IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2022i1p386-d1019040.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prediction and Mitigation of Wind Farm Blockage Losses Considering Mesoscale Atmospheric Response

Author

Listed:
  • Leila Legris

    (Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PJ, UK)

  • Morten Lindholt Pahus

    (Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PJ, UK)

  • Takafumi Nishino

    (Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PJ, UK)

  • Edgar Perez-Campos

    (Vestas Wind System A/S, Hedeager 42, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark)

Abstract

The engineering wind farm models currently used in industry can assess power losses due to turbine wake effects, but the prediction of power losses due to farm blockage is still a challenge. In this study we demonstrate a new prediction method of farm blockage losses and a possible strategy to mitigate them for a large offshore wind farm in the North Sea, by combining a common engineering wind farm model ’FLORIS’ with the ’two-scale momentum theory’ of Nishino and Dunstan (2020). Results show that the farm blockage losses depend significantly on the ’wind extractability’ factor, which reflects the strength of mesoscale atmospheric response. For a typical range of the extractability factor (assessed using a numerical weather prediction model) the farm blockage losses are shown to vary between about 5% and 15% of the annual energy production (AEP). However, these losses may be mitigated by adjusting turbine operating points taking into account the wind extractability. It is shown that a simple adjustment of the blade pitch angle and tip-speed ratio used below the rated wind speed may increase the AEP by up to about 2%.

Suggested Citation

  • Leila Legris & Morten Lindholt Pahus & Takafumi Nishino & Edgar Perez-Campos, 2022. "Prediction and Mitigation of Wind Farm Blockage Losses Considering Mesoscale Atmospheric Response," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-17, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2022:i:1:p:386-:d:1019040
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/1/386/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/1/386/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kelan Patel & Thomas D. Dunstan & Takafumi Nishino, 2021. "Time-Dependent Upper Limits to the Performance of Large Wind Farms Due to Mesoscale Atmospheric Response," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-16, October.
    2. Amin Niayifar & Fernando Porté-Agel, 2016. "Analytical Modeling of Wind Farms: A New Approach for Power Prediction," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-13, September.
    3. James Bleeg & Mark Purcell & Renzo Ruisi & Elizabeth Traiger, 2018. "Wind Farm Blockage and the Consequences of Neglecting Its Impact on Energy Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-20, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Amiri, Mojtaba Maali & Shadman, Milad & Estefen, Segen F., 2024. "A review of physical and numerical modeling techniques for horizontal-axis wind turbine wakes," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    2. Cao, Lichao & Ge, Mingwei & Gao, Xiaoxia & Du, Bowen & Li, Baoliang & Huang, Zhi & Liu, Yongqian, 2022. "Wind farm layout optimization to minimize the wake induced turbulence effect on wind turbines," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 323(C).
    3. Ziyu Zhang & Peng Huang & Haocheng Sun, 2020. "A Novel Analytical Wake Model with a Cosine-Shaped Velocity Deficit," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-20, June.
    4. Razi, P. & Ramaprabhu, P. & Tarey, P. & Muglia, M. & Vermillion, C., 2022. "A low-order wake interaction modeling framework for the performance of ocean current turbines under turbulent conditions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 1602-1617.
    5. Ti, Zilong & Deng, Xiao Wei & Yang, Hongxing, 2020. "Wake modeling of wind turbines using machine learning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    6. Souaiby, Marwa & Porté-Agel, Fernando, 2024. "An improved analytical framework for flow prediction inside and downstream of wind farms," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    7. Kelan Patel & Thomas D. Dunstan & Takafumi Nishino, 2021. "Time-Dependent Upper Limits to the Performance of Large Wind Farms Due to Mesoscale Atmospheric Response," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-16, October.
    8. Hayat, Imran & Chatterjee, Tanmoy & Liu, Huiwen & Peet, Yulia T. & Chamorro, Leonardo P., 2019. "Exploring wind farms with alternating two- and three-bladed wind turbines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 764-774.
    9. Janusz Kulejewski & Nabi Ibadov & Jerzy Rosłon & Jacek Zawistowski, 2021. "Cash Flow Optimization for Renewable Energy Construction Projects with a New Approach to Critical Chain Scheduling," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-15, September.
    10. Mingqiu Liu & Zhichang Liang & Haixiao Liu, 2022. "Numerical Investigations of Wake Expansion in the Offshore Wind Farm Using a Large Eddy Simulation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-19, March.
    11. Ti, Zilong & Deng, Xiao Wei & Zhang, Mingming, 2021. "Artificial Neural Networks based wake model for power prediction of wind farm," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 618-631.
    12. Dou, Bingzheng & Qu, Timing & Lei, Liping & Zeng, Pan, 2020. "Optimization of wind turbine yaw angles in a wind farm using a three-dimensional yawed wake model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    13. Li, Li & Wang, Bing & Ge, Mingwei & Huang, Zhi & Li, Xintao & Liu, Yongqian, 2023. "A novel superposition method for streamwise turbulence intensity of wind-turbine wakes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    14. Kim, Taewan & Song, Jeonghwan & You, Donghyun, 2024. "Optimization of a wind farm layout to mitigate the wind power intermittency," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 367(C).
    15. Steven Knoop & Pooja Ramakrishnan & Ine Wijnant, 2020. "Dutch Offshore Wind Atlas Validation against Cabauw Meteomast Wind Measurements," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-21, December.
    16. Hegazy, Amr & Blondel, Frédéric & Cathelain, Marie & Aubrun, Sandrine, 2022. "LiDAR and SCADA data processing for interacting wind turbine wakes with comparison to analytical wake models," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 457-471.
    17. Yang, Haoze & Ge, Mingwei & Abkar, Mahdi & Yang, Xiang I.A., 2022. "Large-eddy simulation study of wind turbine array above swell sea," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    18. Nicolas Kirchner-Bossi & Fernando Porté-Agel, 2018. "Realistic Wind Farm Layout Optimization through Genetic Algorithms Using a Gaussian Wake Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-26, November.
    19. Zhang, Jincheng & Zhao, Xiaowei, 2020. "Quantification of parameter uncertainty in wind farm wake modeling," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    20. Muhammad Nabeel Hussain & Nadeem Shaukat & Ammar Ahmad & Muhammad Abid & Abrar Hashmi & Zohreh Rajabi & Muhammad Atiq Ur Rehman Tariq, 2022. "Micro-Siting of Wind Turbines in an Optimal Wind Farm Area Using Teaching–Learning-Based Optimization Technique," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-24, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2022:i:1:p:386-:d:1019040. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.