IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i10p3669-d817667.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Correlation between the Production of Electricity by Offshore Wind Farms and the Demand for Electricity in Polish Conditions

Author

Listed:
  • Arkadiusz Dobrzycki

    (Institute of Electrical Engineering and Electronics, Faculty of Automatic, Robotics and Electrical Engineering, Poznan University of Technology, 3A Piotrowo Street, 60-965 Poznan, Poland)

  • Jacek Roman

    (Institute of Electrical Power Engineering, Faculty of Environmental Engineering and Energy, Poznan University of Technology, 5 Piotrowo Street, 61-138 Poznan, Poland)

Abstract

Energy transition forcing a change in the structure of the electricity generation system is a particularly difficult task in countries such as Poland, where the dominant source of energy is fossil fuels. Due to the nature of renewable sources (stochastic and seasonally variable), it is necessary to study their impact on the power system. Much research was conducted on this subject. They consider modelling power systems in terms of dealing with an increasing amount of renewable energy sources, stabilization of electricity generation or environmental aspects. This article examines one of the key sources of future power systems—offshore wind turbines (OWT). The influence of offshore wind sources on the power system in the fields of stability of generation, methods of regulatory strategies, and economics were examined. One of the aspects that are less considered is the correlation of energy production in OWT with energy demand and with generation in other renewable energy sources, especially in the region of the southern Baltic Sea and the distribution of energy demand in countries such as Poland. The key aspect of the research is to fill this gap. The obtained results indicate that the average monthly power generation in OWT is strongly positively correlated with the demand, and the hourly average is positively correlated moderately. Correlation between generation in OWT and photovoltaic sources is very high negative, and between onshore and offshore wind turbines is highly positive. The study indicates that the OWT has a significant potential for the development and replacement of conventional sources, due to the very high capacity and a positive correlation with demand. Moreover, future offshore wind farms can cooperate with photovoltaic sources as these sources complement each other. On the other hand, a significant saturation of the system with offshore and onshore wind sources may pose a threat to the power system due to their positive correlation.

Suggested Citation

  • Arkadiusz Dobrzycki & Jacek Roman, 2022. "Correlation between the Production of Electricity by Offshore Wind Farms and the Demand for Electricity in Polish Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-18, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:10:p:3669-:d:817667
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/10/3669/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/10/3669/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wei Sun & Sam Harrison & Gareth P. Harrison, 2020. "Value of Local Offshore Renewable Resource Diversity for Network Hosting Capacity," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-20, November.
    2. Juan-Manuel Roldan-Fernandez & Javier Serrano-Gonzalez & Francisco Gonzalez-Longatt & Manuel Burgos-Payan, 2021. "Impact of Spanish Offshore Wind Generation in the Iberian Electricity Market: Potential Savings and Policy Implications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-17, July.
    3. César Henrique Mattos Pires & Felipe M. Pimenta & Carla A. D'Aquino & Osvaldo R. Saavedra & Xuerui Mao & Arcilan T. Assireu, 2020. "Coastal Wind Power in Southern Santa Catarina, Brazil," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-23, October.
    4. Christina Ortega & Amin Younes & Mark Severy & Charles Chamberlin & Arne Jacobson, 2020. "Resource and Load Compatibility Assessment of Wind Energy Offshore of Humboldt County, California," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-27, October.
    5. Amer Al-Hinai & Yassine Charabi & Seyed H. Aghay Kaboli, 2021. "Offshore Wind Energy Resource Assessment across the Territory of Oman: A Spatial-Temporal Data Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-18, March.
    6. Majed A. Alotaibi & Ali M. Eltamaly, 2021. "A Smart Strategy for Sizing of Hybrid Renewable Energy System to Supply Remote Loads in Saudi Arabia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-24, October.
    7. Yannek Bardenhagen & Toshihiko Nakata, 2020. "Regional Spatial Analysis of the Offshore Wind Potential in Japan," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-18, November.
    8. Travis C. Douville & Dhruv Bhatnagar, 2021. "Exploring the Grid Value of Offshore Wind Energy in Oregon," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-16, July.
    9. Jiarui Wang & Dexin Li & Xiangyu Lv & Xiangdong Meng & Jiajun Zhang & Tengfei Ma & Wei Pei & Hao Xiao, 2022. "Two-Stage Energy Management Strategies of Sustainable Wind-PV-Hydrogen-Storage Microgrid Based on Receding Horizon Optimization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-18, April.
    10. Marcin Pluta & Artur Wyrwa & Wojciech Suwała & Janusz Zyśk & Maciej Raczyński & Stanisław Tokarski, 2020. "A Generalized Unit Commitment and Economic Dispatch Approach for Analysing the Polish Power System under High Renewable Penetration," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-18, April.
    11. Martha N. Acosta & Francisco Gonzalez-Longatt & Juan Manuel Roldan-Fernandez & Manuel Burgos-Payan, 2021. "A Coordinated Control of Offshore Wind Power and BESS to Provide Power System Flexibility," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-17, July.
    12. Browning, Morgan S. & Lenox, Carol S., 2020. "Contribution of offshore wind to the power grid: U.S. air quality implications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    13. Chaouachi, Aymen & Covrig, Catalin Felix & Ardelean, Mircea, 2017. "Multi-criteria selection of offshore wind farms: Case study for the Baltic States," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 179-192.
    14. Sylwester Kaczmarzewski & Piotr Olczak & Maciej Sołtysik, 2021. "The Impact of Electricity Consumption Profile in Underground Mines to Cooperate with RES," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-20, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Piotr Olczak & Dominika Matuszewska, 2023. "Energy Storage Potential Needed at the National Grid Scale (Poland) in Order to Stabilize Daily Electricity Production from Fossil Fuels and Nuclear Power," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-11, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wiegner, J.F. & Andreasson, L.M. & Kusters, J.E.H. & Nienhuis, R.M., 2024. "Interdisciplinary perspectives on offshore energy system integration in the North Sea: A systematic literature review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 189(PA).
    2. Deveci, Muhammet & Cali, Umit & Kucuksari, Sadik & Erdogan, Nuh, 2020. "Interval type-2 fuzzy sets based multi-criteria decision-making model for offshore wind farm development in Ireland," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    3. Hugo Díaz & Carlos Guedes Soares, 2021. "A Multi-Criteria Approach to Evaluate Floating Offshore Wind Farms Siting in the Canary Islands (Spain)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-18, February.
    4. Shih-Chieh Liao & Shih-Chieh Chang & Tsung-Chi Cheng, 2021. "Managing the Volatility Risk of Renewable Energy: Index Insurance for Offshore Wind Farms in Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-27, August.
    5. Leijiao Ge & Jun Yan & Yonghui Sun & Zhongguan Wang, 2022. "Situational Awareness for Smart Distribution Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-3, June.
    6. Italo Fernandes & Felipe M. Pimenta & Osvaldo R. Saavedra & Arcilan T. Assireu, 2022. "Exploring the Complementarity of Offshore Wind Sites to Reduce the Seasonal Variability of Generation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-24, September.
    7. Ahmed H. EL-Ebiary & Mahmoud A. Attia & Mostafa I. Marei & Mariam A. Sameh, 2022. "An Integrated Seamless Control Strategy for Distributed Generators Based on a Deep Learning Artificial Neural Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-14, October.
    8. Liwen Zhu & Jun He & Lixun He & Wentao Huang & Yanyang Wang & Zong Liu, 2022. "Optimal Operation Strategy of PV-Charging-Hydrogenation Composite Energy Station Considering Demand Response," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-23, August.
    9. Geovanni Hernández Galvez & Daniel Chuck Liévano & Omar Sarracino Martínez & Orlando Lastres Danguillecourt & José Rafael Dorrego Portela & Antonio Trujillo Narcía & Ricardo Saldaña Flores & Liliana P, 2022. "Harnessing Offshore Wind Energy along the Mexican Coastline in the Gulf of Mexico—An Exploratory Study including Sustainability Criteria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-26, May.
    10. Wang, Hao & Wang, Tongguang & Ke, Shitang & Hu, Liang & Xie, Jiaojie & Cai, Xin & Cao, Jiufa & Ren, Yuxin, 2023. "Assessing code-based design wind loads for offshore wind turbines in China against typhoons," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 669-682.
    11. Virtanen, E.A. & Lappalainen, J. & Nurmi, M. & Viitasalo, M. & Tikanmäki, M. & Heinonen, J. & Atlaskin, E. & Kallasvuo, M. & Tikkanen, H. & Moilanen, A., 2022. "Balancing profitability of energy production, societal impacts and biodiversity in offshore wind farm design," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    12. Paweł Ziemba & Jarosław Wątróbski & Magdalena Zioło & Artur Karczmarczyk, 2017. "Using the PROSA Method in Offshore Wind Farm Location Problems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-20, November.
    13. Haibing Wang & Chengmin Wang & Weiqing Sun & Muhammad Qasim Khan, 2022. "Energy Pricing and Management for the Integrated Energy Service Provider: A Stochastic Stackelberg Game Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-15, October.
    14. Rémi Delage & Taichi Matsuoka & Toshihiko Nakata, 2021. "Spatial–Temporal Estimation and Analysis of Japan Onshore and Offshore Wind Energy Potential," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-12, April.
    15. Ziemba, Paweł, 2022. "Uncertain Multi-Criteria analysis of offshore wind farms projects investments – Case study of the Polish Economic Zone of the Baltic Sea," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 309(C).
    16. Dong, Weiwei & Zhao, Guohua & Yüksel, Serhat & Dinçer, Hasan & Ubay, Gözde Gülseven, 2022. "A novel hybrid decision making approach for the strategic selection of wind energy projects," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 321-337.
    17. Jessica Weber & Johann Köppel, 2022. "Can MCDA Serve Ex-Post to Indicate ‘Winners and Losers’ in Sustainability Dilemmas? A Case Study of Marine Spatial Planning in Germany," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-30, October.
    18. Gherboudj, Imen & Zorgati, Mohamed & Chamarthi, Phani-Kumar & Tuomiranta, Arttu & Mohandes, Baraa & Beegum, Naseema S. & Al-Sudairi, Jood & Al-Owain, Omar & Shibli, Hussain & El-Moursi, Mohamed & Ghed, 2021. "Renewable energy management system for Saudi Arabia: Methodology and preliminary results," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    19. César Berna-Escriche & Carlos Vargas-Salgado & David Alfonso-Solar & Alberto Escrivá-Castells, 2022. "Hydrogen Production from Surplus Electricity Generated by an Autonomous Renewable System: Scenario 2040 on Grand Canary Island, Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-29, September.
    20. Lorenzo Cottura & Riccardo Caradonna & Alberto Ghigo & Riccardo Novo & Giovanni Bracco & Giuliana Mattiazzo, 2021. "Dynamic Modeling of an Offshore Floating Wind Turbine for Application in the Mediterranean Sea," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-34, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:10:p:3669-:d:817667. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.