IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i10p4220-d1151739.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Review of Non-Residential Building Renovation and Improvement of Energy Efficiency: Office Buildings in Finland, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, and Germany

Author

Listed:
  • Mihkel Kiviste

    (School of Engineering, Tartu College, Tallinn University of Technology (TalTech), Puiestee 78, 51008 Tartu, Estonia)

  • Sami Musakka

    (AINS Group (A-Insinöörit), Renovation Engineering, Puutarhakatu 10, 33210 Tampere, Finland)

  • Aime Ruus

    (School of Engineering, Tartu College, Tallinn University of Technology (TalTech), Puiestee 78, 51008 Tartu, Estonia)

  • Juha Vinha

    (Building Physics, Civil Engineering, Faculty of Built Environment, Tampere University, Korkeakoulunkatu 5, P.O. Box 600, 33014 Tampere, Finland)

Abstract

Existing buildings are a source of great potential for energy efficiency through renovation. In this study, the national energy requirements equivalent for the major renovation of existing non-residential buildings using the example of office buildings in five European case countries are drawn out and discussed. The non-residential building sector has been found to be complex and heterogenous with much less available data than for the residential sector, but having greater average specific energy consumption per floor area. The existing non-residential building stock in the studied countries has been divided into varying amounts of groups and sub-groups. The energy requirements have been shifting from the increasing requirements for the U-values of the building envelope (before the 2000s) towards calculated energy demand for buildings as a whole (currently). The requirements for buildings in the near future will be carbon emission based. The energy efficiency of N-RBs in all of the studied case countries have been steadily improved during different decades of construction. Relatively older office stock combined with the relatively late introduction of national energy requirements was found to have a significantly larger potential for energy savings. Different terms and contents in national requirements were used to describe the principles of “major renovation” as from EPBD.

Suggested Citation

  • Mihkel Kiviste & Sami Musakka & Aime Ruus & Juha Vinha, 2023. "A Review of Non-Residential Building Renovation and Improvement of Energy Efficiency: Office Buildings in Finland, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, and Germany," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-26, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:10:p:4220-:d:1151739
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/10/4220/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/10/4220/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sartori, Igor & Wachenfeldt, Bjrn Jensen & Hestnes, Anne Grete, 2009. "Energy demand in the Norwegian building stock: Scenarios on potential reduction," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(5), pages 1614-1627, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Omar Shafqat & Elena Malakhtka & Nina Chrobot & Per Lundqvist, 2021. "End Use Energy Services Framework Co-Creation with Multiple Stakeholders—A Living Lab-Based Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-24, July.
    2. Hanan S.S. Ibrahim & Ahmed Z. Khan & Shady Attia & Yehya Serag, 2021. "Classification of Heritage Residential Building Stock and Defining Sustainable Retrofitting Scenarios in Khedivial Cairo," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-26, January.
    3. Nord, Natasa & Qvistgaard, Live Holmedal & Cao, Guangyu, 2016. "Identifying key design parameters of the integrated energy system for a residential Zero Emission Building in Norway," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(P3), pages 1076-1087.
    4. Coline Senior & Alenka Temeljotov Salaj & Milena Vukmirovic & Mina Jowkar & Živa Kristl, 2021. "The Spirit of Time—The Art of Self-Renovation to Improve Indoor Environment in Cultural Heritage Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-27, July.
    5. Ballarini, Ilaria & Corgnati, Stefano Paolo & Corrado, Vincenzo, 2014. "Use of reference buildings to assess the energy saving potentials of the residential building stock: The experience of TABULA project," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 273-284.
    6. Klöckner, Christian A. & Nayum, Alim, 2017. "Psychological and structural facilitators and barriers to energy upgrades of the privately owned building stock," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P1), pages 1005-1017.
    7. Di Turi, Silvia & Stefanizzi, Pietro, 2015. "Energy analysis and refurbishment proposals for public housing in the city of Bari, Italy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 58-71.
    8. Giraudet, Louis-Gaëtan & Guivarch, Céline & Quirion, Philippe, 2012. "Exploring the potential for energy conservation in French households through hybrid modeling," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 426-445.
    9. Olaya, Yris & Vásquez, Felipe & Müller, Daniel B., 2017. "Dwelling stock dynamics for addressing housing deficit," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 187-199.
    10. Yang, Xiu'e & Liu, Shuli & Zou, Yuliang & Ji, Wenjie & Zhang, Qunli & Ahmed, Abdullahi & Han, Xiaojing & Shen, Yongliang & Zhang, Shaoliang, 2022. "Energy-saving potential prediction models for large-scale building: A state-of-the-art review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    11. Yang, Yuchen & Javanroodi, Kavan & Nik, Vahid M., 2021. "Climate change and energy performance of European residential building stocks – A comprehensive impact assessment using climate big data from the coordinated regional climate downscaling experiment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
    12. Nilsson, Måns & Dzebo, Adis & Savvidou, Georgia & Axelsson, Katarina, 2020. "A bridging framework for studying transition pathways – From systems models to local action in the Swedish heating domain," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    13. Kesicki, Fabian & Anandarajah, Gabrial, 2011. "The role of energy-service demand reduction in global climate change mitigation: Combining energy modelling and decomposition analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(11), pages 7224-7233.
    14. Stéphane Poncin, 2018. "Energy policy tools in Luxembourg - Assessing their impact on households’ space heating energy consumption and CO2 emissions by means of the LuxHEI model," DEM Discussion Paper Series 18-23, Department of Economics at the University of Luxembourg.
    15. Bischof, Julian & Duffy, Aidan, 2022. "Life-cycle assessment of non-domestic building stocks: A meta-analysis of current modelling methods," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    16. Kulmer, Veronika & Seebauer, Sebastian & Hinterreither, Helene & Kortschak, Dominik & Theurl, Michaela C. & Haas, Willi, 2022. "Transforming the s-shape: Identifying and explaining turning points in market diffusion curves of low-carbon technologies in Austria," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(1).
    17. Paiho, Satu & Reda, Francesco, 2016. "Towards next generation district heating in Finland," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 915-924.
    18. Fonseca, Jimeno A. & Schlueter, Arno, 2015. "Integrated model for characterization of spatiotemporal building energy consumption patterns in neighborhoods and city districts," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 247-265.
    19. Savvidou, Georgia & Nykvist, Björn, 2020. "Heat demand in the Swedish residential building stock - pathways on demand reduction potential based on socio-technical analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    20. Streicher, Kai Nino & Berger, Matthias & Panos, Evangelos & Narula, Kapil & Soini, Martin Christoph & Patel, Martin K., 2021. "Optimal building retrofit pathways considering stock dynamics and climate change impacts," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:10:p:4220-:d:1151739. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.