IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i1p351-d717663.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantifying Environmental and Economic Impacts of Highly Porous Activated Carbon from Lignocellulosic Biomass for High-Performance Supercapacitors

Author

Listed:
  • Yuxi Wang

    (Division of Forestry and Natural Resources, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA)

  • Jingxin Wang

    (Division of Forestry and Natural Resources, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA
    Center for Sustainable Biomaterials and Bioenergy, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA)

  • Xufeng Zhang

    (Division of Forestry and Natural Resources, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA)

  • Debangsu Bhattacharyya

    (Department of Chemical and Biomedical Engineering, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA)

  • Edward M. Sabolsky

    (Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA)

Abstract

Activated carbons (AC) from lignocellulosic biomass feedstocks are used in a broad range of applications, especially for electrochemical devices such as supercapacitor electrodes. Limited studies of environmental and economic impacts for AC supercapacitor production have been conducted. Thus, this paper evaluated the environmental and economic impacts of AC produced from lignocellulosic biomass for energy-storage purposes. The life cycle assessment (LCA) was employed to quantify the potential environmental impacts associated with AC production via the proposed processes including feedstock establishment, harvest, transport, storage, and in-plant production. A techno-economic model was constructed to analyze the economic feasibility of AC production, which included the processes in the proposed technology, as well as the required facility installation and management. A base case, together with two alternative scenarios of KOH-reuse and steam processes for carbon activation, were evaluated for both environmental and economic impacts, while the uncertainty of the net present value (NPV) of the AC production was examined with seven economic indicators. Our results indicated that overall “in-plant production” process presented the highest environmental impacts. Normalized results of the life-cycle impact assessment showed that the AC production had environmental impacts mainly on the carcinogenics, ecotoxicity, and non-carcinogenics categories. We then further focused on life cycle analysis from raw biomass delivery to plant gate, the results showed that “feedstock establishment” had the most significant environmental impact, ranging from 50.3% to 85.2%. For an activated carbon plant producing 3000 kg AC per day in the base case, the capital cost would be USD 6.66 million, and annual operation cost was found to be USD 15.46 million. The required selling price (RSP) of AC was USD 16.79 per kg, with the discounted payback period (DPB) of 9.98 years. Alternative cases of KOH-reuse and steam processes had GHG emissions of 15.4 kg CO 2 eq and 10.2 kg CO 2 eq for every 1 kg of activated carbon, respectively. Monte Carlo simulation showed 49.96% of the probability for an investment to be profitable in activated carbon production from lignocellulosic biomass for supercapacitor electrodes.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuxi Wang & Jingxin Wang & Xufeng Zhang & Debangsu Bhattacharyya & Edward M. Sabolsky, 2022. "Quantifying Environmental and Economic Impacts of Highly Porous Activated Carbon from Lignocellulosic Biomass for High-Performance Supercapacitors," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-19, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:351-:d:717663
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/1/351/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/1/351/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alhashimi, Hashim A. & Aktas, Can B., 2017. "Life cycle environmental and economic performance of biochar compared with activated carbon: A meta-analysis," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 13-26.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Castro-Gutiérrez, J. & Canevesi, R.L.S. & Emo, M. & Izquierdo, M.T. & Celzard, A. & Fierro, V., 2022. "CO2 outperforms KOH as an activator for high-rate supercapacitors in aqueous electrolyte," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qin, Fanzhi & Zhang, Chen & Zeng, Guangming & Huang, Danlian & Tan, Xiaofei & Duan, Abing, 2022. "Lignocellulosic biomass carbonization for biochar production and characterization of biochar reactivity," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    2. Ren, Xueyong & Shanb Ghazani, Mohammad & Zhu, Hui & Ao, Wenya & Zhang, Han & Moreside, Emma & Zhu, Jinjiao & Yang, Pu & Zhong, Na & Bi, Xiaotao, 2022. "Challenges and opportunities in microwave-assisted catalytic pyrolysis of biomass: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 315(C).
    3. Ayub, Yousaf & Zhou, Jianzhao & Shen, Weifeng & Ren, Jingzheng, 2023. "Innovative valorization of biomass waste through integration of pyrolysis and gasification: Process design, optimization, and multi-scenario sustainability analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    4. Luo, Juan & Ma, Rui & Lin, Junhao & Sun, Shichang & Gong, Guojin & Sun, Jiaman & Chen, Yi & Ma, Ning, 2023. "Review of microwave pyrolysis of sludge to produce high quality biogas: Multi-perspectives process optimization and critical issues proposal," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    5. Hugo Alexander Rondón-Quintana & Fredy Alberto Reyes-Lizcano & Saieth Baudilio Chaves-Pabón & Juan Gabriel Bastidas-Martínez & Carlos Alfonso Zafra-Mejía, 2022. "Use of Biochar in Asphalts: Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-12, April.
    6. Korus, Agnieszka & Jagiello, Jacek & Jaroszek, Hanna & Copik, Paulina & Szlęk, Andrzej, 2024. "Variation of pore development scenarios by changing gasification atmosphere and temperature," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).
    7. Chang, Boon Peng & Rodriguez-Uribe, Arturo & Mohanty, Amar K. & Misra, Manjusri, 2021. "A comprehensive review of renewable and sustainable biosourced carbon through pyrolysis in biocomposites uses: Current development and future opportunity," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    8. Wu, Benteng & Lin, Richen & Bose, Archishman & Huerta, Jorge Diaz & Kang, Xihui & Deng, Chen & Murphy, Jerry D., 2023. "Economic and environmental viability of biofuel production from organic wastes: A pathway towards competitive carbon neutrality," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    9. Teddy Ireen Kantoro Mathabatha & Anthony Njuguna Matheri & Mohamed Belaid, 2023. "Peanut Shell-Derived Biochar as a Low-Cost Adsorbent to Extract Cadmium, Chromium, Lead, Copper, and Zinc (Heavy Metals) from Wastewater: Circular Economy Approach," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 3(2), pages 1045-1064, June.
    10. María Alejandra Décima & Simone Marzeddu & Margherita Barchiesi & Camilla Di Marcantonio & Agostina Chiavola & Maria Rosaria Boni, 2021. "A Review on the Removal of Carbamazepine from Aqueous Solution by Using Activated Carbon and Biochar," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-50, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:351-:d:717663. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.