IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i2p468-d721421.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of Stand-Alone Photovoltaic—Marine Current Hybrid System and the Influence on Daily and Seasonal Energy Storage

Author

Listed:
  • Jorge Olmedo-González

    (Electrochemistry Laboratory, Instituto Politécnico Nacional-ESIQIE, UPALM, Av. Instituto Politécnico Nacional S/N, Mexico City 07738, Mexico)

  • Guadalupe Ramos-Sánchez

    (Chemistry Department, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Iztapalapa, Av. San Rafael Atlixco 186, Mexico City 09340, Mexico)

  • Erika Paola Garduño-Ruiz

    (Instituto de Ingeniería, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria, Building 17, Circuito Exterior S/N, Coyoacán, Mexico City 04510, Mexico)

  • Rosa de Guadalupe González-Huerta

    (Electrochemistry Laboratory, Instituto Politécnico Nacional-ESIQIE, UPALM, Av. Instituto Politécnico Nacional S/N, Mexico City 07738, Mexico)

Abstract

Stand-alone systems in remote regions require the utilization of renewable resources; however, their natural intermittence requires the implementation of energy-storage systems that allow a continuous power supply. More than one renewable source is usually available at the same site. Thus, the choice of a hybrid system seems viable. It is relevant to study hybrid systems as they could reduce energy storage; however, sizing the hybrid system might have several implications, not only for the available daily energy, but also for the required daily energy storage and surplus seasonal energy. In this work, we present a case study of a stand-alone, conventional household powered by photovoltaic and marine-current-energy systems in Cozumel, Mexico. The analysis of different hybridization degrees serves as a guidance tool to decide whether hybrid systems are required for a specific situation; in contrast to previous approaches, where ideal consumption and generation profiles have been utilized, yearlong profiles were utilized here. The renewable potential data were obtained on site at an hourly resolution; requirements such as size of and cycles in the daily and seasonal energy storage were analyzed according to the degree of participation or hybridization of the proposed renewable systems through an algorithm that evaluates power generation and daily consumption throughout the year. A further analysis indicated that marine-current-energy implementation reduces the size of the daily energy-storage system by 79% in comparison to the use of only a photovoltaic system due to the similarity between the energy-demand profile and the marine-current-energy production profile. The results indicate that a greater participation of marine currents can help decrease daily storage while increasing seasonal storage by 16% compared to using only solar energy. On the other hand, hybridization enabled a reduction in the number of daily charge and discharge cycles at 0.2 hybridization degrees. It also allowed us to reduce the seasonal energy storage by 38% at 0.6 hybridization degrees with respect to only using energy from marine currents. Afterwards, energy-storage technologies were evaluated using the TOPSIS Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis to validate the best-suited technology for the energy-storage system. The evaluation considered the characteristics of the technology and the periods of energy storage. In this work, hybrid storage systems were mandatory since, for daily storage, lithium-ion batteries are better suited, while for seasonal storage, hydrogen-producing systems are more suitable to manage the amount of energy and the storage duration due to the high seasonal renewable-energy variations.

Suggested Citation

  • Jorge Olmedo-González & Guadalupe Ramos-Sánchez & Erika Paola Garduño-Ruiz & Rosa de Guadalupe González-Huerta, 2022. "Analysis of Stand-Alone Photovoltaic—Marine Current Hybrid System and the Influence on Daily and Seasonal Energy Storage," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-21, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:2:p:468-:d:721421
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/2/468/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/2/468/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rourke, Fergal O. & Boyle, Fergal & Reynolds, Anthony, 2010. "Marine current energy devices: Current status and possible future applications in Ireland," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(3), pages 1026-1036, April.
    2. Karin Sinclair & Andrea E. Copping & Roel May & Finlay Bennet & Marijke Warnas & Muriel Perron & Åsa Elmqvist & Elise DeGeorge, 2018. "Resolving environmental effects of wind energy," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 7(4), July.
    3. Uihlein, Andreas & Magagna, Davide, 2016. "Wave and tidal current energy – A review of the current state of research beyond technology," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 1070-1081.
    4. Guney, Mukrimin Sevket & Tepe, Yalcin, 2017. "Classification and assessment of energy storage systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 1187-1197.
    5. Luo, Xing & Wang, Jihong & Dooner, Mark & Clarke, Jonathan, 2015. "Overview of current development in electrical energy storage technologies and the application potential in power system operation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 511-536.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Hao & Wang, Huanran & Li, Ruixiong & Sun, Hao & Ge, Gangqiang & Ling, Lanning, 2022. "Experimental and analytical investigation of near-isothermal pumped hydro-compressed air energy storage system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    2. Alexandru Ciocan & Cosmin Ungureanu & Alin Chitu & Elena Carcadea & George Darie, 2020. "Electrical Longboard for Everyday Urban Commuting," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-14, September.
    3. Bizon, Nicu, 2019. "Efficient fuel economy strategies for the Fuel Cell Hybrid Power Systems under variable renewable/load power profile," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 1-1.
    4. Fox, Clive J. & Benjamins, Steven & Masden, Elizabeth A. & Miller, Raeanne, 2018. "Challenges and opportunities in monitoring the impacts of tidal-stream energy devices on marine vertebrates," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 1926-1938.
    5. Moioli, Emanuele & Mutschler, Robin & Züttel, Andreas, 2019. "Renewable energy storage via CO2 and H2 conversion to methane and methanol: Assessment for small scale applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 497-506.
    6. Diego Rodríguez Rodríguez, 2019. "Los costes de la transición: las centrales de bombeo y el gas en sistemas aislados," Studies on the Spanish Economy eee2019-13, FEDEA.
    7. Papadopoulos, V. & Knockaert, J. & Develder, C. & Desmet, J., 2019. "Investigating the need for real time measurements in industrial wind power systems combined with battery storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 247(C), pages 559-571.
    8. Candra Saigustia & Sylwester Robak, 2021. "Review of Potential Energy Storage in Abandoned Mines in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-16, October.
    9. Zhang, Ziyu & Ding, Tao & Zhou, Quan & Sun, Yuge & Qu, Ming & Zeng, Ziyu & Ju, Yuntao & Li, Li & Wang, Kang & Chi, Fangde, 2021. "A review of technologies and applications on versatile energy storage systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    10. Martin, Nigel & Rice, John, 2021. "Power outages, climate events and renewable energy: Reviewing energy storage policy and regulatory options for Australia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    11. Apostolou, Dimitrios & Enevoldsen, Peter, 2019. "The past, present and potential of hydrogen as a multifunctional storage application for wind power," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 917-929.
    12. Park, Jinwoo & You, Fengqi & Cho, Hyungtae & Lee, Inkyu & Moon, Il, 2020. "Novel massive thermal energy storage system for liquefied natural gas cold energy recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    13. Hu, Huakun & Xue, Wendong & Jiang, Peng & Li, Yong, 2022. "Bibliometric analysis for ocean renewable energy: An comprehensive review for hotspots, frontiers, and emerging trends," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    14. Culcasi, Andrea & Gurreri, Luigi & Zaffora, Andrea & Cosenza, Alessandro & Tamburini, Alessandro & Micale, Giorgio, 2020. "On the modelling of an Acid/Base Flow Battery: An innovative electrical energy storage device based on pH and salinity gradients," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    15. Dehghani-Sanij, A.R. & Tharumalingam, E. & Dusseault, M.B. & Fraser, R., 2019. "Study of energy storage systems and environmental challenges of batteries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 192-208.
    16. Dewevre, Florent & Lacroix, Clément & Loubar, Khaled & Poncet, Sébastien, 2024. "Carbon dioxide energy storage systems: Current researches and perspectives," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    17. Daniel Akinyele & Juri Belikov & Yoash Levron, 2017. "Battery Storage Technologies for Electrical Applications: Impact in Stand-Alone Photovoltaic Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-39, November.
    18. Bai, Bo & Xiong, Siqin & Song, Bo & Xiaoming, Ma, 2019. "Economic analysis of distributed solar photovoltaics with reused electric vehicle batteries as energy storage systems in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 213-229.
    19. Ioannis Mexis & Grazia Todeschini, 2020. "Battery Energy Storage Systems in the United Kingdom: A Review of Current State-of-the-Art and Future Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-31, July.
    20. Mousavi, Navid & Kothapalli, Ganesh & Habibi, Daryoush & Khiadani, Mehdi & Das, Choton K., 2019. "An improved mathematical model for a pumped hydro storage system considering electrical, mechanical, and hydraulic losses," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 247(C), pages 228-236.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:2:p:468-:d:721421. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.