IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i14p4990-d858163.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Revisiting Home Heat Control Theories through a UK Care Home Field Trial

Author

Listed:
  • Victoria Aragon

    (Faculty of Engineering & Physical Sciences, Boldrewood Innovation Campus, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 7QF, UK)

  • Patrick James

    (Faculty of Engineering & Physical Sciences, Boldrewood Innovation Campus, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 7QF, UK)

  • Stephanie Gauthier

    (Faculty of Engineering & Physical Sciences, Boldrewood Innovation Campus, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 7QF, UK)

Abstract

Smart heating controls are being introduced in the domestic sector with the aim of reducing heating demand in buildings. However, the impact of controls on heat demand is not fully understood. This study set out to add empirical evidence to Kempton’s theory on mental models of home heat controls. With this purpose, radiator setpoint records from smart thermostatic valves in 47 flats from a care home in the South of England were evaluated over a 12-month period. Three types of households were identified: (i) low interactors who do not have interaction, or have minimal interaction, with the controls (24.5%); (ii) medium interactors who adjust their setpoint when the outdoor temperature changes and whose behavior is comparable to households that have a “feedback” mental model (49%); and (iii) high interactors who adjust the setpoint based on their own strategy, which does not necessarily follow outdoor temperature changes and reflects a lack of understanding of how the controls work (26.5%). These results highlight the contrast between expected and actual usage of home heat controls, as only half of the residents showed a behavior that is consistent with the principles of operation of the STVs.

Suggested Citation

  • Victoria Aragon & Patrick James & Stephanie Gauthier, 2022. "Revisiting Home Heat Control Theories through a UK Care Home Field Trial," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-16, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:14:p:4990-:d:858163
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/14/4990/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/14/4990/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhang, Tao & Siebers, Peer-Olaf & Aickelin, Uwe, 2012. "A three-dimensional model of residential energy consumer archetypes for local energy policy design in the UK," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 102-110.
    2. Lewis, Alan, 2015. "Designing for an imagined user: Provision for thermal comfort in energy-efficient extra-care housing," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 204-212.
    3. Brounen, Dirk & Kok, Nils & Quigley, John M., 2013. "Energy literacy, awareness, and conservation behavior of residential households," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 42-50.
    4. Turner, W.J.N. & Walker, I.S. & Roux, J., 2015. "Peak load reductions: Electric load shifting with mechanical pre-cooling of residential buildings with low thermal mass," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 1057-1067.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Yongbao & Chen, Zhe & Xu, Peng & Li, Weilin & Sha, Huajing & Yang, Zhiwei & Li, Guowen & Hu, Chonghe, 2019. "Quantification of electricity flexibility in demand response: Office building case study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    2. Tang, Rui & Li, Hangxin & Wang, Shengwei, 2019. "A game theory-based decentralized control strategy for power demand management of building cluster using thermal mass and energy storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 809-820.
    3. Stefano Ceolotto & Eleanor Denny, 2021. "Putting a new 'spin' on energy labels: measuring the impact of reframing energy efficiency on tumble dryer choices in a multi-country experiment," Trinity Economics Papers tep1521, Trinity College Dublin, Department of Economics.
    4. Dujuan Yang & Harry Timmermans & Aloys Borgers, 2016. "The prevalence of context-dependent adjustment of activity-travel patterns in energy conservation strategies: results from a mixture-amount stated adaptation experiment," Transportation, Springer, vol. 43(1), pages 79-100, January.
    5. Fetzer, Thiemo & Gazze, Ludovica & Bishop, Menna, 2022. "Distributional and climate implications of policy responses to the energy crisis: Lessons from the UK," CAGE Online Working Paper Series 644, Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE).
    6. Schleich, Joachim & Gassmann, Xavier & Faure, Corinne & Meissner, Thomas, 2016. "Making the implicit explicit: A look inside the implicit discount rate," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 321-331.
    7. Asmare, Fissha & Giedraitis, Vincentas & Jaraitė, Jūratė & Kažukauskas, Andrius, 2023. "Energy-related financial literacy and retrofits of Soviet-era apartment buildings: The case of Lithuania," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    8. Fouladvand, Javanshir & Aranguren Rojas, Maria & Hoppe, Thomas & Ghorbani, Amineh, 2022. "Simulating thermal energy community formation: Institutional enablers outplaying technological choice," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 306(PA).
    9. Virkki-Hatakka, Terhi & Luoranen, Mika & Ikävalko, Markku, 2013. "Differences in perception: How the experts look at energy efficiency (findings from a Finnish survey)," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 499-508.
    10. Stefan Ambec & Claude Crampes, 2021. "Real-time electricity pricing to balance green energy intermittency," Post-Print hal-04755370, HAL.
    11. Broberg, Thomas & Kažukauskas, Andrius, 2021. "Information policies and biased cost perceptions - The case of Swedish residential energy consumption," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    12. Astier, Nicolas, 2018. "Comparative feedbacks under incomplete information," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 90-108.
    13. Yun-Gi Hwang & Soohyun Park & Daecheol Kim, 2018. "Efficiency Analysis of Official Development Assistance Provided by Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-13, August.
    14. Sylwia Słupik & Joanna Kos-Łabędowicz & Joanna Trzęsiok, 2021. "Energy-Related Behaviour of Consumers from the Silesia Province (Poland)—Towards a Low-Carbon Economy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-23, April.
    15. E. Denny, 2022. "Long-term Energy Cost Labelling for Appliances: Evidence from a Randomised Controlled Trial in Ireland," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 45(3), pages 369-409, September.
    16. Pothitou, Mary & Hanna, Richard F. & Chalvatzis, Konstantinos J., 2016. "Environmental knowledge, pro-environmental behaviour and energy savings in households: An empirical study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 1217-1229.
    17. Baikowski, Martin, 2018. "Impacts of consumers' electricity price misperceptions," CAWM Discussion Papers 105, University of Münster, Münster Center for Economic Policy (MEP).
    18. Nicolas Astier, 2016. "Comparative Feedbacks under Incomplete Information," Working Papers hal-01465189, HAL.
    19. Petricli, Gulcan & Inkaya, Tulin & Gokay Emel, Gul, 2024. "Identifying green citizen typologies by mining household-level survey data," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 189(PA).
    20. Girod, Bastien & Stucki, Tobias & Woerter, Martin, 2017. "How do policies for efficient energy use in the household sector induce energy-efficiency innovation? An evaluation of European countries," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 223-237.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:14:p:4990-:d:858163. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.