariffs for electric vehicles in German and French electricity markets," MPRA Paper 91543, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 17 Feb 2018.
    5. Xuefang Li & Chenhui Liu & Jianmin Jia, 2019. "Ownership and Usage Analysis of Alternative Fuel Vehicles in the United States with the 2017 National Household Travel Survey Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-16, April.
    6. Francesco Simmini & Tommaso Caldognetto & Mattia Bruschetta & Enrico Mion & Ruggero Carli, 2021. "Model Predictive Control for Efficient Management of Energy Resources in Smart Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-19, September.
    7. Wang, Wanying & Zhang, Qiang & Peng, Zhanglin & Shao, Zhen & Li, Xuefang, 2020. "An empirical evaluation of different usage pattern between car-sharing battery electric vehicles and private ones," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 115-129.
    8. Wojciech Cieslik & Filip Szwajca & Wojciech Golimowski & Andrew Berger, 2021. "Experimental Analysis of Residential Photovoltaic (PV) and Electric Vehicle (EV) Systems in Terms of Annual Energy Utilization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-21, February.
    9. Han Su & Qian Zhang & Wanying Wang & Xiaoan Tang, 2021. "A Driving Behavior Distribution Fitting Method Based on Two-Stage Hybrid User Classification," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-24, June.
    10. Krystian Pietrzak & Oliwia Pietrzak, 2020. "Environmental Effects of Electromobility in a Sustainable Urban Public Transport," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-21, February.
    11. Jiahang He & Toshiyuki Yamamoto, 2020. "Characterization of Daily Travel Distance of a University Car Fleet for the Purpose of Replacing Conventional Vehicles with Electric Vehicles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-12, January.
    12. Zhaoqi Zang & Xiangdong Xu & Kai Qu & Ruiya Chen & Anthony Chen, 2022. "Travel time reliability in transportation networks: A review of methodological developments," Papers 2206.12696, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2022.
    13. Tomáš Settey & Jozef Gnap & Dominika Beňová & Michal Pavličko & Oľga Blažeková, 2021. "The Growth of E-Commerce Due to COVID-19 and the Need for Urban Logistics Centers Using Electric Vehicles: Bratislava Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-20, May.
    14. Haber, Marc & Azaïs, Philippe & Genies, Sylvie & Raccurt, Olivier, 2023. "Stress factor identification and Risk Probabilistic Number (RPN) analysis of Li-ion batteries based on worldwide electric vehicle usage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 343(C).
    15. Tal, Gil & Karanam, Vaishnavi Chaitanya & Favetti, Matthew P. & Sutton, Katrina May & Ogunmayin, Jade Motayo & Raghavan, Seshadri Srinivasa & Nitta, Christopher & Chakraborty, Debapriya & Davis, Adam , 2021. "Emerging Technology Zero Emission Vehicle Household Travel and Refueling Behavior," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt2v0853tp, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    16. Srinivasa Raghavan, Seshadri, 2020. "Behavioral Realism of Plug-In Electric Vehicle Usage: Implications for Emission Benefits, Energy Consumption, and Policies," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt1rz000pf, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    17. Willett Kempton & Nathaniel S. Pearre & Randall Guensler & Vetri V. Elango, 2023. "Influence of Battery Energy, Charging Power, and Charging Locations upon EVs’ Ability to Meet Trip Needs," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-23, February.
    18. Montserrat Guillen & Ana M. Pérez-Marín & Manuela Alcañiz, 2020. "Risk reference charts for speeding based on telematics information," IREA Working Papers 202003, University of Barcelona, Research Institute of Applied Economics, revised Apr 2020.
    19. Tu, Wei & Santi, Paolo & Zhao, Tianhong & He, Xiaoyi & Li, Qingquan & Dong, Lei & Wallington, Timothy J. & Ratti, Carlo, 2019. "Acceptability, energy consumption, and costs of electric vehicle for ride-hailing drivers in Beijing," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C), pages 147-160.
    20. Wojciech Cieslik & Filip Szwajca & Jedrzej Zawartowski & Katarzyna Pietrzak & Slawomir Rosolski & Kamil Szkarlat & Michal Rutkowski, 2021. "Capabilities of Nearly Zero Energy Building (nZEB) Electricity Generation to Charge Electric Vehicle (EV) Operating in Real Driving Conditions (RDC)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-22, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:13:p:5186-:d:1187621. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.