IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i8p2827-d792668.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Applicability Assessment of Viscoelastic Surfactants and Synthetic Polymers as a Base of Hydraulic Fracturing Fluids

Author

Listed:
  • Silin Mihail

    (Department of Technology of Chemical Substances for the Oil and Gas Industry of Gubkin University for Valuable Advice on Theoretical Material and Assistance in Experimental Research, Scientific Center of the International Level (Rational Development of the Planet Liquid Hydrocarbon Reserves), National University of Oil and Gas (Gubkin University), 119991 Moscow, Russia)

  • Magadova Lyubov

    (Department of Technology of Chemical Substances for the Oil and Gas Industry of Gubkin University for Valuable Advice on Theoretical Material and Assistance in Experimental Research, Scientific Center of the International Level (Rational Development of the Planet Liquid Hydrocarbon Reserves), National University of Oil and Gas (Gubkin University), 119991 Moscow, Russia)

  • Malkin Denis

    (Department of Technology of Chemical Substances for the Oil and Gas Industry of Gubkin University for Valuable Advice on Theoretical Material and Assistance in Experimental Research, Scientific Center of the International Level (Rational Development of the Planet Liquid Hydrocarbon Reserves), National University of Oil and Gas (Gubkin University), 119991 Moscow, Russia)

  • Krisanova Polina

    (Department of Technology of Chemical Substances for the Oil and Gas Industry of Gubkin University for Valuable Advice on Theoretical Material and Assistance in Experimental Research, Scientific Center of the International Level (Rational Development of the Planet Liquid Hydrocarbon Reserves), National University of Oil and Gas (Gubkin University), 119991 Moscow, Russia)

  • Borodin Sergei

    (Department of Technology of Chemical Substances for the Oil and Gas Industry of Gubkin University for Valuable Advice on Theoretical Material and Assistance in Experimental Research, Scientific Center of the International Level (Rational Development of the Planet Liquid Hydrocarbon Reserves), National University of Oil and Gas (Gubkin University), 119991 Moscow, Russia)

  • Filatov Andrey

    (Department of Technology of Chemical Substances for the Oil and Gas Industry of Gubkin University for Valuable Advice on Theoretical Material and Assistance in Experimental Research, Scientific Center of the International Level (Rational Development of the Planet Liquid Hydrocarbon Reserves), National University of Oil and Gas (Gubkin University), 119991 Moscow, Russia)

Abstract

Hydraulic fracturing (HF) is currently the most widespread and effective method of oil production stimulation. The most commonly used fracturing fluid is crosslinked guar gels. However, when using these systems, problems such as clogging of the pore space, cracking, and proppant packing with the remains of the undestroyed polymer arise. Therefore, the efficiency of the hydraulic fracturing process decreases. In this work, compositions based on viscoelastic surfactants (VES) and synthetic polymers (SP) were considered as alternatives capable of minimizing these disadvantages. Most often, the possibility of using a composition as a fracturing fluid is evaluated using rotational viscometry. However, rotational viscometry is not capable of fully assessing the structural and mechanical properties of fracturing fluid. This leads to a reduced spread of systems based on VES and SP. This paper proposes an integrated approach to assessing the effectiveness of a water-based fracturing fluid. The proposed comprehensive approach includes an assessment of the main characteristics of water-based fracturing fluids, including an analysis of their structural and mechanical properties, which is based on a combination of rotational and oscillatory rheology and a comparative analysis of methods for studying the influence of fluids on the reservoir rock. The use of the developed approach to assess the technological properties of fracturing fluids makes it possible to demonstrate the potential applicability of new, unconventional fracturing fluids such as systems based on VES and SP.

Suggested Citation

  • Silin Mihail & Magadova Lyubov & Malkin Denis & Krisanova Polina & Borodin Sergei & Filatov Andrey, 2022. "Applicability Assessment of Viscoelastic Surfactants and Synthetic Polymers as a Base of Hydraulic Fracturing Fluids," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-19, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:8:p:2827-:d:792668
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/8/2827/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/8/2827/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert W. Howarth & Anthony Ingraffea & Terry Engelder, 2011. "Should fracking stop?," Nature, Nature, vol. 477(7364), pages 271-275, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shang, Yuting & Li, Zongcheng & Zhu, Qi & Guo, Weiluo & Liu, Zhiyi & Zheng, Zhuo & Feng, Yujun & Yin, Hongyao, 2024. "A salt-induced smart and tough clean hydrofracturing fluid with superior high-temperature and high-salinity resistance," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 286(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lucija Muehlenbachs & Elisheba Spiller & Christopher Timmins, 2015. "The Housing Market Impacts of Shale Gas Development," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 105(12), pages 3633-3659, December.
    2. Wang, Jianliang & Feng, Lianyong & Steve, Mohr & Tang, Xu & Gail, Tverberg E. & Mikael, Höök, 2015. "China's unconventional oil: A review of its resources and outlook for long-term production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 31-42.
    3. Susan T. Zimny & Margaret C. Reardon, 2021. "Environmental justice expansion in the context of fracking," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 11(2), pages 234-246, June.
    4. Fry, Matthew, 2013. "Urban gas drilling and distance ordinances in the Texas Barnett Shale," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 79-89.
    5. Jeremy S. Brooks, 2013. "Avoiding the Limits to Growth: Gross National Happiness in Bhutan as a Model for Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(9), pages 1-25, August.
    6. Philippe Le Billon & Berit Kristoffersen, 2020. "Just cuts for fossil fuels? Supply-side carbon constraints and energy transition," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(6), pages 1072-1092, September.
    7. Wang, Jianliang & Mohr, Steve & Feng, Lianyong & Liu, Huihui & Tverberg, Gail E., 2016. "Analysis of resource potential for China’s unconventional gas and forecast for its long-term production growth," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 389-401.
    8. Ahamed, Sonya & Galford, Gillian L. & Panikkar, Bindu & Rizzo, Donna & Stephens, Jennie C., 2024. "Carbon collusion: Cooperation, competition, and climate obstruction in the global oil and gas extraction network," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    9. Antonakakis, Nikolaos & Chatziantoniou, Ioannis & Filis, George, 2015. "Energy Consumption, CO2 Emissions, and Economic Growth: A Moral Dilemma," MPRA Paper 67422, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Yizhou Dai & Huan Li & Chuanhao Wang & Weiqing Xue & Menglu Zhang & Donghao Zhao & Jing Xue & Jiawei Li & Laihao Luo & Chunxiao Liu & Xu Li & Peixin Cui & Qiu Jiang & Tingting Zheng & Songqi Gu & Yao , 2023. "Manipulating local coordination of copper single atom catalyst enables efficient CO2-to-CH4 conversion," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, December.
    11. Cosgrove, Brendan M. & LaFave, Daniel R. & Dissanayake, Sahan T. M. & Donihue, Michael R., 2015. "The Economic Impact of Shale Gas Development: A Natural Experiment along the New York / Pennsylvania Border," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 44(2), pages 20-39, August.
    12. Stephanie Malin, 2014. "There’s no real choice but to sign: neoliberalization and normalization of hydraulic fracturing on Pennsylvania farmland," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 4(1), pages 17-27, March.
    13. Jacobson, Mark Z. & Howarth, Robert W. & Delucchi, Mark A. & Scobie, Stan R. & Barth, Jannette M. & Dvorak, Michael J. & Klevze, Megan & Katkhuda, Hind & Miranda, Brian & Chowdhury, Navid A. & Jones, , 2013. "Examining the feasibility of converting New York State’s all-purpose energy infrastructure to one using wind, water, and sunlight," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 585-601.
    14. Milt, Austin W. & Armsworth, Paul R., 2017. "Performance of a cap and trade system for managing environmental impacts of shale gas surface infrastructure," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 399-406.
    15. Cesur, Resul & Tekin, Erdal & Ulker, Aydogan, 2018. "Can natural gas save lives? Evidence from the deployment of a fuel delivery system in a developing country," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 91-108.
    16. Liu, Jianye & Li, Zuxin & Luo, Dongkun & Duan, Xuqiang & Liu, Ruolei, 2020. "Shale gas production in China: A regional analysis of subsidies and suggestions for policy," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    17. Middleton, Richard S. & Gupta, Rajan & Hyman, Jeffrey D. & Viswanathan, Hari S., 2017. "The shale gas revolution: Barriers, sustainability, and emerging opportunities," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 88-95.
    18. Rigoberto Ariel Yépez-García & Luis San Vicente Portes & Luis Enrique García, 2013. "Planning for Higher Oil Prices : Power Sector Impact in Latin America and the Caribbean," World Bank Publications - Reports 17547, The World Bank Group.
    19. Robert Howarth & Renee Santoro & Anthony Ingraffea, 2012. "Venting and leaking of methane from shale gas development: response to Cathles et al," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 113(2), pages 537-549, July.
    20. Cotton, Matthew & Rattle, Imogen & Van Alstine, James, 2014. "Shale gas policy in the United Kingdom: An argumentative discourse analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 427-438.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:8:p:2827-:d:792668. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.