IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i9p2568-d546540.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Case Study of an Industrial Power Plant under Cyberattack: Simulation and Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Marilena Stănculescu

    (Department of Electrical Engineering, University Politehnica of Bucharest, 060042 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Sorin Deleanu

    (School of Applied Sciences and Technology, Northern Alberta Institute of Technology, Edmonton, AB T5G2R1, Canada)

  • Paul Cristian Andrei

    (Department of Electrical Engineering, University Politehnica of Bucharest, 060042 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Horia Andrei

    (Doctoral School of Engineering Sciences, University Valahia Targoviste, 130004 Targoviste, Romania)

Abstract

For critical infrastructures, technological developments regarding real-time data transmission and processing improve the system’s operability and reliability. However, vulnerabilities are introduced in the case of implementing new remote access methods or where redundancy is low. At the national level, most critical infrastructures are connected, and, therefore, achieving a level of security and resilience is based on identifying a multitude of risks. In this respect, the reduction of risk to acceptable levels directly affects the quality of citizens’ lives and decreases losses in the industry. This study starts from the threats to power systems, namely cyberattacks, which are much more dangerous, although less visible, to operators, and almost invisible to the public or the media. From this point of view, it was proved that the most vulnerable parts of the power system were human–machine interfaces, electrical equipment, Surveillance, Control, and Data Acquisition (SCADA) systems. This paper’s main achievements include the simulation of cyberattacks on existing electrical equipment from a petrochemical plant (case study), which consists of modifying the remote data transmitted by the SCADA system. Two locations were submitted to simulated cyberattacks that were considered critical for the overall plant operation. Furthermore, the changes that occur following each fault resulting from the cyberattack and the influence of the electrical parameter changes upon the process flow were analyzed. Furthermore, by using Electrical Power System Analysis Software—ETAP—the changes that occur following each fault due to the cyberattack and the influence of the electrical parameter changes upon the process flow were analyzed. By considering the two malfunction events, the resilience assessment of the system was analyzed. In the second case, only partial resilience action, up to 40%, restored the operability of the industrial power plant.

Suggested Citation

  • Marilena Stănculescu & Sorin Deleanu & Paul Cristian Andrei & Horia Andrei, 2021. "A Case Study of an Industrial Power Plant under Cyberattack: Simulation and Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-20, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:9:p:2568-:d:546540
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/9/2568/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/9/2568/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yuqi Han & Yunfeng Wen & Chuangxin Guo & Han Huang, 2015. "Incorporating Cyber Layer Failures in Composite Power System Reliability Evaluations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-23, August.
    2. Arghandeh, Reza & von Meier, Alexandra & Mehrmanesh, Laura & Mili, Lamine, 2016. "On the definition of cyber-physical resilience in power systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 1060-1069.
    3. Athira M. Mohan & Nader Meskin & Hasan Mehrjerdi, 2020. "A Comprehensive Review of the Cyber-Attacks and Cyber-Security on Load Frequency Control of Power Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-33, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Namhla Mtukushe & Adeniyi K. Onaolapo & Anuoluwapo Aluko & David G. Dorrell, 2023. "Review of Cyberattack Implementation, Detection, and Mitigation Methods in Cyber-Physical Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-25, July.
    2. Paul Cristian Andrei & Horia Andrei, 2022. "Power Systems’ Connectivity and Resiliency: Modeling, Simulation and Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-3, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mazur, Christoph & Hoegerle, Yannick & Brucoli, Maria & van Dam, Koen & Guo, Miao & Markides, Christos N. & Shah, Nilay, 2019. "A holistic resilience framework development for rural power systems in emerging economies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C), pages 219-232.
    2. Agbodoh-Falschau, Kouassi Raymond & Ravaonorohanta, Bako Harinivo, 2023. "Investigating the influence of governance determinants on reporting cybersecurity incidents to police: Evidence from Canadian organizations’ perspectives," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    3. Mujjuni, F. & Betts, T. & To, L.S. & Blanchard, R.E., 2021. "Resilience a means to development: A resilience assessment framework and a catalogue of indicators," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    4. Dui, Hongyan & Zhu, Yawen & Tao, Junyong, 2024. "Multi-phased resilience methodology of urban sewage treatment network based on the phase and node recovery importance in IoT," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    5. Xinghua Liu & Siwei Qiao & Zhiwei Liu, 2023. "A Survey on Load Frequency Control of Multi-Area Power Systems: Recent Challenges and Strategies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-22, February.
    6. Jaime Pilatásig & Diego Carrión & Manuel Jaramillo, 2022. "Resilience Maximization in Electrical Power Systems through Switching of Power Transmission Lines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-15, November.
    7. Liu, Hanchen & Wang, Chong & Ju, Ping & Li, Hongyu, 2022. "A sequentially preventive model enhancing power system resilience against extreme-weather-triggered failures," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    8. Habibollah Raoufi & Vahid Vahidinasab & Kamyar Mehran, 2020. "Power Systems Resilience Metrics: A Comprehensive Review of Challenges and Outlook," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-24, November.
    9. Hantao Cui & Yichen Zhang & Kevin L. Tomsovic & Fangxing (Fran) Li, 2022. "Power electronics‐interfaced cyber‐physical power systems: A review on modeling, simulation, and cybersecurity," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(6), November.
    10. Miłosz Stypiński & Marcin Niemiec, 2023. "Security of Neural Network-Based Key Agreement Protocol for Smart Grids," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-11, May.
    11. Félix Dubuisson & Miloud Rezkallah & Hussein Ibrahim & Ambrish Chandra, 2021. "Real-Time Implementation of the Predictive-Based Control with Bacterial Foraging Optimization Technique for Power Management in Standalone Microgrid Application," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-15, March.
    12. Sannamari Pilpola & Vahid Arabzadeh & Jani Mikkola & Peter D. Lund, 2019. "Analyzing National and Local Pathways to Carbon-Neutrality from Technology, Emissions, and Resilience Perspectives—Case of Finland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-22, March.
    13. Mousavizadeh, Saeed & Haghifam, Mahmoud-Reza & Shariatkhah, Mohammad-Hossein, 2018. "A linear two-stage method for resiliency analysis in distribution systems considering renewable energy and demand response resources," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 443-460.
    14. Antonio Pepiciello & Alfredo Vaccaro & Loi Lei Lai, 2020. "An Interval Mathematic-Based Methodology for Reliable Resilience Analysis of Power Systems in the Presence of Data Uncertainties," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-14, December.
    15. Zhou, Jian & Tsianikas, Stamatis & Birnie, Dunbar P. & Coit, David W., 2019. "Economic and resilience benefit analysis of incorporating battery storage to photovoltaic array generation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 652-662.
    16. Hao Ji & Meng Wang & Ting Yang & Junjie Zhao, 2018. "State feedback control aware stochastic transmitting latency in cyber-physical power system," International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, , vol. 14(9), pages 16878140187, September.
    17. Yongping Yang & Xiaoen Li & Zhiping Yang & Qing Wei & Ningling Wang & Ligang Wang, 2018. "The Application of Cyber Physical System for Thermal Power Plants: Data-Driven Modeling," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-16, March.
    18. Zaijing Gong & Dapeng Liang, 2017. "A resilience framework for safety management of fossil fuel power plant," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 89(3), pages 1081-1095, December.
    19. Xu, Sheng & Tu, Haicheng & Xia, Yongxiang, 2023. "Resilience enhancement of renewable cyber–physical power system against malware attacks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    20. Ángeles Verdejo-Espinosa & Macarena Espinilla-Estévez & Francisco Mata Mata, 2020. "Smart Grids and Their Role in Transforming Human Activities—A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-26, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:9:p:2568-:d:546540. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.