IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v192y2024ics0301421524002349.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The burden of natural gas leaks on public sector emergency response in the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Brodsky, Casey N.
  • Bucala, Matthew D.
  • Rowland, Sebastian T.
  • Michanowicz, Drew R.

Abstract

Fire departments play a critical role in responding to potential hazards generated by natural gas and propane leaks, yet the costs of providing these services is unknown. Here, we analyzed 15 years of gas leak-coded incidents from the National Fire Incident Reporting System (NFIRS) and estimated associated costs using fire department operating budgets. From 2003 to 2018, a total of 2.4 million gas leak-coded incidents required fire department responses, accounting for ∼0.8% of all nationwide incidents. Reported gas leak incidents have steadily increased nationwide, nearly quadrupling from 2003 to 2018. In 2018, New York City (NYC) experienced 22,090 gas leak incidents—more than the next 25 cities combined—conservatively costing NYC $70 million annually. With a median national response cost of $2609 (S.D. $1734), uncombusted gas leaks conservatively cost U.S. fire departments $564 million in 2018—at least 10x greater than for gas leak-caused fires. City-level natural gas systems entail an underappreciated and increasing public cost burden on emergency response services. Findings herein raise the salience of gas leak-associated emergency response costs and support improved gas leak response coordination between emergency services and gas utility providers. Decision-makers are encouraged to incorporate these costs into cost-benefit analyses and consider the intended and unintended effects on emergency response systems in managing energy transitions.

Suggested Citation

  • Brodsky, Casey N. & Bucala, Matthew D. & Rowland, Sebastian T. & Michanowicz, Drew R., 2024. "The burden of natural gas leaks on public sector emergency response in the United States," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:192:y:2024:i:c:s0301421524002349
    DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114214
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421524002349
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114214?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Glasmeier, Amy K. & Williams, Darien Alexander, 2022. "Toward a theory of high reliability for natural gas distribution utilities," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    2. Castaneda, Monica & Jimenez, Maritza & Zapata, Sebastian & Franco, Carlos J. & Dyner, Isaac, 2017. "Myths and facts of the utility death spiral," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 105-116.
    3. Brand, Sam & Price, Richard, 2000. "The economic and social costs of crime," MPRA Paper 74968, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Siler-Evans, Kyle & Hanson, Alex & Sunday, Cecily & Leonard, Nathan & Tumminello, Michele, 2014. "Analysis of pipeline accidents in the United States from 1968 to 2009," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 7(4), pages 257-269.
    5. Erwin Blackstone & Andrew Buck & Simon Hakim, 2007. "The economics of emergency response," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 40(4), pages 313-334, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Giacomo Di Gennaro & Antonio La Spina, 2016. "The costs of illegality: a research programme," Global Crime, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(1), pages 1-20, January.
    2. Stephen Machin & Olivier Marie, 2011. "Crime And Police Resources: The Street Crime Initiative," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 9(4), pages 678-701, August.
    3. Pradiptyo, Rimawan, 2012. "Does Corruption Pay in Indonesia? If So, Who are Benefited the Most?," MPRA Paper 41384, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Stephen Machin & Olivier Marie, 2006. "Crime and benefit sanctions," Portuguese Economic Journal, Springer;Instituto Superior de Economia e Gestao, vol. 5(2), pages 149-165, August.
    5. Fuat Oğuz, 2020. "Hayekian complexity and the role of regulation in electricity markets," Economic Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(3), pages 406-418, October.
    6. Timothy Besley & Hannes Mueller, 2018. "Predation, Protection, and Productivity: A Firm-Level Perspective," American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 10(2), pages 184-221, April.
    7. Paolo Buonanno & Daniel Montolio & Josep Raya-Vílchez, 2013. "Housing prices and crime perception," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 45(1), pages 305-321, August.
    8. Weigelt, Carmen & Lu, Shaohua & Verhaal, J. Cameron, 2021. "Blinded by the sun: The role of prosumers as niche actors in incumbent firms’ adoption of solar power during sustainability transitions," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(9).
    9. Inês, Campos & Guilherme, Pontes Luz & Esther, Marín-González & Swantje, Gährs & Stephen, Hall & Lars, Holstenkamp, 2020. "Regulatory challenges and opportunities for collective renewable energy prosumers in the EU," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    10. Sijbren Cnossen, 2006. "Alcohol Taxation and Regulation in the European Union," CESifo Working Paper Series 1821, CESifo.
    11. Monica Castaneda & Sebastian Zapata & Andres Aristizabal, 2018. "Assessing the Effect of Incentive Policies on Residential PV Investments in Colombia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-17, October.
    12. Steve Gibbons, 2004. "The Costs of Urban Property Crime," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 114(499), pages 441-463, November.
    13. Wickramasekera, Nyantara & Wright, Judy & Elsey, Helen & Murray, Jenni & Tubeuf, Sandy, 2015. "Cost of crime: A systematic review," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 43(3), pages 218-228.
    14. Pinho, Joana & Resende, Joana & Soares, Isabel, 2018. "Capacity investment in electricity markets under supply and demand uncertainty," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 1006-1017.
    15. Ms. Concha Verdugo Yepes & Mr. Peter L. Pedroni & Xingwei Hu, 2015. "Crime and the Economy in Mexican States: Heterogeneous Panel Estimates (1993-2012)," IMF Working Papers 2015/121, International Monetary Fund.
    16. Marco Francesconi & Jonathan James, 2015. "The Cost of Binge Drinking," Department of Economics Working Papers 36/15, University of Bath, Department of Economics.
    17. Malvina Bondy & Sefi Roth & Lutz Sager, 2020. "Crime Is in the Air: The Contemporaneous Relationship between Air Pollution and Crime," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 7(3), pages 555-585.
    18. Adriana Villamarin Garcia, 2011. "Prevenir y calcular una estimacion de los costos de la violencia homicida en Colombia," Documentos de CERAC 9108, CERAC -Centro de Recursos para el Análisis de Conflictos.
    19. Katarzyna Sienkiewicz-Małyjurek, 2022. "Interpretive structural modelling of inter-agency collaboration risk in public safety networks," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(3), pages 1193-1221, June.
    20. Sam Wilkinson & Michele John & Gregory M. Morrison, 2021. "Rooftop PV and the Renewable Energy Transition; a Review of Driving Forces and Analytical Frameworks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-25, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:192:y:2024:i:c:s0301421524002349. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.