IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i10p3745-d819493.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Fouling Effect on Commercial Ceramic Membranes during Filtration of Microalgae Chlorella vulgaris and Monoraphidium contortum

Author

Listed:
  • Arkadiusz Nędzarek

    (Department of Aquatic Bioengineering and Aquaculture, Faculty of Food Sciences and Fisheries, West Pomeranian University of Technology Szczecin, 70-310 Szczecin, Poland)

  • Piotr Tomasz Mitkowski

    (Faculty of Chemical Technology, Poznań University of Technology, 60-965 Poznań, Poland)

Abstract

Although interest in the use of membranes for the concentration of microalgal biomass has steadily been growing, little is known regarding the phenomena of membrane fouling. In addition, more attention has been given to polymeric membranes compared to ceramic membranes, which have a longer life that is associated with a higher resistance to aggressive chemical cleaning. In this study, microfiltration (MF) and ultrafiltration (UF) of two microalgae species, Chlorella vulgaris and Monoraphidium contortum , were carried out using tubular crossflow ceramic membranes. Permeate flux was measured, resistance was calculated, and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) was determined. The flux reduction during the first 10 min of filtration was higher for MF than UF (>70% and <50%), and steady-state permeate fluxes were <5% (for MF) and <25% (for UF) of initial (in m 3 m −2 s −1 ) 6.2 × 10 −4 (for MF) and 1.7 × 10 −4 (for UF). Total resistances (in m −1 ) were in the ranges of 4.2–5.4 × 10 12 (UF) and 2.6–3.1 × 10 12 (MF) for M. contortum and C. vulgaris , respectively. DOC reduction was higher for UF membrane (>80%) than for MF (<66%) and DOC concentrations (mg C L −1 ) in permeates following MF and UF were about five and two, respectively. In conclusion, we demonstrated: (i) higher irreversible resistance for UF and reversible resistance for MF; (ii) permeate flux higher for UF and for M. contortum ; (iii) the significant role of dissolved organic compounds in the formation of reversible resistance for MF and irreversible resistance for UF.

Suggested Citation

  • Arkadiusz Nędzarek & Piotr Tomasz Mitkowski, 2022. "The Fouling Effect on Commercial Ceramic Membranes during Filtration of Microalgae Chlorella vulgaris and Monoraphidium contortum," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-12, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:10:p:3745-:d:819493
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/10/3745/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/10/3745/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hallenbeck, P.C. & Grogger, M. & Mraz, M. & Veverka, D., 2016. "Solar biofuels production with microalgae," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 136-145.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kuo, Yen-Ting & Almansa, G. Aranda & Vreugdenhil, B.J., 2018. "Catalytic aromatization of ethylene in syngas from biomass to enhance economic sustainability of gas production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 21-30.
    2. Pérez-López, Paula & de Vree, Jeroen H. & Feijoo, Gumersindo & Bosma, Rouke & Barbosa, Maria J. & Moreira, María Teresa & Wijffels, René H. & van Boxtel, Anton J.B. & Kleinegris, Dorinde M.M., 2017. "Comparative life cycle assessment of real pilot reactors for microalgae cultivation in different seasons," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 1151-1164.
    3. Sandra Lage & Zivan Gojkovic & Christiane Funk & Francesco G. Gentili, 2018. "Algal Biomass from Wastewater and Flue Gases as a Source of Bioenergy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-30, March.
    4. Sun, Zhe & Zhou, Zhi, 2019. "Nature-inspired virus-assisted algal cell disruption for cost-effective biofuel production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 1-1.
    5. Liu, Guicai & Liao, Yanfen & Wu, Yuting & Ma, Xiaoqian, 2018. "Synthesis gas production from microalgae gasification in the presence of Fe2O3 oxygen carrier and CaO additive," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 955-965.
    6. He, Zhixia & Wang, Bin & Zhang, Bo & Feng, Huan & Kandasamy, Sabariswaran & Chen, Haitao, 2020. "Synergistic effect of hydrothermal Co-liquefaction of Spirulina platensis and Lignin: Optimization of operating parameters by response surface methodology," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    7. Liu, Taixiu & Bai, Zhang & Zheng, Zhimei & Liu, Qibin & Lei, Jing & Sui, Jun & Jin, Hongguang, 2019. "100 kWe power generation pilot plant with a solar thermochemical process: design, modeling, construction, and testing," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 1-1.
    8. Sedlar, D. Karasalihović & Vulin, D. & Krajačić, G. & Jukić, L., 2019. "Offshore gas production infrastructure reutilisation for blue energy production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 159-174.
    9. Kuan Shiong Khoo & Wen Yi Chia & Doris Ying Ying Tang & Pau Loke Show & Kit Wayne Chew & Wei-Hsin Chen, 2020. "Nanomaterials Utilization in Biomass for Biofuel and Bioenergy Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-19, February.
    10. Xinru Zhang & Hao Yuan & Libo Guan & Xinyu Wang & Yi Wang & Zeyi Jiang & Limei Cao & Xinxin Zhang, 2019. "Influence of Photoperiods on Microalgae Biofilm: Photosynthetic Performance, Biomass Yield, and Cellular Composition," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-10, September.
    11. Muhammad Maqsood Alam & Abdul Samad Mumtaz & Megan Russell & Melanie Grogger & Don Veverka & Patrick C. Hallenbeck, 2019. "Isolation and Characterization of Microalgae from Diverse Pakistani Habitats: Exploring Third-Generation Biofuel Potential," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-17, July.
    12. Adeniyi, Oladapo Martins & Azimov, Ulugbek & Burluka, Alexey, 2018. "Algae biofuel: Current status and future applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 316-335.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:10:p:3745-:d:819493. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.