IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i18p6752-d916079.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Vulnerability Analysis of Harbor Oil Pipeline Affected by Typhoon

Author

Listed:
  • Jihong Ye

    (National & Local Joint Engineering Research Center of Harbor Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation Technology/Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Petrochemical Environmental Pollution Control, Zhejiang Ocean University, No.1, Haida South Road, Zhoushan 316022, China)

  • Yiyang Fang

    (National & Local Joint Engineering Research Center of Harbor Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation Technology/Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Petrochemical Environmental Pollution Control, Zhejiang Ocean University, No.1, Haida South Road, Zhoushan 316022, China)

  • Xinxiang Yang

    (National & Local Joint Engineering Research Center of Harbor Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation Technology/Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Petrochemical Environmental Pollution Control, Zhejiang Ocean University, No.1, Haida South Road, Zhoushan 316022, China)

Abstract

The integrity of oil pipelines has received considerable attention. Pipeline leakage accidents cause environmental pollution and casualties. Analysis of accident data in recent years shows that the harbor oil pipeline is prone to natural disasters such as typhoons. The vulnerability analysis of the pipeline was conducted from three perspectives: typhoon grades, windward angles, and operating conditions. The analytic hierarchy is used to build the vulnerability evaluation index system. The vulnerability evaluation score of the pipeline can be calculated by the semi-quantitative method. The results show that the probability of pipeline vulnerability failure increases with the increase of typhoon level, while the change of wind angle has no obvious effect on the pipeline. The full load of the pipeline has a higher evaluation score than that of the empty load, which means the full load is safer. The vulnerability analysis of oil pipelines can effectively improve the safety of pipeline transportation under the influence of typhoons.

Suggested Citation

  • Jihong Ye & Yiyang Fang & Xinxiang Yang, 2022. "Vulnerability Analysis of Harbor Oil Pipeline Affected by Typhoon," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-17, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:18:p:6752-:d:916079
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/18/6752/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/18/6752/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Siler-Evans, Kyle & Hanson, Alex & Sunday, Cecily & Leonard, Nathan & Tumminello, Michele, 2014. "Analysis of pipeline accidents in the United States from 1968 to 2009," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 7(4), pages 257-269.
    2. Kraidi, Layth & Shah, Raj & Matipa, Wilfred & Borthwick, Fiona, 2019. "Analyzing the critical risk factors associated with oil and gas pipeline projects in Iraq," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 14-22.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shengli, Liu & Yongtu, Liang, 2019. "Exploring the temporal structure of time series data for hazardous liquid pipeline incidents based on complex network theory," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 26(C).
    2. Wang, WuChang & Zhang, Yi & Li, YuXing & Hu, Qihui & Liu, Chengsong & Liu, Cuiwei, 2022. "Vulnerability analysis method based on risk assessment for gas transmission capabilities of natural gas pipeline networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 218(PB).
    3. Liu, Shengli & Liang, Yongtu, 2021. "Statistics of catastrophic hazardous liquid pipeline accidents," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    4. Chao Zhang & Wan Wang & Fengjiao Xu & Yong Chen & Tingxin Qin, 2022. "A Risk Treatment Strategy Model for Oil Pipeline Accidents Based on a Bayesian Decision Network Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-16, October.
    5. Shen, Y. & Zhou, W., 2024. "A comparison of onshore oil and gas transmission pipeline incident statistics in Canada and the United States," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 45(C).
    6. Richard A. Schultz & Douglas W. Hubbard & David J. Evans & Sam L. Savage, 2020. "Characterization of Historical Methane Occurrence Frequencies from U.S. Underground Natural Gas Storage Facilities with Implications for Risk Management, Operations, and Regulatory Policy," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(3), pages 588-607, March.
    7. Berke Ogulcan Parlak & Huseyin Ayhan Yavasoglu, 2023. "A Comprehensive Analysis of In-Line Inspection Tools and Technologies for Steel Oil and Gas Pipelines," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-25, February.
    8. Zhiqiang Xie & Fengshan Jiang & Jiarui Xu & Zhengang Zhai & Jianglong He & Daoyang Zheng & Junyu Lian & Zhiqun Hou & Lei Zhao & Yanxia Wang & Yuyun Feng, 2023. "A Narrative of Urban Underground Pipeline System Disasters in China in 2021: Spatial and Temporal Distribution, Causal Analysis, and Response Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-23, June.
    9. Ahsan Waqar & Idris Othman & Roberto Alonso González-Lezcano, 2023. "Challenges to the Implementation of BIM for the Risk Management of Oil and Gas Construction Projects: Structural Equation Modeling Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-28, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:18:p:6752-:d:916079. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.