IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i11p3902-d823713.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inequalities in Regional Level Domestic CO 2 Emissions and Energy Use: A Case Study of Iran

Author

Listed:
  • Behnam Ata

    (Department of Social Geography and Regional Development, University of Debrecen, H-4023 Debrecen, Hungary)

  • Parisa Pakrooh

    (Department of Agricultural Economics Engineering, University of Tabriz, Tabriz 5166616471, Iran)

  • Ayoub Barkat

    (Department of Landscape Protection and Environmental Geography, University of Debrecen, H-4032 Debrecen, Hungary)

  • Ramzi Benhizia

    (Department of Landscape Protection and Environmental Geography, University of Debrecen, H-4032 Debrecen, Hungary)

  • János Pénzes

    (Department of Social Geography and Regional Development, University of Debrecen, H-4023 Debrecen, Hungary)

Abstract

An increasing amount of CO 2 emissions from the household sector of Iran led us to analyze the inequality and understand the possible driving force behind the CO 2 emissions. The study of inequality provides information to policy-makers to point policies in the right direction. By considering the differences in the socio-economic factors of provinces, the study aims to analyze the inequality in CO 2 emissions and different kinds of energy consumption, including oil, gas and electricity, for the household sector of Iran’s provinces between 2000 and 2017. For this aim, the Theil index and Kaya factor, as a simple and common method, were considered to evaluate the inequality in both CO 2 emissions and energy consumption, and determine the driving factor behind CO 2 emissions. According to the results, inequality in oil and natural gas consumption were increasing, electricity was almost constant; however, CO 2 emissions experienced a decreasing trend for the study period. The Theil index changed from 0.4 to 0.65 for oil, from 0.18 to 0.22 for natural gas, from 0.17 to 0.15 for electricity, and from 0.2 to 0.14 for CO 2 emissions between 2001 and 2017. In addition, the results of the inequality study indicated that most of the inequalities belong to within-group inequalities in energy consumption and CO 2 emissions. The results of the Kaya factor indicate that the second factor, energy efficiency, with a 0.21 value was the main driving factor of inequalities in CO 2 emissions; however, the first factor, energy consumption, can be a potential factor for inequality in the following years, as it increased from 0.00 to 0.11 between 2001 and 2017. It seems that by removing the energy subsidy policy in 2010 and 2013, low-standard and energy-wasting old vehicles were the most effective factors of energy inefficiency in the household sector, which need more accurate policy-making.

Suggested Citation

  • Behnam Ata & Parisa Pakrooh & Ayoub Barkat & Ramzi Benhizia & János Pénzes, 2022. "Inequalities in Regional Level Domestic CO 2 Emissions and Energy Use: A Case Study of Iran," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-26, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:11:p:3902-:d:823713
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/11/3902/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/11/3902/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cantore, Nicola & Padilla, Emilio, 2010. "Equality and CO2 emissions distribution in climate change integrated assessment modelling," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 298-313.
    2. Padilla, Emilio & Serrano, Alfredo, 2006. "Inequality in CO2 emissions across countries and its relationship with income inequality: A distributive approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(14), pages 1762-1772, September.
    3. Aaberge, Rolf & Mogstad, Magne & Peragine, Vito, 2011. "Measuring long-term inequality of opportunity," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(3), pages 193-204.
    4. Dalia Streimikiene & Vidas Lekavičius & Tomas Baležentis & Grigorios L. Kyriakopoulos & Josef Abrhám, 2020. "Climate Change Mitigation Policies Targeting Households and Addressing Energy Poverty in European Union," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-24, July.
    5. Khalili Araghi, Mansor & Barkhordari, Sajjad, 2012. "An evaluation of the welfare effects of reducing energy subsides in Iran," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 398-404.
    6. Salois, Matthew J., 2013. "Regional changes in the distribution of foreign aid: An entropy approach," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 392(13), pages 2893-2902.
    7. Cowell, Frank, 2011. "Measuring Inequality," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, edition 3, number 9780199594047.
    8. Bianco, Vincenzo & Cascetta, Furio & Marino, Alfonso & Nardini, Sergio, 2019. "Understanding energy consumption and carbon emissions in Europe: A focus on inequality issues," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 120-130.
    9. Scarpellini, Sabina & Rivera-Torres, Pilar & Suárez-Perales, Inés & Aranda-Usón, Alfonso, 2015. "Analysis of energy poverty intensity from the perspective of the regional administration: Empirical evidence from households in southern Europe," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 729-738.
    10. Duro, Juan Antonio & Padilla, Emilio, 2011. "Inequality across countries in energy intensities: An analysis of the role of energy transformation and final energy consumption," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 474-479, May.
    11. Hedenus, Fredrik & Azar, Christian, 2005. "Estimates of trends in global income and resource inequalities," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(3), pages 351-364, November.
    12. Groot, Loek, 2010. "Carbon Lorenz curves," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 45-64, January.
    13. Bourguignon, Francois, 1979. "Decomposable Income Inequality Measures," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 47(4), pages 901-920, July.
    14. Padilla, Emilio & Duro, Juan Antonio, 2013. "Explanatory factors of CO2 per capita emission inequality in the European Union," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 1320-1328.
    15. Ling Yang & Kai Zhao & Yankai Zhao & Mengyuan Zhong, 2021. "Identifying Key Factors in Determining Disparities in Energy Consumption in China: A Household Level Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-20, November.
    16. Daniel Millimet & Daniel Slottje, 2002. "An environmental Paglin-Gini," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(4), pages 271-274.
    17. Śmiech, Sławomir & Papież, Monika, 2014. "Energy consumption and economic growth in the light of meeting the targets of energy policy in the EU: The bootstrap panel Granger causality approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 118-129.
    18. Barkhordar, Zahra A., 2019. "Evaluating the economy-wide effects of energy efficient lighting in the household sector of Iran," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 125-133.
    19. Zhang, ZhongXiang, 2004. "Meeting the Kyoto targets: the importance of developing country participation," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 3-19, January.
    20. Sohag, Kazi & Begum, Rawshan Ara & Abdullah, Sharifah Mastura Syed & Jaafar, Mokhtar, 2015. "Dynamics of energy use, technological innovation, economic growth and trade openness in Malaysia," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P2), pages 1497-1507.
    21. Patrick Nussbaumer & Francesco Fuso Nerini & Ijeoma Onyeji & Mark Howells, 2013. "Global Insights Based on the Multidimensional Energy Poverty Index (MEPI)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(5), pages 1-17, May.
    22. Moshiri, Saeed, 2015. "The effects of the energy price reform on households consumption in Iran," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 177-188.
    23. Minkyu Kim & Chankook Park, 2021. "Academic Topics Related to Household Energy Consumption Using the Future Sign Detection Technique," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-24, December.
    24. Soltani, Mohammad & Rahmani, Omeid & Ghasimi, Dara S.M. & Ghaderpour, Yousef & Pour, Amin Beiranvand & Misnan, Siti Hajar & Ngah, Ibrahim, 2020. "Impact of household demographic characteristics on energy conservation and carbon dioxide emission: Case from Mahabad city, Iran," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    25. Wang, H. & Zhou, P., 2018. "Assessing Global CO2 Emission Inequality From Consumption Perspective: An Index Decomposition Analysis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 257-271.
    26. Mohammad Soltani & Omeid Rahmani & Amin Beiranvand Pour & Yousef Ghaderpour & Ibrahim Ngah & Siti Hajar Misnan, 2019. "Determinants of Variation in Household Energy Choice and Consumption: Case from Mahabad City, Iran," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-20, September.
    27. Borozan, Djula, 2018. "Regional-level household energy consumption determinants: The european perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 347-355.
    28. Andreoni, Valeria & Galmarini, Stefano, 2016. "Drivers in CO2 emissions variation: A decomposition analysis for 33 world countries," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 27-37.
    29. Jin Zhang & Lianrui Ma & Jinkai Li, 2021. "Why Low-Carbon Publicity Effect Limits? The Role of Heterogeneous Intention in Reducing Household Energy Consumption," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-17, November.
    30. Jaffe, Adam B. & Stavins, Robert N., 1994. "The energy-efficiency gap What does it mean?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 22(10), pages 804-810, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pan, Xiongfeng & Guo, Shucen, 2024. "Decomposition analysis of regional differences in China's carbon emissions based on socio-economic factors," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 303(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Juan Antonio Duro Moreno & Jordi Teixidó-Figueras & Emilio Padilla Rosa, 2013. "Empirics of the international inequality in CO2 emissions intensity: explanatory factors according to complementary decomposition methodologies," Working Papers wpdea1305, Department of Applied Economics at Universitat Autonoma of Barcelona.
    2. Padilla, Emilio & Duro, Juan Antonio, 2013. "Explanatory factors of CO2 per capita emission inequality in the European Union," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 1320-1328.
    3. Chen, Jiandong & Cheng, Shulei & Song, Malin, 2017. "Decomposing inequality in energy-related CO2 emissions by source and source increment: The roles of production and residential consumption," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 698-710.
    4. Jordi Teixidó-Figueras & Juan Duro, 2015. "International Ecological Footprint Inequality: A Methodological Review and Some Results," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 60(4), pages 607-631, April.
    5. Mussini, Mauro & Grossi, Luigi, 2015. "Decomposing changes in CO2 emission inequality over time: The roles of re-ranking and changes in per capita CO2 emission disparities," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 274-281.
    6. Remuzgo, Lorena & Trueba, Carmen & Sarabia, José María, 2016. "Evolution of the global inequality in greenhouse gases emissions using multidimensional generalized entropy measures," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 444(C), pages 146-157.
    7. Emilio Padilla Rosa & Evans Jadotte, 2020. "The determinants of the inequality in CO2 emissions per capita between developing countries," Working Papers wpdea2012, Department of Applied Economics at Universitat Autonoma of Barcelona.
    8. Duro, Juan Antonio, 2013. "Weighting vectors and international inequality changes in environmental indicators: An analysis of CO2 per capita emissions and Kaya factors," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 122-127.
    9. Moises Neil V. Seriño, 2020. "Rising carbon footprint inequality in the Philippines," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 22(2), pages 173-195, April.
    10. Chen, Lei & Xu, Linyu & Yang, Zhifeng, 2019. "Inequality of industrial carbon emissions of the urban agglomeration and its peripheral cities: A case in the Pearl River Delta, China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 438-447.
    11. Juan Antonio Duro & Jordi Teixidó-Figueras & Emilio Padilla, 2017. "The Causal Factors of International Inequality in $$\hbox {CO}_{2}$$ CO 2 Emissions Per Capita: A Regression-Based Inequality Decomposition Analysis," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 67(4), pages 683-700, August.
    12. Teixidó Figueras, Jordi & Duro Moreno, Juan Antonio, 2012. "Ecological Footprint Inequality: A methodological review and some results," Working Papers 2072/203168, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Department of Economics.
    13. Duro, Juan Antonio & Padilla, Emilio, 2011. "Inequality across countries in energy intensities: An analysis of the role of energy transformation and final energy consumption," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 474-479, May.
    14. Pan, Xunzhang & Teng, Fei & Wang, Gehua, 2014. "A comparison of carbon allocation schemes: On the equity-efficiency tradeoff," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 222-229.
    15. Lorena Remuzgo & Jose Maria Sarabia, 2015. "A general factorial decomposition of the second Theil index of inequality with applications in environmental economics," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 35(2), pages 1369-1378.
    16. Ge Wang & Juan Yang & Dinghua Ou & Yalan Xiong & Ouping Deng & Qiquan Li, 2019. "Temporal-Spatial Variations and Regional Disparities in Land-Use Efficiency, and the Response to Demographic Transition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-22, August.
    17. Chen, Jiandong & Cheng, Shulei & Song, Malin & Wu, Yinyin, 2016. "A carbon emissions reduction index: Integrating the volume and allocation of regional emissions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 1154-1164.
    18. Rongrong Li & Xue-Ting Jiang, 2017. "Inequality of Carbon Intensity: Empirical Analysis of China 2000–2014," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-12, April.
    19. Remuzgo, Lorena & Sarabia, José María, 2013. "Desigualdad en la distribución mundial de emisiones de CO2 por sectores: Descomposición y estudio de sensibilidad/Inequality of Global Distribution of CO2 Emissions by Sector: Decomposition and Sensit," Estudios de Economia Aplicada, Estudios de Economia Aplicada, vol. 31, pages 65-92, Enero.
    20. Chen, Jiandong & Cheng, Shulei & Song, Malin & Wang, Jia, 2016. "Interregional differences of coal carbon dioxide emissions in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 1-13.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:11:p:3902-:d:823713. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.