IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i21p8145-d959892.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Numerical Simulation of Roughness Effects of Ice Accretion on Wind Turbine Airfoils

Author

Listed:
  • Khaled Yassin

    (ForWind-Centre for Wind Energy Research, Institute of Physics, University of Oldenburg, 26129 Oldenburg, Germany
    Current address: Institute of Energy and Climate Research (IEK-14), Forschungszentrum Juelich GmbH, 52425 Juelich, Germany.)

  • Hassan Kassem

    (Fraunhofer Institute for Wind Energy Systems, Küpkersweg 70, 26129 Oldenburg, Germany)

  • Bernhard Stoevesandt

    (Fraunhofer Institute for Wind Energy Systems, Küpkersweg 70, 26129 Oldenburg, Germany)

  • Thomas Klemme

    (Senvion GmbH, Überseering 10, 22297 Hamburg, Germany
    Current address: Nordex Energy SE & Co., KG, Service Product Management, Langenhorner Chaussee 600, 22419 Hamburg, Germany.)

  • Joachim Peinke

    (ForWind-Centre for Wind Energy Research, Institute of Physics, University of Oldenburg, 26129 Oldenburg, Germany)

Abstract

One of the emerging problems in modern computational fluid dynamics is the simulation of flow over rough surfaces. A good example of these rough surfaces is wind turbine blades with ice formation on its leading edge. Instead of resolving the airflow field using a fine computational grid near the wall, rough wall functions (RWFs) can be used to model the flow behavior in case of the presence of roughness. This work aims to investigate the performance of state-of-the-art RWFs to show which of these models can provide the most accurate results with the lowest computational cost possible. This aim is achieved by comparing coefficients of lift and pressure resulting from CFD simulations with wind tunnel results of an airfoil with actual ice profiles collected from the site. The RWFs are used to simulate airflow field over the airfoil profiles with ice profile attached to its leading edge using OpenFOAM CFD framework. The comparison of the numerical simulations and the wind tunnel measurements showed that the Colebrook RWF provided the best agreement between simulation and experimental results while using about 20% of the number of cells used with smooth RWF.

Suggested Citation

  • Khaled Yassin & Hassan Kassem & Bernhard Stoevesandt & Thomas Klemme & Joachim Peinke, 2022. "Numerical Simulation of Roughness Effects of Ice Accretion on Wind Turbine Airfoils," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-20, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:21:p:8145-:d:959892
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/21/8145/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/21/8145/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sailor, David J. & Smith, Michael & Hart, Melissa, 2008. "Climate change implications for wind power resources in the Northwest United States," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 33(11), pages 2393-2406.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lucy Cradden & Gareth Harrison & John Chick, 2012. "Will climate change impact on wind power development in the UK?," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 115(3), pages 837-852, December.
    2. Gonçalves-Ageitos, María & Barrera-Escoda, Antoni & Baldasano, Jose M. & Cunillera, Jordi, 2015. "Modelling wind resources in climate change scenarios in complex terrains," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 670-678.
    3. Wimhurst, Joshua J. & Greene, J. Scott, 2019. "Oklahoma's future wind energy resources and their relationship with the Central Plains low-level jet," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    4. Wang, Bing & Ke, Ruo-Yu & Yuan, Xiao-Chen & Wei, Yi-Ming, 2014. "China׳s regional assessment of renewable energy vulnerability to climate change," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 185-195.
    5. Lean, Hooi Hooi & Smyth, Russell, 2013. "Are fluctuations in US production of renewable energy permanent or transitory?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 483-488.
    6. Charles Fant & Adam Schlosser, 2013. "The Impact of Climate Change on Wind and Solar Resources in Southern Africa," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2013-071, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    7. Markus Gross & Vanesa Magar, 2016. "Offshore Wind Energy Climate Projection Using UPSCALE Climate Data under the RCP8.5 Emission Scenario," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(10), pages 1-12, October.
    8. Jentsch, Mark F. & James, Patrick A.B. & Bourikas, Leonidas & Bahaj, AbuBakr S., 2013. "Transforming existing weather data for worldwide locations to enable energy and building performance simulation under future climates," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 514-524.
    9. Sinha, Avik & Tiwari, Sunil & Saha, Tanaya, 2024. "Modeling the behavior of renewable energy market: Understanding the moderation of climate risk factors," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    10. Alonzo, Bastien & Ringkjob, Hans-Kristian & Jourdier, Benedicte & Drobinski, Philippe & Plougonven, Riwal & Tankov, Peter, 2017. "Modelling the variability of the wind energy resource on monthly and seasonal timescales," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1434-1446.
    11. Katopodis, Theodoros & Markantonis, Iason & Vlachogiannis, Diamando & Politi, Nadia & Sfetsos, Athanasios, 2021. "Assessing climate change impacts on wind characteristics in Greece through high resolution regional climate modelling," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 427-444.
    12. Liang, Chao & Umar, Muhammad & Ma, Feng & Huynh, Toan L.D., 2022. "Climate policy uncertainty and world renewable energy index volatility forecasting," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    13. Fant, Charles & Gunturu, Udaya Bhaskar, 2013. "Characterizing Wind Power Resource Reliability in Southern Africa," WIDER Working Paper Series 067, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    14. Pes, Marcelo P. & Pereira, Enio B. & Marengo, Jose A. & Martins, Fernando R. & Heinemann, Detlev & Schmidt, Michael, 2017. "Climate trends on the extreme winds in Brazil," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 110-120.
    15. González, Albano & Pérez, Juan C. & Díaz, Juan P. & Expósito, Francisco J., 2017. "Future projections of wind resource in a mountainous archipelago, Canary Islands," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 120-128.
    16. Pereira de Lucena, André Frossard & Szklo, Alexandre Salem & Schaeffer, Roberto & Dutra, Ricardo Marques, 2010. "The vulnerability of wind power to climate change in Brazil," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 904-912.
    17. Charles Fant & Udaya Bhaskar Gunturu, 2013. "Characterizing Wind Power Resource Reliability in Southern Africa," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2013-067, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    18. Pryor, S.C. & Barthelmie, R.J., 2010. "Climate change impacts on wind energy: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(1), pages 430-437, January.
    19. Wang, Bing & Liang, Xiao-Jie & Zhang, Hao & Wang, Lu & Wei, Yi-Ming, 2014. "Vulnerability of hydropower generation to climate change in China: Results based on Grey forecasting model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 701-707.
    20. Jing-Li Fan & Bao-Jun Tang & Hao Yu & Yun-Bing Hou & Yi-Ming Wei, 2015. "Impact of climatic factors on monthly electricity consumption of China’s sectors," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 75(2), pages 2027-2037, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:21:p:8145-:d:959892. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.