IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i2p633-d726438.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Linear and Non-Linear Regression Analysis for the Adsorption Kinetics of SO 2 in a Fixed Carbon Bed Reactor—A Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Anna M. Kisiela-Czajka

    (Faculty of Mechanical and Power Engineering, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, 50-370 Wroclaw, Poland)

  • Bartosz Dziejarski

    (Faculty of Environmental Engineering, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, 50-370 Wroclaw, Poland)

Abstract

Here, we determined the kinetic parameters of SO 2 adsorption on unburned carbons from lignite fly ash and activated carbons based on hard coal dust. The model studies were performed using the linear and non-linear regression method for the following models: pseudo first and second order, intraparticle diffusion, and chemisorption on a heterogeneous surface. The quality of the fitting of a given model to empirical data was assessed based on: R 2 , R, Δq, SSE, ARE, χ 2 , HYBRID, MPSD, EABS, and SNE. It was clearly shown that the linear regression more accurately reflects the behaviour of the adsorption system, which is consistent with the first-order kinetic reaction—for activated carbons (SO 2 + Ar) or chemisorption on a heterogeneous surface—for unburned carbons (SO 2 + Ar and SO 2 + Ar + H 2 O (g) + O 2 ) and activated carbons (SO 2 + Ar + H 2 O (g) + O 2 ). Importantly, usually, each of the approaches (linear/non-linear) indicated a different mechanism of the studied phenomenon. A certain universality of the χ 2 and HYBRID functions has been proved, the minimization of which repeatedly led to the lowest SNE values for the indicated models. Fitting data by any of the non-linear equations based on the R or R 2 functions only cannot be treated as evidence/prerequisite of the existence of a given adsorption mechanism.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna M. Kisiela-Czajka & Bartosz Dziejarski, 2022. "Linear and Non-Linear Regression Analysis for the Adsorption Kinetics of SO 2 in a Fixed Carbon Bed Reactor—A Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-22, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:2:p:633-:d:726438
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/2/633/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/2/633/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Musyoka, Nicholas M. & Wdowin, Magdalena & Rambau, Khavharendwe M. & Franus, Wojciech & Panek, Rafał & Madej, Jarosław & Czarna-Juszkiewicz, Dorota, 2020. "Synthesis of activated carbon from high-carbon coal fly ash and its hydrogen storage application," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 1264-1271.
    2. Kisiela, Anna M. & Czajka, Krzysztof M. & Moroń, Wojciech & Rybak, Wiesław & Andryjowicz, Czesław, 2016. "Unburned carbon from lignite fly ash as an adsorbent for SO2 removal," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(P3), pages 1454-1463.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alves, Luís & Pereira, Vítor & Lagarteira, Tiago & Mendes, Adélio, 2021. "Catalytic methane decomposition to boost the energy transition: Scientific and technological advancements," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    2. Fuquan Song & Lintao Huang & Heying Ding & Shiming Zhang & Jinbiao Yu, 2023. "In Situ Ni-Doped Hierarchically Porous Carbon Nanofibers Derived from Polyacrylonitrile/Pitch for Hydrogen Storage at Ambient Temperature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-13, May.
    3. Krzysztof M. Czajka, 2021. "Gasification of Coal by CO 2 : The Impact of the Heat Transfer Limitation on the Progress, Reaction Rate and Kinetics of the Process," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-22, September.
    4. Kisiela-Czajka, Anna M., 2022. "Adsorption behaviour of SO2 molecules on unburned carbon from lignite fly ash in the context of developing commercially applicable environmental carbon adsorbent," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    5. Aaron Fuller & Jörg Maier & Emmanouil Karampinis & Jana Kalivodova & Panagiotis Grammelis & Emmanuel Kakaras & Günter Scheffknecht, 2018. "Fly Ash Formation and Characteristics from (co-)Combustion of an Herbaceous Biomass and a Greek Lignite (Low-Rank Coal) in a Pulverized Fuel Pilot-Scale Test Facility," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-38, June.
    6. Czajka, Krzysztof & Krochmalny, Krystian & Kisiela-Czajka, Anna & Ostrycharczyk, Michał & Czerep, Michał & Tkaczuk-Serafin, Monika & Baranowski, Marcin & Łukasz, Niedźwiecki & Halina, Pawlak-Kruczek &, 2024. "Investigating the potential of a waste-derived additive for enhancing coal combustion efficiency and environmental sustainability in a circular economy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 295(C).
    7. Özlem Uğuz & Hanzade Haykiri-Açma & Serdar Yaman, 2020. "Combustion kinetics of lignite preheated under oxygen-enriched conditions," Energy & Environment, , vol. 31(5), pages 813-824, August.
    8. Zacharczuk, Wojciech & Andruszkiewicz, Artur & Tatarek, Andrzej & Alahmer, Ali & Alsaqoor, Sameh, 2021. "Effect of Ca-based additives on the capture of SO2 during combustion of pulverized lignite," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    9. Gu, Hui & Cui, Yanfeng & Zhu, Hongxia & Xue, Rui & Si, Fengqi, 2018. "A new approach for clustering in desulfurization system based on modified framework for gypsum slurry quality monitoring," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 789-801.
    10. Kathleen Dupre & Emily M. Ryan & Azat Suleimenov & Jillian L. Goldfarb, 2018. "Experimental and Computational Demonstration of a Low-Temperature Waste to By-Product Conversion of U.S. Oil Shale Semi-Coke to a Flue Gas Sorbent," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-15, November.
    11. Darmansyah, Darmansyah & You, Sheng-Jie & Wang, Ya-Fen, 2023. "Advancements of coal fly ash and its prospective implications for sustainable materials in Southeast Asian countries: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:2:p:633-:d:726438. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.