IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i20p7602-d942702.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Laboratory Research on Hydraulic Losses on SHP Inlet Channel Trash Racks

Author

Listed:
  • Natalia Walczak

    (Department of Hydraulic and Sanitary Engineering, Poznan University of Life Sciences, 60-637 Poznan, Poland)

  • Zbigniew Walczak

    (Department of Construction and Geoengineering, Poznan University of Life Sciences, 60-637 Poznan, Poland)

  • Tomasz Tymiński

    (Institute of Environmental Engineering, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Plac Grunwaldzki 24, 50-363 Wrocław, Poland)

Abstract

There is currently a growing trend towards renewable energy sources, which are characterised by a guaranteed power supply and low failure rate. Hydropower plants (small or large) are an example of such a source. They supply a total of 16% of the world’s electricity. The advantages of a small hydropower plant include the relatively simple construction process and the lack of need for upstream water storage. SHPs are one of the most cost-effective and environmentally friendly energy technologies, which is why they are steadily increasing in popularity. One of the important components of SHPs are the trash racks in the inlet channels. Their main purpose is to catch debris and other elements carried downstream and to prevent these pollutants from reaching the turbine units. They can also protect migrating ichthyofauna such as larger fish. If trash racks are installed in the inlet channel, hydraulic losses are to be expected due to the reduction in the flow cross-section through the racks (bars) themselves and through the accumulation of debris and various types of trash on these racks. Energy losses on the trash racks affect the financial aspect of SHP investments. This paper presents the results of laboratory tests on trash racks for SHPs by taking into account the different shapes of the bars used, their number and spacing, and the angles of the trash racks to estimate the hydraulic losses on the trash racks. The measured values of hydraulic losses Δ h on the trash racks varied according to the type of trash racks, the density of the bars in the cross-section, and the angle of the trash racks from the horizontal, reaching the highest values on the trash racks with angle bars (AB). They were almost eight times greater than those recorded on cylindrical-bar (CB) trash racks, although they involved different angles. It was shown that the discrepancy in the magnitude of losses on trash racks can be large, even for the same type of trash racks. It depends significantly on the design (shape and bar spacing) of the trash racks and the way the trash racks are installed. Depending on the inclination angle, the increase in energy losses reached 70% for angle bars, 60% for flat-bar trash racks, and almost 40% for cylindrical bars. The values of energy loss as well as the loss coefficient β varied non-linearly for the different bar types depending on the angle of inclination of the gratings, and the degree of this non-linearity depended on the type of bars and the blockage ratio of the section. The presented research results can be useful both during the design and the operation of an SHP.

Suggested Citation

  • Natalia Walczak & Zbigniew Walczak & Tomasz Tymiński, 2022. "Laboratory Research on Hydraulic Losses on SHP Inlet Channel Trash Racks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-18, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:20:p:7602-:d:942702
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/20/7602/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/20/7602/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Bing & Nistor, Ioan & Murty, Tad & Wei, Yi-Ming, 2014. "Efficiency assessment of hydroelectric power plants in Canada: A multi criteria decision making approach," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 112-121.
    2. Jiang, Zhiqiang & Li, Rongbo & Li, Anqiang & Ji, Changming, 2018. "Runoff forecast uncertainty considered load adjustment model of cascade hydropower stations and its application," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 693-708.
    3. Wencheng Guo & Daoyi Zhu, 2018. "A Review of the Transient Process and Control for a Hydropower Station with a Super Long Headrace Tunnel," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-27, November.
    4. Natalia Walczak & Zbigniew Walczak & Jakub Nieć, 2021. "Influence of Debris on Water Intake Gratings in Small Hydroelectric Plants: An Experimental Study on Hydraulic Parameters," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-13, June.
    5. Alp, Ahmet & Akyüz, Adil & Kucukali, Serhat, 2020. "Ecological impact scorecard of small hydropower plants in operation: An integrated approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 1605-1617.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Zi & Guo, Wencheng, 2023. "Stability and dynamic response of two-stage hydropower stations cascaded by regulating reservoir," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 651-666.
    2. Hu, Jinhong & Yang, Jiebin & He, Xianghui & Zhao, Zhigao & Yang, Jiandong, 2023. "Transient analysis of a hydropower plant with a super-long headrace tunnel during load acceptance: Instability mechanism and measurement verification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PA).
    3. Ewa Chomać-Pierzecka & Andrzej Kokiel & Joanna Rogozińska-Mitrut & Anna Sobczak & Dariusz Soboń & Jacek Stasiak, 2022. "Hydropower in the Energy Market in Poland and the Baltic States in the Light of the Challenges of Sustainable Development-An Overview of the Current State and Development Potential," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-19, October.
    4. Michael O. Ukoba & Ogheneruona E. Diemuodeke & Mohammed Alghassab & Henry I. Njoku & Muhammad Imran & Zafar A. Khan, 2020. "Composite Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for Optimization of Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems for Geopolitical Zones in Nigeria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-27, July.
    5. Guo, Wencheng & Peng, Zhiyuan, 2019. "Hydropower system operation stability considering the coupling effect of water potential energy in surge tank and power grid," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 846-861.
    6. Chang, Jianxia & Li, Yunyun & Yuan, Meng & Wang, Yimin, 2017. "Efficiency evaluation of hydropower station operation: A case study of Longyangxia station in the Yellow River, China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 23-31.
    7. Lei, Kaixuan & Chang, Jianxia & Long, Ruihao & Wang, Yimin & Zhang, Hongxue, 2022. "Cascade hydropower station risk operation under the condition of inflow uncertainty," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(PA).
    8. Jin, Xiaoyu & Liu, Benxi & Liao, Shengli & Cheng, Chuntian & Zhang, Yi & Zhao, Zhipeng & Lu, Jia, 2022. "Wasserstein metric-based two-stage distributionally robust optimization model for optimal daily peak shaving dispatch of cascade hydroplants under renewable energy uncertainties," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    9. Guillaume Bon & Ludovic Chatellier & Yves Le Guer & Cécile Bellot & Xavier Casiot & Laurent David, 2024. "Pressure Loss Modeling for Multi-Stage Obstacles in Pressurized Ducts," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-19, July.
    10. Liu, Jia & Zeng, Peter Pingliang & Xing, Hao & Li, Yalou & Wu, Qiuwei, 2020. "Hierarchical duality-based planning of transmission networks coordinating active distribution network operation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    11. Lan Feng & Pan Hu & Haisen Wang & Ming-ming Chen & Jiangang Han, 2022. "Improving City Water Quality through Pollution Reduction with Urban Floodgate Infrastructure and Design Solutions: A Case Study in Wuxi, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-18, September.
    12. He, Feifei & Zhou, Jianzhong & Mo, Li & Feng, Kuaile & Liu, Guangbiao & He, Zhongzheng, 2020. "Day-ahead short-term load probability density forecasting method with a decomposition-based quantile regression forest," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    13. Barros, Carlos Pestana & Wanke, Peter, 2015. "An analysis of African airlines efficiency with two-stage TOPSIS and neural networks," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 44, pages 90-102.
    14. Yongqi Liu & Lei Ye & Hui Qin & Shuo Ouyang & Zhendong Zhang & Jianzhong Zhou, 2019. "Middle and Long-Term Runoff Probabilistic Forecasting Based on Gaussian Mixture Regression," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 33(5), pages 1785-1799, March.
    15. Liu, Yi & Zhang, Jian & Liu, Zhe & Chen, Long & Yu, Xiaodong, 2022. "Surge wave characteristics for hydropower plant with upstream double surge tanks connected in series under small load disturbance," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 186(C), pages 667-676.
    16. Yang, Lichao & Cai, Zuansi & Li, Cai & He, Qingcheng & Ma, Yan & Guo, Chaobin, 2020. "Numerical investigation of cycle performance in compressed air energy storage in aquifers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    17. Wencheng Guo & Yang Liu & Fangle Qu & Xinyu Xu, 2020. "A Review of Critical Stable Sectional Areas for the Surge Tanks of Hydropower Stations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-25, December.
    18. Jin-Wei Wang & Hua Liao & Bao-Jun Tang & Ruo-Yu Ke & Yi-Ming Wei, 2017. "Is the CO2 Emissions Reduction from Scale Change, Structural Change or Technology Change? Evidence from Non-metallic Sector of 11 Major Economies in 1995-2009," CEEP-BIT Working Papers 101, Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research (CEEP), Beijing Institute of Technology.
    19. Yueqiu Wu & Liping Wang & Yi Wang & Yanke Zhang & Jiajie Wu & Qiumei Ma & Xiaoqing Liang & Bin He, 2021. "Risk Analysis for Short-Term Operation of the Power Generation in Cascade Reservoirs Considering Multivariate Reservoir Inflow Forecast Errors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-16, March.
    20. Bing Wang & Hua-Nan Li & Xiao-Chen Yuan & Zhen-Ming Sun, 2017. "Energy Poverty in China: A Dynamic Analysis Based on a Hybrid Panel Data Decision Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-14, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:20:p:7602-:d:942702. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.