IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2021i1p30-d707899.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimization of Industry 4.0 Implementation Selection Process towards Enhancement of a Manual Assembly Line

Author

Listed:
  • Amanda Aljinović

    (Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture, University of Split, R. Boskovica 32, 21 000 Split, Croatia)

  • Nikola Gjeldum

    (Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture, University of Split, R. Boskovica 32, 21 000 Split, Croatia)

  • Boženko Bilić

    (Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture, University of Split, R. Boskovica 32, 21 000 Split, Croatia)

  • Marko Mladineo

    (Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture, University of Split, R. Boskovica 32, 21 000 Split, Croatia)

Abstract

Last year’s developments are characterized by a dramatic drop in customer demand leading to stiff competition and more challenges that each enterprise needs to cope with in a globalized market. Production in low-mix/high-volume batches is replaced with low-volume/high-variety production, which demands excessive information flow throughout production facilities. To cope with the excessive information flow, this production paradigm requires the integration of new advanced technology within production that enables the transformation of production towards smart production, i.e., towards Industry 4.0. The procedure that helps the decision-makers to select the most appropriate I4.0 technology to integrate within the current assembly line considering the expected outcomes of KPIs are not significantly been the subject of the research in the literature. Therefore, this research proposes a conceptual procedure that focus on the current state of the individual assembly line and proposes the technology to implement. The proposed solution is aligned with the expected strategic goals of the company since procedure takes into consideration value from the end-user perspective, current production plans, scheduling, throughput, and other relevant manufacturing metrics. The validation of the method was conducted on a real assembly line. The results of the validation study emphasize the importance of the individual approach for each assembly line since the preferences of the user as well as his diversified needs and possibilities affect the optimal technology selection.

Suggested Citation

  • Amanda Aljinović & Nikola Gjeldum & Boženko Bilić & Marko Mladineo, 2021. "Optimization of Industry 4.0 Implementation Selection Process towards Enhancement of a Manual Assembly Line," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-20, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2021:i:1:p:30-:d:707899
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/1/30/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/1/30/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sebastian Saniuk & Sandra Grabowska, 2021. "The Concept of Cyber-Physical Networks of Small and Medium Enterprises under Personalized Manufacturing," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-17, August.
    2. Sebastian Saniuk & Sandra Grabowska & Bożena Gajdzik, 2020. "Personalization of Products in the Industry 4.0 Concept and Its Impact on Achieving a Higher Level of Sustainable Consumption," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-19, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anna Kwiotkowska & Radosław Wolniak & Bożena Gajdzik & Magdalena Gębczyńska, 2022. "Configurational Paths of Leadership Competency Shortages and 4.0 Leadership Effectiveness: An fs/QCA Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-21, February.
    2. Theerasak Nitlarp & Supaporn Kiattisin, 2022. "The Impact Factors of Industry 4.0 on ESG in the Energy Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-19, July.
    3. Stéphanie Bouchard & Sébastien Gamache & Georges Abdulnour, 2023. "Operationalizing Mass Customization in Manufacturing SMEs—A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-21, February.
    4. Sebastian Saniuk & Sandra Grabowska, 2021. "The Concept of Cyber-Physical Networks of Small and Medium Enterprises under Personalized Manufacturing," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-17, August.
    5. Marina Crnjac Zizic & Marko Mladineo & Nikola Gjeldum & Luka Celent, 2022. "From Industry 4.0 towards Industry 5.0: A Review and Analysis of Paradigm Shift for the People, Organization and Technology," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-20, July.
    6. Rafał Trzaska & Adam Sulich & Michał Organa & Jerzy Niemczyk & Bartosz Jasiński, 2021. "Digitalization Business Strategies in Energy Sector: Solving Problems with Uncertainty under Industry 4.0 Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-21, November.
    7. Eric Gonu & Johnson Okeniyi & Gloria Kakrabah-Quarshie Agyapong, 2024. "Customer relationship management practices and organisational performance of commercial banks in Ghana: a mediation analysis," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 29(2), pages 607-624, June.
    8. Bożena Gajdzik & Sandra Grabowska & Sebastian Saniuk, 2021. "A Theoretical Framework for Industry 4.0 and Its Implementation with Selected Practical Schedules," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-24, February.
    9. Bożena Gajdzik & Włodzimierz Sroka, 2021. "Resource Intensity vs. Investment in Production Installations—The Case of the Steel Industry in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-16, January.
    10. Sandra Grabowska & Sebastian Saniuk, 2022. "Servitization and the Business Model of Cyber-Physical Networks in the Context of Personalized Production," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 955-966.
    11. Sebastian Saniuk & Sandra Grabowska & Wieslaw Grebski, 2022. "Knowledge and Skills Development in the Context of the Fourth Industrial Revolution Technologies: Interviews of Experts from Pennsylvania State of the USA," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-17, April.
    12. Tomasz Małysa & Bożena Gajdzik, 2020. "Predictive Models of Accidents at Work in the Steel Sector as a Framework for Sustainable Safety," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-20, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2021:i:1:p:30-:d:707899. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.