IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i22p8579-d974508.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

High-Efficiency Power Cycles for Particle-Based Concentrating Solar Power Plants: Thermodynamic Optimization and Critical Comparison

Author

Listed:
  • Miguel Angel Reyes-Belmonte

    (Department of Chemical, Energy and Mechanical Technology, Rey Juan Carlos University, Calle Tulipán, 28933 Móstoles, Madrid, Spain)

  • Francesco Rovense

    (Laboratorio Energia e Ambiente Piacenza, LEAP s.c.a.r.l., Via Nino Bixio, 27/C, 29121 Piacenza, Italy)

Abstract

This paper investigates and compares several highly efficient thermodynamic cycles that are suitable for coupling with particle-in-tube fluidized-bed solar receiver technology. In such a receiver, high-temperature particles are used as both a heat transfer fluid and a storage medium. A dense particle suspension (DPS) is created through an upward bubbling fluidized-bed (UBFB) flow inside the receiver tubes, which constitutes the “particle-in-tube” solar receiver concept. Reaching higher temperatures is seen as a key factor for future cost reductions in the solar plant, as this leads to both higher power conversion efficiency and increased energy storage density. Three advanced thermodynamic cycles are analyzed in this work: the supercritical steam Rankine cycle (s-steam), supercritical carbon dioxide cycle (s-CO 2 ) and integrated solar combined cycle (ISCC). For each one, 100% solar contribution, which is considered the total thermal input to the power cycle, can be satisfied by the solar particle receiver. The main findings show that the s-CO 2 cycle is the most suitable thermodynamic cycle for the DPS solar plant, exhibiting a net cycle efficiency above 50% for a moderate temperature range (680–730 °C). For the other advanced power cycles, 45.35% net efficiency can be achieved for the s-steam case, while the efficiency of the ISCC configuration is limited to 45.23% for the solar-only operation mode.

Suggested Citation

  • Miguel Angel Reyes-Belmonte & Francesco Rovense, 2022. "High-Efficiency Power Cycles for Particle-Based Concentrating Solar Power Plants: Thermodynamic Optimization and Critical Comparison," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-18, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:22:p:8579-:d:974508
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/22/8579/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/22/8579/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Reyes-Belmonte, M.A. & Sebastián, A. & Romero, M. & González-Aguilar, J., 2016. "Optimization of a recompression supercritical carbon dioxide cycle for an innovative central receiver solar power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 17-27.
    2. Chen, Rui & Romero, Manuel & González-Aguilar, José & Rovense, Francesco & Rao, Zhenghua & Liao, Shengming, 2022. "Optical and thermal integration analysis of supercritical CO2 Brayton cycles with a particle-based solar thermal plant based on annual performance," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 164-179.
    3. Reyes-Belmonte, M.A. & Sebastián, A. & Spelling, J. & Romero, M. & González-Aguilar, J., 2019. "Annual performance of subcritical Rankine cycle coupled to an innovative particle receiver solar power plant," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 786-795.
    4. Luu, Minh Tri & Milani, Dia & McNaughton, Robbie & Abbas, Ali, 2017. "Analysis for flexible operation of supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle integrated with solar thermal systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 752-771.
    5. Gomez-Garcia, Fabrisio & Gauthier, Daniel & Flamant, Gilles, 2017. "Design and performance of a multistage fluidised bed heat exchanger for particle-receiver solar power plants with storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 510-523.
    6. Benoit, H. & Spreafico, L. & Gauthier, D. & Flamant, G., 2016. "Review of heat transfer fluids in tube-receivers used in concentrating solar thermal systems: Properties and heat transfer coefficients," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 298-315.
    7. Rovense, F. & Reyes-Belmonte, M.A. & González-Aguilar, J. & Amelio, M. & Bova, S. & Romero, M., 2019. "Flexible electricity dispatch for CSP plant using un-fired closed air Brayton cycle with particles based thermal energy storage system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 971-984.
    8. Crespi, Francesco & Gavagnin, Giacomo & Sánchez, David & Martínez, Gonzalo S., 2017. "Supercritical carbon dioxide cycles for power generation: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 152-183.
    9. Liu, Yaping & Wang, Ying & Huang, Diangui, 2019. "Supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle: A state-of-the-art review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    10. Martín, Helena & de la Hoz, Jordi & Velasco, Guillermo & Castilla, Miguel & García de Vicuña, José Luís, 2015. "Promotion of concentrating solar thermal power (CSP) in Spain: Performance analysis of the period 1998–2013," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 1052-1068.
    11. Rovense, Francesco & Reyes-Belmonte, Miguel Ángel & Romero, Manuel & González-Aguilar, José, 2022. "Thermo-economic analysis of a particle-based multi-tower solar power plant using unfired combined cycle for evening peak power generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yang, Jingze & Yang, Zhen & Duan, Yuanyuan, 2022. "A review on integrated design and off-design operation of solar power tower system with S–CO2 Brayton cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    2. Marta Muñoz & Antonio Rovira & María José Montes, 2022. "Thermodynamic cycles for solar thermal power plants: A review," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(2), March.
    3. Duniam, Sam & Veeraragavan, Ananthanarayanan, 2019. "Off-design performance of the supercritical carbon dioxide recompression Brayton cycle with NDDCT cooling for concentrating solar power," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    4. Arias, I. & Cardemil, J. & Zarza, E. & Valenzuela, L. & Escobar, R., 2022. "Latest developments, assessments and research trends for next generation of concentrated solar power plants using liquid heat transfer fluids," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    5. Xu, Zhen & Liu, Xinxin & Xie, Yingchun, 2023. "Off-design performances of a dry-cooled supercritical recompression Brayton cycle using CO2–H2S as working fluid," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    6. Muhammed Saeed & Khaled Alawadi & Sung Chul Kim, 2020. "Performance of Supercritical CO 2 Power Cycle and Its Turbomachinery with the Printed Circuit Heat Exchanger with Straight and Zigzag Channels," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-25, December.
    7. Sleiti, Ahmad K. & Al-Ammari, Wahib & Ahmed, Samer & Kapat, Jayanta, 2021. "Direct-fired oxy-combustion supercritical-CO2 power cycle with novel preheating configurations -thermodynamic and exergoeconomic analyses," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    8. Reyes-Belmonte, M.A. & Sebastián, A. & Spelling, J. & Romero, M. & González-Aguilar, J., 2019. "Annual performance of subcritical Rankine cycle coupled to an innovative particle receiver solar power plant," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 786-795.
    9. Saeed, Muhammad & Kim, Man-Hoe, 2022. "A newly proposed supercritical carbon dioxide Brayton cycle configuration to enhance energy sources integration capability," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PA).
    10. Luo, Qiao & Zhou, Yuan & Huang, Yanping & Huang, Jiajian & Hu, Wei & Yuan, Yuan & Tang, Longchang, 2023. "Multi-region oscillation characteristics and hazard of supercritical carbon dioxide in parallel channels natural circulation system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    11. Palacz, Michal & Haida, Michal & Smolka, Jacek & Plis, Marcin & Nowak, Andrzej J. & Banasiak, Krzysztof, 2018. "A gas ejector for CO2 supercritical cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 1207-1216.
    12. Kunniyoor, Vijayaraj & Singh, Punit & Nadella, Karthik, 2020. "Value of closed-cycle gas turbines with design assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    13. Ma, Yuegeng & Morozyuk, Tatiana & Liu, Ming & Yan, Junjie & Liu, Jiping, 2019. "Optimal integration of recompression supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle with main compression intercooling in solar power tower system based on exergoeconomic approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 1134-1154.
    14. Rovense, Francesco & Reyes-Belmonte, Miguel Ángel & Romero, Manuel & González-Aguilar, José, 2022. "Thermo-economic analysis of a particle-based multi-tower solar power plant using unfired combined cycle for evening peak power generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    15. Merchán, R.P. & Santos, M.J. & Medina, A. & Calvo Hernández, A., 2022. "High temperature central tower plants for concentrated solar power: 2021 overview," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    16. Aofang Yu & Wen Su & Li Zhao & Xinxing Lin & Naijun Zhou, 2020. "New Knowledge on the Performance of Supercritical Brayton Cycle with CO 2 -Based Mixtures," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-23, April.
    17. Alva, Guruprasad & Lin, Yaxue & Fang, Guiyin, 2018. "An overview of thermal energy storage systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 341-378.
    18. Yang, Jingze & Yang, Zhen & Duan, Yuanyuan, 2020. "Off-design performance of a supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle integrated with a solar power tower system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    19. Sleiti, Ahmad K. & Al-Ammari, Wahib A., 2021. "Off-design performance analysis of combined CSP power and direct oxy-combustion supercritical carbon dioxide cycles," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 14-29.
    20. Rovense, F. & Reyes-Belmonte, M.A. & González-Aguilar, J. & Amelio, M. & Bova, S. & Romero, M., 2019. "Flexible electricity dispatch for CSP plant using un-fired closed air Brayton cycle with particles based thermal energy storage system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 971-984.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:22:p:8579-:d:974508. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.