IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i9p3373-d809179.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Study on the Distribution Law of Coal Seam Gas and Hydrogen Sulfide Affected by Abandoned Oil Wells

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaoqi Wang

    (College of Safety Science and Engineering, Liaoning Technical University, Huludao 125105, China
    Key Laboratory of Mine Thermo-Motive Disaster and Prevention, Ministry of Education, Huludao 125105, China)

  • Heng Ma

    (College of Safety Science and Engineering, Liaoning Technical University, Huludao 125105, China
    Key Laboratory of Mine Thermo-Motive Disaster and Prevention, Ministry of Education, Huludao 125105, China)

  • Xiaohan Qi

    (College of Safety Science and Engineering, Liaoning Technical University, Huludao 125105, China
    Key Laboratory of Mine Thermo-Motive Disaster and Prevention, Ministry of Education, Huludao 125105, China)

  • Ke Gao

    (College of Safety Science and Engineering, Liaoning Technical University, Huludao 125105, China
    Key Laboratory of Mine Thermo-Motive Disaster and Prevention, Ministry of Education, Huludao 125105, China)

  • Shengnan Li

    (College of Safety Science and Engineering, Liaoning Technical University, Huludao 125105, China
    Key Laboratory of Mine Thermo-Motive Disaster and Prevention, Ministry of Education, Huludao 125105, China)

Abstract

This paper is devoted to solving the problem of how to comprehensively control coal seam gas and hydrogen sulfide in the mining face, distributed from the coal seam in abandoned oil wells in coal mining resource areas. The abandoned oil wells of Ma tan 30 and Ma tan 31 in the No. I0104 1 05 working face of the Shuang Ma Coal Mine were taken as examples. Through parameter testing, gas composition analysis, field investigation at the source distribution, and the influence range of gas and hydrogen sulfide in coal seam in the affected range of the abandoned oil wells were studied. The results show that the coal-bearing strata in Shuang Ma coal field belong to the coal–oil coexistence strata, and the emission of H 2 S gas in the local area of the working face is mainly affected by closed and abandoned oil wells. Within the influence range of the abandoned oil wells, along the direction of the working face, the concentration of CH 4 and H 2 S gas in the borehole increases as you move closer to the coal center, and the two sides of the oil well show a decreasing trend. In the affected area of the abandoned oil well, the distribution of the desorption gas content in coal seam along the center distance of the oil well presents a decreasing trend in power function, particularly the closer the working face is to the center of the oil well. The higher the concentration of CH 4 and H 2 S, the lower the concentration when the working face moves further away from the oil well. The influence radius of CH 4 and H 2 S gas on the coal seam in the affected area of Ma tan 31 abandoned oil well is over 300 m. The results provide a theoretical basis for further understanding the law of gas and hydrogen sulfide enrichment in the mining face and the design of treatment measures within the influence range of abandoned oil wells.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaoqi Wang & Heng Ma & Xiaohan Qi & Ke Gao & Shengnan Li, 2022. "Study on the Distribution Law of Coal Seam Gas and Hydrogen Sulfide Affected by Abandoned Oil Wells," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-19, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:9:p:3373-:d:809179
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/9/3373/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/9/3373/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ng, ManWo, 2012. "Synergistic sensor location for link flow inference without path enumeration: A node-based approach," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 46(6), pages 781-788.
    2. Castillo, Enrique & Calviño, Aida & Lo, Hong K. & Menéndez, José María & Grande, Zacarías, 2014. "Non-planar hole-generated networks and link flow observability based on link counters," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 239-261.
    3. Rodriguez-Vega, Martin & Canudas-de-Wit, Carlos & Fourati, Hassen, 2019. "Location of turning ratio and flow sensors for flow reconstruction in large traffic networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 21-40.
    4. Chad Zanocco & Hilary Boudet & Roberta Nilson & Hannah Satein & Hannah Whitley & June Flora, 2018. "Place, proximity, and perceived harm: extreme weather events and views about climate change," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 149(3), pages 349-365, August.
    5. He, Sheng-xue, 2013. "A graphical approach to identify sensor locations for link flow inference," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 65-76.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Longjun Dong & Yanlin Zhao & Wenxue Chen, 2022. "Mining Safety and Sustainability—An Overview," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-6, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Salari, Mostafa & Kattan, Lina & Lam, William H.K. & Lo, H.P. & Esfeh, Mohammad Ansari, 2019. "Optimization of traffic sensor location for complete link flow observability in traffic network considering sensor failure," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 216-251.
    2. Rinaldi, Marco & Viti, Francesco, 2017. "Exact and approximate route set generation for resilient partial observability in sensor location problems," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 86-119.
    3. Rodriguez-Vega, Martin & Canudas-de-Wit, Carlos & Fourati, Hassen, 2021. "Average density estimation for urban traffic networks: Application to the Grenoble network," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 21-43.
    4. Fu, Chenyi & Zhu, Ning & Ling, Shuai & Ma, Shoufeng & Huang, Yongxi, 2016. "Heterogeneous sensor location model for path reconstruction," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 77-97.
    5. Lo, Hong K. & Chen, Anthony & Castillo, Enrique, 2016. "Robust network sensor location for complete link flow observability under uncertaintyAuthor-Name: Xu, Xiangdong," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 1-20.
    6. Viti, Francesco & Rinaldi, Marco & Corman, Francesco & Tampère, Chris M.J., 2014. "Assessing partial observability in network sensor location problems," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 65-89.
    7. Rinaldi, Marco, 2018. "Controllability of transportation networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 381-406.
    8. Yu, Xinyao & Ma, Shoufeng & Zhu, Ning & Lam, William H.K. & Fu, Hao, 2023. "Ensuring the robustness of link flow observation systems in sensor failure events," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    9. Yang, Yudi & Fan, Yueyue, 2015. "Data dependent input control for origin–destination demand estimation using observability analysis," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 385-403.
    10. Rodriguez-Vega, Martin & Canudas-de-Wit, Carlos & Fourati, Hassen, 2019. "Location of turning ratio and flow sensors for flow reconstruction in large traffic networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 21-40.
    11. Zhu, Ning & Fu, Chenyi & Zhang, Xuanyi & Ma, Shoufeng, 2022. "A network sensor location problem for link flow observability and estimation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 300(2), pages 428-448.
    12. Saif Eddin Jabari & Laura Wynter, 2016. "Sensor placement with time-to-detection guarantees," EURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 5(4), pages 415-433, December.
    13. Castillo, Enrique & Calviño, Aida & Lo, Hong K. & Menéndez, José María & Grande, Zacarías, 2014. "Non-planar hole-generated networks and link flow observability based on link counters," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 239-261.
    14. Hyoshin (John) Park & Ali Haghani & Song Gao & Michael A. Knodler & Siby Samuel, 2018. "Anticipatory Dynamic Traffic Sensor Location Problems with Connected Vehicle Technologies," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(6), pages 1299-1326, December.
    15. Siripirote, Treerapot & Sumalee, Agachai & Ho, H.W. & Lam, William H.K., 2015. "Statistical approach for activity-based model calibration based on plate scanning and traffic counts data," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 280-300.
    16. Fu, Chenyi & Zhu, Ning & Ma, Shoufeng, 2017. "A stochastic program approach for path reconstruction oriented sensor location model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 210-237.
    17. Guglielmo Zappalà, 2023. "Drought Exposure and Accuracy: Motivated Reasoning in Climate Change Beliefs," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 85(3), pages 649-672, August.
    18. Kim, Do-hun & Sjølie, Hanne K. & Aguilar, Francisco X., 2024. "Psychological distances to climate change and public preferences for biodiversity-augmenting attributes in family-owned production forests," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    19. Paul J. Croft, 2019. "Environmental Hazards: A Coverage Response Approach," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-15, March.
    20. Hui Chen & Zhaoming Chu & Chao Sun, 2021. "Sensor Deployment Strategy and Traffic Demand Estimation with Multisource Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-11, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:9:p:3373-:d:809179. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.