IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v74y2023ics0160791x23001148.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigating the influence of governance determinants on reporting cybersecurity incidents to police: Evidence from Canadian organizations’ perspectives

Author

Listed:
  • Agbodoh-Falschau, Kouassi Raymond
  • Ravaonorohanta, Bako Harinivo

Abstract

Government agencies and standard setters require organizations operating in critical infrastructure sectors to disclose cybersecurity incidents, yet little is known about whether organizations report these incidents to law enforcement. This study examines this issue based on data from the 2017–2021 periods of the Canadian Survey of Cybersecurity and Cybercrime administered to Canadian organizations. We assessed the effects of governance determinants along with cyber incidents and their impacts using partial least squares equation modelling to identify the relationships between these factors and cybersecurity incidents reported to police services. To conceptualize these relationships, we developed a framework based on resource-dependence theory, protection motivation theory, and previous empirical evidence. The overall governance determinants as well as the impacts of the incidents explained 51% of the intention to report cybersecurity incidents to police, and the intensity of the impacts explained 30% of these intentions to signal incidents to law enforcement. The results also revealed that the intensity of cyber incident impacts dictates the attitudes of organizations towards reporting digital attacks. This study makes a significant theoretical contribution to the information security literature and has practical implications for standard setters and government agencies that aim to combat cybersecurity incidents.

Suggested Citation

  • Agbodoh-Falschau, Kouassi Raymond & Ravaonorohanta, Bako Harinivo, 2023. "Investigating the influence of governance determinants on reporting cybersecurity incidents to police: Evidence from Canadian organizations’ perspectives," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:74:y:2023:i:c:s0160791x23001148
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102309
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X23001148
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102309?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Frank Cremer & Barry Sheehan & Michael Fortmann & Arash N. Kia & Martin Mullins & Finbarr Murphy & Stefan Materne, 2022. "Cyber risk and cybersecurity: a systematic review of data availability," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 47(3), pages 698-736, July.
    2. Athira M. Mohan & Nader Meskin & Hasan Mehrjerdi, 2020. "A Comprehensive Review of the Cyber-Attacks and Cyber-Security on Load Frequency Control of Power Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-33, July.
    3. Oliveira, Fabio & Kakabadse, Nada & Khan, Nadeem, 2022. "Board engagement with digital technologies: A resource dependence framework," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 804-818.
    4. Blakely, Benjamin & Kurtenbach, Jim & Nowak, Lovila, 2022. "Exploring the information content of cyber breach reports and the relationship to internal controls," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 46(C).
    5. Sylvie Héroux & Anne Fortin, 2020. "Cybersecurity Disclosure by the Companies on the S&P/TSX 60 Index," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(2), pages 73-100, June.
    6. Camélia Radu & Nadia Smaili, 2022. "Board Gender Diversity and Corporate Response to Cyber Risk: Evidence from Cybersecurity Related Disclosure," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 177(2), pages 351-374, May.
    7. Lee, In, 2021. "Cybersecurity: Risk management framework and investment cost analysis," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 64(5), pages 659-671.
    8. Smith, Thomas & Tadesse, Amanuel F. & Vincent, Nishani Edirisinghe, 2021. "The impact of CIO characteristics on data breaches," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 43(C).
    9. Galaz, Victor & Centeno, Miguel A. & Callahan, Peter W. & Causevic, Amar & Patterson, Thayer & Brass, Irina & Baum, Seth & Farber, Darryl & Fischer, Joern & Garcia, David & McPhearson, Timon & Jimenez, 2021. "Artificial intelligence, systemic risks, and sustainability," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    10. Eling, Martin & Wirfs, Jan, 2019. "What are the actual costs of cyber risk events?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 272(3), pages 1109-1119.
    11. Elina Haapamäki & Jukka Sihvonen, 2019. "Cybersecurity in accounting research," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 34(7), pages 808-834, July.
    12. Li, Ling & He, Wu & Xu, Li & Ash, Ivan & Anwar, Mohd & Yuan, Xiaohong, 2019. "Investigating the impact of cybersecurity policy awareness on employees’ cybersecurity behavior," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 13-24.
    13. repec:eme:maj000:maj-09-2018-2004 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Camélia Radu & Nadia Smaili, 2022. "Correction to: Board Gender Diversity and Corporate Response to Cyber Risk: Evidence from Cybersecurity Related Disclosure," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 177(2), pages 375-375, May.
    15. Viberg Johansson, Jennifer & Shah, Nisha & Haraldsdóttir, Eik & Bentzen, Heidi Beate & Coy, Sarah & Kaye, Jane & Mascalzoni, Deborah & Veldwijk, Jorien, 2021. "Governance mechanisms for sharing of health data: An approach towards selecting attributes for complex discrete choice experiment studies," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    16. Tadeusz Sawik, 2022. "A linear model for optimal cybersecurity investment in Industry 4.0 supply chains," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 60(4), pages 1368-1385, February.
    17. Masoud, Najeb & Al-Utaibi, Ghassan, 2022. "The determinants of cybersecurity risk disclosure in firms’ financial reporting: Empirical evidence," Research in Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(2), pages 131-140.
    18. Rajan, Rishabh & Rana, Nripendra P. & Parameswar, Nakul & Dhir, Sanjay & Sushil, & Dwivedi, Yogesh K., 2021. "Developing a modified total interpretive structural model (M-TISM) for organizational strategic cybersecurity management," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    19. Li, He & No, Won Gyun & Wang, Tawei, 2018. "SEC's cybersecurity disclosure guidance and disclosed cybersecurity risk factors," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 40-55.
    20. Slapničar, Sergeja & Vuko, Tina & Čular, Marko & Drašček, Matej, 2022. "Effectiveness of cybersecurity audit," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 44(C).
    21. Iyer, Subramanian R. & Simkins, Betty J. & Wang, Heng, 2020. "Cyberattacks and impact on bond valuation," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 33(C).
    22. Kamiya, Shinichi & Kang, Jun-Koo & Kim, Jungmin & Milidonis, Andreas & Stulz, René M., 2021. "Risk management, firm reputation, and the impact of successful cyberattacks on target firms," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 139(3), pages 719-749.
    23. Ortwin Renn, 2021. "New challenges for risk analysis: systemic risks," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(1), pages 127-133, January.
    24. Cheryl, Barr-Kumarakulasinghe & Ng, Boon-Kwee & Wong, Chan-Yuan, 2021. "Governing the progress of internet-of-things: Ambivalence in the quest of technology exploitation and user rights protection," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maryam Firoozi & Sana Mohsni, 2023. "Cybersecurity disclosure in the banking industry: a comparative study," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 20(4), pages 451-477, December.
    2. Kaur, Harpreet & Gupta, Mahima & Singh, Surya Prakash, 2024. "Integrated model to optimize supplier selection and investments for cyber resilience in digital supply chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    3. Slapničar, Sergeja & Axelsen, Micheal & Bongiovanni, Ivano & Stockdale, David, 2023. "A pathway model to five lines of accountability in cybersecurity governance," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    4. Zhang, Yimei & Smith, Thomas, 2023. "The impact of customer firm data breaches on the audit fees of their suppliers," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    5. Wang, Jimin & Ho, Choy Yeing (Chloe) & Shan, Yuan George, 2024. "Does cybersecurity risk stifle corporate innovation activities?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    6. Martin Eling & Michael McShane & Trung Nguyen, 2021. "Cyber risk management: History and future research directions," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 24(1), pages 93-125, March.
    7. Dalia Hussein Elsayed & Tariq H. Ismail & Eman Adel Ahmed, 2024. "The impact of cybersecurity disclosure on banks’ performance: the moderating role of corporate governance in the MENA region," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-15, December.
    8. Chaitanya Joshi & Jinming Yang & Sergeja Slapnicar & Ryan K L Ko, 2024. "Contrasting the optimal resource allocation to cybersecurity and cyber insurance using prospect theory versus expected utility theory," Papers 2411.18838, arXiv.org.
    9. Martin Boyer & Martin Eling, 2023. "New advances on cyber risk and cyber insurance," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 48(2), pages 267-274, April.
    10. Francisco Isaí Morales-Sáenz & José Melchor Medina-Quintero & Miguel Reyna-Castillo, 2024. "Beyond Data Protection: Exploring the Convergence between Cybersecurity and Sustainable Development in Business," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-32, July.
    11. Daniel Zängerle & Dirk Schiereck, 2023. "Modelling and predicting enterprise-level cyber risks in the context of sparse data availability," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 48(2), pages 434-462, April.
    12. Marie Dutordoir & Frederiek Schoubben & Kristof Struyfs & Wouter Torsin, 2024. "Environmental pressure and board gender diversity: Evidence from the European Union Emission Trading System," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(5), pages 3911-3935, July.
    13. Md. Hamid Uddin & Md. Hakim Ali & Mohammad Kabir Hassan, 2020. "Cybersecurity hazards and financial system vulnerability: a synthesis of literature," Risk Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(4), pages 239-309, December.
    14. Ahmed, Mohamed Shaker & Elnahass, Marwa, 2024. "Being famous matters: Evidence from cash flow volatility," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    15. Sylvie Héroux & Anne Fortin, 2024. "Board of directors’ attributes and aspects of cybersecurity disclosure," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 28(2), pages 359-404, June.
    16. Wing Fung Chong & Runhuan Feng & Hins Hu & Linfeng Zhang, 2022. "Cyber Risk Assessment for Capital Management," Papers 2205.08435, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2025.
    17. Dongliang Yuan & Duo Shang & Xinmei Wu, 2024. "Board diversity and stock price crash risk: exacerbate or mitigate," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-11, December.
    18. Tironi, Martín & Rivera Lisboa, Diego Ignacio, 2023. "Artificial intelligence in the new forms of environmental governance in the Chilean State: Towards an eco-algorithmic governance," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    19. Pavel V. Shevchenko & Jiwook Jang & Matteo Malavasi & Gareth W. Peters & Georgy Sofronov & Stefan Truck, 2022. "The Nature of Losses from Cyber-Related Events: Risk Categories and Business Sectors," Papers 2202.10189, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2022.
    20. Wilson, Christopher & van der Velden, Maja, 2022. "Sustainable AI: An integrated model to guide public sector decision-making," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:74:y:2023:i:c:s0160791x23001148. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.