IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i8p2157-d535057.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Data-Driven Evaluation of Secondary- and Tertiary-Reserve Needs with High Renewables Penetration: The Italian Case

Author

Listed:
  • Filippo Bovera

    (Dipartimento di Energia, Politecnico di Milano, Via Lambruschini 4, I-20133 Milan, Italy)

  • Giuliano Rancilio

    (Dipartimento di Energia, Politecnico di Milano, Via Lambruschini 4, I-20133 Milan, Italy)

  • Davide Falabretti

    (Dipartimento di Energia, Politecnico di Milano, Via Lambruschini 4, I-20133 Milan, Italy)

  • Marco Merlo

    (Dipartimento di Energia, Politecnico di Milano, Via Lambruschini 4, I-20133 Milan, Italy)

Abstract

The diffusion of nonprogrammable power plants, together with the decommissioning of conventional, rotating generators, is increasing the need for flexible resources to always ensure the safe and secure operation of the European electric-power system. Beyond technological advances, policy aspects also play a fundamental role in the opening of electricity markets to new players; in this regard, System Operations Guideline EU 2017/1485 and Italian Regulatory Authority documents require the Italian transmission-system operator (TSO; Terna) to publish all exploited algorithms and methodologies for the management of market balancing. In this context, the present paper develops and presents a data-driven methodology to estimate secondary and tertiary reserve needs; a numerical real-life case study, focused on the North Italy geographical zone, is presented. Data for 2017, 2018, and 2019 on electricity consumption and production (forecasted and actual) were gathered. Following the European TSOs Organization (ENTSO-E) and the Italian TSO (Terna) prescriptions, methodology for the calculation of reserve needs was developed. Results are presented under graphical form and refer, among others, to spinning and nonspinning reserve duration curves, forecast error contribution to reserve calculation, and samples considered for analysis. While a comparison with available market observations is not very helpful, results suggest that the developed methodology could be useful for the evaluation of reserve needs in different control areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Filippo Bovera & Giuliano Rancilio & Davide Falabretti & Marco Merlo, 2021. "Data-Driven Evaluation of Secondary- and Tertiary-Reserve Needs with High Renewables Penetration: The Italian Case," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-24, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:8:p:2157-:d:535057
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/8/2157/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/8/2157/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lion Hirth & Inka Ziegenhagen, 2013. "Control Power and Variable Renewables A Glimpse at German Data," Working Papers 2013.46, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    2. Mariano G. Ippolito & Rossano Musca & Gaetano Zizzo, 2021. "Analysis and Simulations of the Primary Frequency Control during a System Split in Continental Europe Power System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-22, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rancilio, G. & Rossi, A. & Falabretti, D. & Galliani, A. & Merlo, M., 2022. "Ancillary services markets in europe: Evolution and regulatory trade-offs," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guerra, K. & Haro, P. & Gutiérrez, R.E. & Gómez-Barea, A., 2022. "Facing the high share of variable renewable energy in the power system: Flexibility and stability requirements," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 310(C).
    2. Hirth, Lion & Ueckerdt, Falko, 2013. "Redistribution effects of energy and climate policy: The electricity market," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 934-947.
    3. Batalla-Bejerano, Joan & Costa-Campi, Maria Teresa & Trujillo-Baute, Elisa, 2016. "Collateral effects of liberalisation: Metering, losses, load profiles and cost settlement in Spain’s electricity system," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 421-431.
    4. de Jong, Jacques & Hassel, Arndt & Egenhofer, Christian & Jansen, Jaap & Xu, Zheng, 2017. "Improving the Market for Flexibility in the Electricity Sector," CEPS Papers 13093, Centre for European Policy Studies.
    5. Florian Kuhnlenz & Pedro H. J. Nardelli, 2016. "Agent-based Model for Spot and Balancing Electricity Markets," Papers 1612.04512, arXiv.org.
    6. Brijs, Tom & De Vos, Kristof & De Jonghe, Cedric & Belmans, Ronnie, 2015. "Statistical analysis of negative prices in European balancing markets," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 53-60.
    7. Batalla-Bejerano, Joan & Trujillo-Baute, Elisa, 2016. "Impacts of intermittent renewable generation on electricity system costs," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 411-420.
    8. Malandra, F. & Kizilkale, A.C. & Sirois, F. & Sansò, B. & Anjos, M.F. & Bernier, M. & Gendreau, M. & Malhamé, R.P., 2020. "Smart Distributed Energy Storage Controller (smartDESC)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    9. Koliou, Elta & Eid, Cherrelle & Chaves-Ávila, José Pablo & Hakvoort, Rudi A., 2014. "Demand response in liberalized electricity markets: Analysis of aggregated load participation in the German balancing mechanism," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 245-254.
    10. Strunz, Sebastian, 2014. "The German energy transition as a regime shift," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 150-158.
    11. Josip Tosic & Srdjan Skok & Ljupko Teklic & Mislav Balkovic, 2022. "Resilience Neural-Network-Based Methodology Applied on Optimized Transmission Systems Restoration," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-16, June.
    12. Casimir Lorenz & Clemens Gerbaulet, 2014. "New Cross-Border Electricity Balancing Arrangements in Europe," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1400, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    13. Florian Kuhnlenz & Pedro H. J. Nardelli & Santtu Karhinen & Rauli Svento, 2017. "Implementing Flexible Demand: Real-time Price vs. Market Integration," Papers 1709.02667, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2018.
    14. Kondziella, Hendrik & Bruckner, Thomas, 2016. "Flexibility requirements of renewable energy based electricity systems – a review of research results and methodologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 10-22.
    15. Rossano Musca & Francisco Gonzalez-Longatt & Cesar A. Gallego Sánchez, 2022. "Power System Oscillations with Different Prevalence of Grid-Following and Grid-Forming Converters," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-19, June.
    16. Böttger, Diana & Götz, Mario & Theofilidi, Myrto & Bruckner, Thomas, 2015. "Control power provision with power-to-heat plants in systems with high shares of renewable energy sources – An illustrative analysis for Germany based on the use of electric boilers in district heatin," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 157-167.
    17. Joan Batalla-Bejerano & Elisa Trujillo-Baute, 2015. "Analysing the sensitivity of electricity system operational costs to deviations in supply and demand," Working Papers 2015/8, Institut d'Economia de Barcelona (IEB).
    18. Ashish Shrestha & Francisco Gonzalez-Longatt, 2021. "Frequency Stability Issues and Research Opportunities in Converter Dominated Power System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-28, July.
    19. Xing Luo & Jihong Wang & Jacek D. Wojcik & Jianguo Wang & Decai Li & Mihai Draganescu & Yaowang Li & Shihong Miao, 2018. "Review of Voltage and Frequency Grid Code Specifications for Electrical Energy Storage Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-26, April.
    20. Schmidt, Johannes & Eisel, Matthias & Kolbe, Lutz M., 2014. "Assessing the potential of different charging strategies for electric vehicle fleets in closed transport systems," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 179-189.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:8:p:2157-:d:535057. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.