IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i21p5707-d438389.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Resource and Load Compatibility Assessment of Wind Energy Offshore of Humboldt County, California

Author

Listed:
  • Christina Ortega

    (Schatz Energy Research Center, 1 Harpst St, Arcata, CA 95521, USA)

  • Amin Younes

    (Schatz Energy Research Center, 1 Harpst St, Arcata, CA 95521, USA
    Department of Environmental Resources Engineering, Humboldt State University, 1 Harpst St, Arcata, CA 95521, USA)

  • Mark Severy

    (Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, 1100 Dexter Ave. N, Seattle, WA 98109, USA)

  • Charles Chamberlin

    (Schatz Energy Research Center, 1 Harpst St, Arcata, CA 95521, USA
    Department of Environmental Resources Engineering, Humboldt State University, 1 Harpst St, Arcata, CA 95521, USA)

  • Arne Jacobson

    (Schatz Energy Research Center, 1 Harpst St, Arcata, CA 95521, USA
    Department of Environmental Resources Engineering, Humboldt State University, 1 Harpst St, Arcata, CA 95521, USA)

Abstract

Floating offshore wind is being considered in northern California as indicated by the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management’s issuance of a lease consideration in the Humboldt Call Area. Humboldt County offers access to this enormous resource, but local electric load and transmission are limited. The potential impacts of offshore wind generators at three different scales were studied using a regional grid model of Humboldt County. Offshore wind generation was calculated using modeled wind speed data and 12-MW turbine specifications and integrated with projected load and historical generation. Offshore wind farms deployed in the Humboldt Call Area achieve annual capacity factors between 45% and 54% after losses and maintenance. Power output is variable between and within seasons, with full power output 30% of the time and no output approximately 20% of the time. Electricity from a 48-MW wind farm provides 22% of regional load with limited exports. A 144-MW wind farm serves 38% of local load, exporting 40% of its electricity with the extant 70-MW transmission capacity. A full build-out of 1836 MW would result in 88% curtailment with existing transmission. Across scenarios, offshore wind variability necessitates reliance on existing power plants to meet local demand in periods of low wind.

Suggested Citation

  • Christina Ortega & Amin Younes & Mark Severy & Charles Chamberlin & Arne Jacobson, 2020. "Resource and Load Compatibility Assessment of Wind Energy Offshore of Humboldt County, California," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-27, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:21:p:5707-:d:438389
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/21/5707/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/21/5707/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yip, Chak Man Andrew & Gunturu, Udaya Bhaskar & Stenchikov, Georgiy L., 2016. "Wind resource characterization in the Arabian Peninsula," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 826-836.
    2. Draxl, Caroline & Clifton, Andrew & Hodge, Bri-Mathias & McCaa, Jim, 2015. "The Wind Integration National Dataset (WIND) Toolkit," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 355-366.
    3. Amirinia, Gholamreza & Mafi, Somayeh & Mazaheri, Said, 2017. "Offshore wind resource assessment of Persian Gulf using uncertainty analysis and GIS," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 915-929.
    4. Rehman, S. & El-Amin, I.M. & Ahmad, F. & Shaahid, S.M. & Al-Shehri, A.M. & Bakhashwain, J.M., 2007. "Wind power resource assessment for Rafha, Saudi Arabia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 11(5), pages 937-950, June.
    5. Wang, Yi-Hui & Walter, Ryan K. & White, Crow & Farr, Hayley & Ruttenberg, Benjamin I., 2019. "Assessment of surface wind datasets for estimating offshore wind energy along the Central California Coast," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 343-353.
    6. Dvorak, Michael J. & Archer, Cristina L. & Jacobson, Mark Z., 2010. "California offshore wind energy potential," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(6), pages 1244-1254.
    7. Chancham, Chana & Waewsak, Jompob & Gagnon, Yves, 2017. "Offshore wind resource assessment and wind power plant optimization in the Gulf of Thailand," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 706-731.
    8. Himri, Y. & Rehman, S. & Draoui, B. & Himri, S., 2008. "Wind power potential assessment for three locations in Algeria," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 12(9), pages 2495-2504, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yushi Kunugi & Toshi H. Arimura & Miwa Nakai, 2021. "The Long-Term Impact of Wind Power Generation on a Local Community: Economics Analysis of Subjective Well-Being Data in Chōshi City," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-18, July.
    2. Arkadiusz Dobrzycki & Jacek Roman, 2022. "Correlation between the Production of Electricity by Offshore Wind Farms and the Demand for Electricity in Polish Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-18, May.
    3. Shih-Chieh Liao & Shih-Chieh Chang & Tsung-Chi Cheng, 2021. "Managing the Volatility Risk of Renewable Energy: Index Insurance for Offshore Wind Farms in Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-27, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Xinping & Foley, Aoife & Zhang, Zenghai & Wang, Kaimin & O'Driscoll, Kieran, 2020. "An assessment of wind energy potential in the Beibu Gulf considering the energy demands of the Beibu Gulf Economic Rim," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    2. Ren, Guorui & Wan, Jie & Liu, Jinfu & Yu, Daren, 2019. "Characterization of wind resource in China from a new perspective," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 994-1010.
    3. Giani, Paolo & Tagle, Felipe & Genton, Marc G. & Castruccio, Stefano & Crippa, Paola, 2020. "Closing the gap between wind energy targets and implementation for emerging countries," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    4. Nie, Bingchuan & Li, Jiachun, 2018. "Technical potential assessment of offshore wind energy over shallow continent shelf along China coast," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 128(PA), pages 391-399.
    5. Mohandes, M. & Rehman, S. & Rahman, S.M., 2011. "Estimation of wind speed profile using adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS)," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(11), pages 4024-4032.
    6. Al-Nassar, W.K. & Neelamani, S. & Al-Salem, K.A. & Al-Dashti, H.A., 2019. "Feasibility of offshore wind energy as an alternative source for the state of Kuwait," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 783-796.
    7. Felipe Tagle & Marc G. Genton & Andrew Yip & Suleiman Mostamandi & Georgiy Stenchikov & Stefano Castruccio, 2020. "A high‐resolution bilevel skew‐t stochastic generator for assessing Saudi Arabia's wind energy resources," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(7), November.
    8. Langodan, Sabique & Viswanadhapalli, Yesubabu & Dasari, Hari Prasad & Knio, Omar & Hoteit, Ibrahim, 2016. "A high-resolution assessment of wind and wave energy potentials in the Red Sea," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 244-255.
    9. Travis C. Douville & Dhruv Bhatnagar, 2021. "Exploring the Grid Value of Offshore Wind Energy in Oregon," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-16, July.
    10. Salvação, N. & Guedes Soares, C., 2018. "Wind resource assessment offshore the Atlantic Iberian coast with the WRF model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 276-287.
    11. Valliyil Mohammed Aboobacker & Puthuveetil Razak Shanas & Subramanian Veerasingam & Ebrahim M. A. S. Al-Ansari & Fadhil N. Sadooni & Ponnumony Vethamony, 2021. "Long-Term Assessment of Onshore and Offshore Wind Energy Potentials of Qatar," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-21, February.
    12. He, Junyi & Chan, P.W. & Li, Qiusheng & Lee, C.W., 2020. "Spatiotemporal analysis of offshore wind field characteristics and energy potential in Hong Kong," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    13. Fahad Alharbi & Denes Csala, 2020. "Saudi Arabia’s Solar and Wind Energy Penetration: Future Performance and Requirements," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-18, January.
    14. Li, Jiale & Yu, Xiong (Bill), 2018. "Onshore and offshore wind energy potential assessment near Lake Erie shoreline: A spatial and temporal analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 1092-1107.
    15. Yip, Chak Man Andrew & Gunturu, Udaya Bhaskar & Stenchikov, Georgiy L., 2016. "Wind resource characterization in the Arabian Peninsula," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 826-836.
    16. Minhyeop Kang & Kyungnam Ko & Minyeong Kim, 2020. "Verification of the Reliability of Offshore Wind Resource Prediction Using an Atmosphere–Ocean Coupled Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, January.
    17. Peters, Jared L. & Remmers, Tiny & Wheeler, Andrew J. & Murphy, Jimmy & Cummins, Valerie, 2020. "A systematic review and meta-analysis of GIS use to reveal trends in offshore wind energy research and offer insights on best practices," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    18. Costoya, X. & deCastro, M. & Carvalho, D. & Gómez-Gesteira, M., 2020. "On the suitability of offshore wind energy resource in the United States of America for the 21st century," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    19. Shafiqur Rehman & Md. Mahbub Alam & Luai M. Alhems & M. Mujahid Rafique, 2018. "Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine Blade Design Methodologies for Efficiency Enhancement—A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-34, February.
    20. Jared A. Lee & Paula Doubrawa & Lulin Xue & Andrew J. Newman & Caroline Draxl & George Scott, 2019. "Wind Resource Assessment for Alaska’s Offshore Regions: Validation of a 14-Year High-Resolution WRF Data Set," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-22, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:21:p:5707-:d:438389. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.