IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i4p1485-d751596.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Systematic Review of Lithium-Ion Battery Recycling Literature Using ProKnow-C and Methodi Ordinatio

Author

Listed:
  • Helton Rogger Regatieri

    (Interdisciplinary Postgraduate Program in Energy & Sustainability (PPGIES), Federal University of Latin American Integration-UNILA, Foz do Iguaçu 85860-600, Parana, Brazil)

  • Oswaldo Hideo Ando Junior

    (Interdisciplinary Postgraduate Program in Energy & Sustainability (PPGIES), Federal University of Latin American Integration-UNILA, Foz do Iguaçu 85860-600, Parana, Brazil
    Unidade Acadêmica do Cabo de Santo Agostinho (UACSA), Federal Rural University of Pernambuco (UFRPE), Recife 54518-430, Pernambuco, Brazil)

  • José Ricardo Cezar Salgado

    (Interdisciplinary Postgraduate Program in Energy & Sustainability (PPGIES), Federal University of Latin American Integration-UNILA, Foz do Iguaçu 85860-600, Parana, Brazil)

Abstract

Recycling lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) plays an important role in environmental preservation since it prevents heavy metals from polluting the soil and underground water through the recovering of valuable metals. The interest in LIB recycling has grown in recent years due to the environmental and economic gains which can be seen by increasing number of articles and publications. This review uses two methodologies: ProKnow-C and Methodi Ordinatio to create a bibliographic portfolio (BP) that defines the state-of-the-start literature in LIB recycling. This review is vital because it proposes a database of a finite number of publications of relevant authors and articles to service new research on the LIB recycling theme. The research started off with 2515 articles related to the search query which were later filtered and treated to be systematically analyzed. After filtering, 591 articles were left in the filtered raw article database (FRA-database). The efficiency and parameters of ProKnow-C and Methodi Ordinatio were counter-compared forming two databases. These databases were analyzed systematically and it was found that in the initial stages there were no differences between them. Nevertheless, in the final phases, a difference in the ranking was established when compiling the final BP of the 23 best ranked articles and authors. By using ProKnow-C and Methodi Ordinatio , this review sets out to establish a concise BP of paramount importance to the LIB recycling theme.

Suggested Citation

  • Helton Rogger Regatieri & Oswaldo Hideo Ando Junior & José Ricardo Cezar Salgado, 2022. "Systematic Review of Lithium-Ion Battery Recycling Literature Using ProKnow-C and Methodi Ordinatio," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-23, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:4:p:1485-:d:751596
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/4/1485/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/4/1485/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Guo, Xueyi & Zhang, Jingxi & Tian, Qinghua, 2021. "Modeling the potential impact of future lithium recycling on lithium demand in China: A dynamic SFA approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    2. Ordoñez, J. & Gago, E.J. & Girard, A., 2016. "Processes and technologies for the recycling and recovery of spent lithium-ion batteries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 195-205.
    3. Arumugam Manthiram, 2020. "A reflection on lithium-ion battery cathode chemistry," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-9, December.
    4. Richa, Kirti & Babbitt, Callie W. & Gaustad, Gabrielle & Wang, Xue, 2014. "A future perspective on lithium-ion battery waste flows from electric vehicles," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 63-76.
    5. de Carvalho, Gustavo Dambiski Gomes & Sokulski, Carla Cristiane & da Silva, Wesley Vieira & de Carvalho, Hélio Gomes & de Moura, Rafael Vignoli & de Francisco, Antonio Carlos & da Veiga, Claudimar Per, 2020. "Bibliometrics and systematic reviews: A comparison between the Proknow-C and the Methodi Ordinatio," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 14(3).
    6. Elaine Aparecida Regiani Campos & Regina Negri Pagani & Luis Mauricio Resende & Joseane Pontes, 2018. "Construction and qualitative assessment of a bibliographic portfolio using the methodology Methodi Ordinatio," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 116(2), pages 815-842, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bruna Maria Gerônimo & Giane Gonçalves Lenzi, 2023. "Maturity Models for Testing and Calibration Laboratories: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-22, February.
    2. Paulo Gabriel Martins Leandro & Fabiano Salvadori & José Enrique Eirez Izquierdo & Marco Roberto Cavallari & Oswaldo Hideo Ando Junior, 2024. "The Advancements and Challenges in Organic Photovoltaic Cells: A Focused and Spotlight Review Using the Proknow-C," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-18, August.
    3. Norah Nadia Sánchez Torres & Jorge Gomes Lima & Joylan Nunes Maciel & Mario Gazziro & Abel Cavalcante Lima Filho & Cicero Rocha Souto & Fabiano Salvadori & Oswaldo Hideo Ando Junior, 2024. "Non-Invasive Techniques for Monitoring and Fault Detection in Internal Combustion Engines: A Systematic Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-20, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hao, Han & Qiao, Qinyu & Liu, Zongwei & Zhao, Fuquan, 2017. "Impact of recycling on energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions from electric vehicle production: The China 2025 case," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 114-125.
    2. Khalid Ahmed Al-Ansari & Ahmet Faruk Aysan, 2021. "More than ten years of Blockchain creation: How did we use the technology and which direction is the research heading? [Plus de dix ans de création Blockchain : Comment avons-nous utilisé la techno," Working Papers hal-03343048, HAL.
    3. Carolinne Secco & Maria Eduarda Kounaris Fuziki & Angelo Marcelo Tusset & Giane Gonçalves Lenzi, 2023. "Reactive Processes for H 2 S Removal," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-14, February.
    4. Ye, Bin & Yang, Peng & Jiang, Jingjing & Miao, Lixin & Shen, Bo & Li, Ji, 2017. "Feasibility and economic analysis of a renewable energy powered special town in China," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 40-50.
    5. Li, Zehong & Wang, Chunying & Chen, Jian, 2024. "Supply and demand of lithium in China based on dynamic material flow analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    6. Shahjalal, Mohammad & Roy, Probir Kumar & Shams, Tamanna & Fly, Ashley & Chowdhury, Jahedul Islam & Ahmed, Md. Rishad & Liu, Kailong, 2022. "A review on second-life of Li-ion batteries: prospects, challenges, and issues," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    7. Wang, Mengmeng & Liu, Kang & Dutta, Shanta & Alessi, Daniel S. & Rinklebe, Jörg & Ok, Yong Sik & Tsang, Daniel C.W., 2022. "Recycling of lithium iron phosphate batteries: Status, technologies, challenges, and prospects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    8. Maria A. Franco & Stefan N. Groesser, 2021. "A Systematic Literature Review of the Solar Photovoltaic Value Chain for a Circular Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-35, August.
    9. Tang, Yanyan & Zhang, Qi & Li, Yaoming & Li, Hailong & Pan, Xunzhang & Mclellan, Benjamin, 2019. "The social-economic-environmental impacts of recycling retired EV batteries under reward-penalty mechanism," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 1-1.
    10. Barbara Kasulaitis & Callie W. Babbitt & Anna Christina Tyler, 2021. "The role of consumer preferences in reducing material intensity of electronic products," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(2), pages 435-447, April.
    11. Pedram Asef & Marzia Milan & Andrew Lapthorn & Sanjeevikumar Padmanaban, 2021. "Future Trends and Aging Analysis of Battery Energy Storage Systems for Electric Vehicles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-28, December.
    12. Badreah Ali Al Jahdaly & Mohamed Farouk Elsadek & Badreldin Mohamed Ahmed & Mohamed Fawzy Farahat & Mohamed M. Taher & Ahmed M. Khalil, 2021. "Outstanding Graphene Quantum Dots from Carbon Source for Biomedical and Corrosion Inhibition Applications: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-33, February.
    13. Lin, Shunda & Liu, Renlong & Guo, Shenghui, 2022. "High temperature microwave dielectric and thermochemical properties of waste LixMn2O4 battery cathode materials reduced by moso bamboo," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 714-724.
    14. Golmohammadzadeh, Rabeeh & Faraji, Fariborz & Jong, Brian & Pozo-Gonzalo, Cristina & Banerjee, Parama Chakraborty, 2022. "Current challenges and future opportunities toward recycling of spent lithium-ion batteries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    15. Nguyen-Tien, Viet & Dai, Qiang & Harper, Gavin D.J. & Anderson, Paul A. & Elliott, Robert J.R., 2022. "Optimising the geospatial configuration of a future lithium ion battery recycling industry in the transition to electric vehicles and a circular economy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 321(C).
    16. Murillo Vetroni Barros & Mariane Bigarelli Ferreira & Guilherme Francisco Prado & Cassiano Moro Piekarski & Claudia Tania Picinin, 2020. "The interaction between knowledge management and technology transfer: a current literature review between 2013 and 2018," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 45(5), pages 1585-1606, October.
    17. Mi Tian & Yanchunxiao Qi & Eun-Suok Oh, 2021. "Application of a Polyacrylate Latex to a Lithium Iron Phosphate Cathode as a Binder Material," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-10, March.
    18. Xiaowei Duan & Wenkun Zhu & Zhongkui Ruan & Min Xie & Juan Chen & Xiaohan Ren, 2022. "Recycling of Lithium Batteries—A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-23, February.
    19. Berzi, Lorenzo & Delogu, Massimo & Pierini, Marco & Romoli, Filippo, 2016. "Evaluation of the end-of-life performance of a hybrid scooter with the application of recyclability and recoverability assessment methods," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 140-155.
    20. Wang, Wei & Wu, Yufeng, 2017. "An overview of recycling and treatment of spent LiFePO4 batteries in China," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 233-243.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:4:p:1485-:d:751596. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.