IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i7p1966-d529005.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Business and Energy Efficiency in the Age of Industry 4.0: The Hulten, Broweus and Van Dijk Sensory Marketing Model Applied to Spanish Textile Stores during the COVID-19 Crisis

Author

Listed:
  • Gloria Jiménez-Marín

    (Audiovisual and Advertising Department, Faculty of Communication, University of Seville, 41012 Seville, Spain)

  • Rodrigo Elías Zambrano

    (Audiovisual and Advertising Department, Faculty of Communication, University of Seville, 41012 Seville, Spain)

  • Araceli Galiano-Coronil

    (Marketing and Communication Department, and INDESS, University of Cádiz, 11405 Jerez de la Frontera, Spain)

  • Rafael Ravina-Ripoll

    (Business Organization Department and INDESS, University of Cádiz, 11405 Jerez de la Frontera, Spain)

Abstract

Strategic and tactical factors come into play in shop competitiveness where, in addition to the products sold, other marketing mix variables must also be considered. There are also subjective factors, such as perceptions through the senses. This became even more important when, as a result of the COVID-19 crisis and the forced closure of certain establishments with physical sales, it was necessary to increase profitability and efficiency. The aim of this study was to determine the exact role of sensory marketing in shop efficiency and profitability, based on the guiding principles of technology, innovation, and respect for the environment. We conducted an exploratory and experimental study consisting of the creation of a sensory strategy through the adaptation of the Hulten, Broweus and Van Dijk model on a specific establishment in the current era of Industry 4.0. The results indicate an increase in sales as well as customer satisfaction and happiness after implementing the relevant strategies. The conclusions show that this model is valid and reliable for physical retail establishments, and that these business strategies can significantly contribute to the optimisation of energy resources.

Suggested Citation

  • Gloria Jiménez-Marín & Rodrigo Elías Zambrano & Araceli Galiano-Coronil & Rafael Ravina-Ripoll, 2021. "Business and Energy Efficiency in the Age of Industry 4.0: The Hulten, Broweus and Van Dijk Sensory Marketing Model Applied to Spanish Textile Stores during the COVID-19 Crisis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-10, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:7:p:1966-:d:529005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/7/1966/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/7/1966/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter Warren, 2017. "The Potential of Smart Technologies and Micro-Generation in UK SMEs," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-20, July.
    2. Leonidas Bourikas & Stephanie Gauthier & Nicholas Khor Song En & Peiyao Xiong, 2021. "Effect of Thermal, Acoustic and Air Quality Perception Interactions on the Comfort and Satisfaction of People in Office Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-18, January.
    3. Vasja Roblek & Maja Meško & Alojz Krapež, 2016. "A Complex View of Industry 4.0," SAGE Open, , vol. 6(2), pages 21582440166, June.
    4. Karim Errajaa & Bruno Daucé & Patrick Legoherel, 2020. "Consumer reactions to olfactory congruence with brand image," Post-Print hal-02395979, HAL.
    5. Vladia Borissova, 2021. "Digital Transformation for Digital Competitiveness at a Micro Level," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 1, pages 89-106.
    6. Jaffe, Adam B. & Newell, Richard G. & Stavins, Robert N., 2005. "A tale of two market failures: Technology and environmental policy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(2-3), pages 164-174, August.
    7. Weking, Jörg & Stöcker, Maria & Kowalkiewicz, Marek & Böhm, Markus & Krcmar, Helmut, 2020. "Leveraging industry 4.0 – A business model pattern framework," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    8. António C. Moreira & Nuno Fortes & Ramiro Santiago, 2017. "Influence of sensory stimuli on brand experience, brand equity and purchase intention," Journal of Business Economics and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(1), pages 68-83, January.
    9. Francisco I. Vega-Gómez & Francisco J. Miranda-Gonzalez & Jesús Pérez Mayo & Óscar Rodrigo González-López & Laura Pascual-Nebreda, 2020. "The Scent of Art. Perception, Evaluation, and Behaviour in a Museum in Response to Olfactory Marketing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-15, February.
    10. Xiaolong Liu & Chang-Seok Kim & Keum-Shik Hong, 2018. "An fNIRS-based investigation of visual merchandising displays for fashion stores," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(12), pages 1-19, December.
    11. Ha-Won Jang & Soo-Bum Lee, 2019. "Applying Effective Sensory Marketing to Sustainable Coffee Shop Business Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-17, November.
    12. Errajaa, Karim & Daucé, Bruno & Legohérel, Patrick, 2020. "Consumer reactions to olfactory congruence with brand image," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    13. María-José Foncubierta-Rodríguez & Rafael Ravina-Ripoll & José Antonio López-Sánchez, 2021. "Generational Portrait of Spanish Society in the Face of Climate Change. A Question to Consider for the Green Economy under the Well-Being Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-14, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Konstantinos Salonitis, 2023. "Manufacturing Energy Efficiency and Industry 4.0," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-4, February.
    2. Norbert Bajkó & Zsolt Fülöp & Kinga Nagyné Pércsi, 2022. "Changes in the Innovation- and Marketing-Habits of Family SMEs in the Foodstuffs Industry, Caused by the Coronavirus Pandemic in Hungary," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-17, March.
    3. Carmen Quiles‐Soler & Alba‐María Martínez‐Sala & Juan Monserrat‐Gauchi, 2023. "Fashion industry's environmental policy: Social media and corporate website as vehicles for communicating corporate social responsibility," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(1), pages 180-191, January.
    4. Isabel Palomo-Domínguez & Rodrigo Elías-Zambrano & Víctor Álvarez-Rodríguez, 2023. "Gen Z’s Motivations towards Sustainable Fashion and Eco-Friendly Brand Attributes: The Case of Vinted," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-23, May.
    5. Araceli Galiano-Coronil & Marina Yong Alcedo-Velázquez & Sofía Blanco-Moreno & Luis Bayardo Tobar Pesántez, 2024. "Comparison and positioning of NGOs aimed at children from the perspective of social marketing on Twitter," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Souiden, Nizar & Amara, Nabil & Chaouali, Walid, 2020. "Optimal image mix cues and their impacts on consumers’ purchase intention," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    2. Laurent Busca & Julien Grobert & Cyrielle Vellera, 2021. "Effect of congruent scent diffusion on individual creative fluidity: Mental imagery instruction and iconic stimulus as possible moderators," Post-Print hal-03256558, HAL.
    3. Li, Menglin & Jin, Yufang & Zhang, Jurui & Liu, Raymond, 2022. "Does shape in backgrounds matter? Effects of Shape–Taste congruence on product evaluations," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    4. Jun, Yesel & Lee, Hyunju, 2022. "A sound brand identity design: The interplay between sound symbolism and typography on brand attitude and memory," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    5. Wen-Shin Huang & Cheng-Jhen Lee & Han-Shen Chen, 2022. "The Influence of Corporate Social Responsibility on Consumer Purchase Intention toward Environmentally Friendly Sneakers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-17, November.
    6. Fabio Antoniou & Roland Strausz, 2014. "The Effectiveness of Taxation and Feed-in Tariffs," CESifo Working Paper Series 4788, CESifo.
    7. Bosetti, Valentina & Carraro, Carlo & Duval, Romain & Tavoni, Massimo, 2011. "What should we expect from innovation? A model-based assessment of the environmental and mitigation cost implications of climate-related R&D," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 1313-1320.
    8. Feser, Daniel & Runst, Petrik, 2015. "Energy efficiency consultants as change agents? Examining the reasons for EECs’ limited success," ifh Working Papers 1 (2015), Volkswirtschaftliches Institut für Mittelstand und Handwerk an der Universität Göttingen (ifh).
    9. Patrice Bougette & Christophe Charlier, 2019. "Subsidies and Countervailing Measures in the EU Biofuel Industry: A Welfare Analysis," Post-Print halshs-02306022, HAL.
    10. Hille, Erik & Althammer, Wilhelm & Diederich, Henning, 2020. "Environmental regulation and innovation in renewable energy technologies: Does the policy instrument matter?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    11. Vitaliy Roud & Thomas Wolfgang Thurner, 2018. "The Influence of State‐Ownership on Eco‐Innovations in Russian Manufacturing Firms," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 22(5), pages 1213-1227, October.
    12. Emanuele Massetti & Lea Nicita, 2010. "The Optimal Climate Policy Portfolio when Knowledge Spills across Sectors," CESifo Working Paper Series 2988, CESifo.
    13. Giancarlo Giudici & Massimiliano Guerini & Cristina Rossi-Lamastra, 2019. "The creation of cleantech startups at the local level: the role of knowledge availability and environmental awareness," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 52(4), pages 815-830, April.
    14. Christoph P. Kiefer & Pablo Del Río González & Javier Carrillo‐Hermosilla, 2019. "Drivers and barriers of eco‐innovation types for sustainable transitions: A quantitative perspective," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 155-172, January.
    15. Söderholm, Patrik & Pettersson, Maria, 2011. "Offshore wind power policy and planning in Sweden," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 518-525, February.
    16. Rosin Frédéric & Magnani Florian & Joblot Laurent & Pascal Forget & Robert Pellerin & Lamour Samir, 2022. "Lean 4.0: typology of scenarios and case studies to characterize Industry 4.0 autonomy model [Lean 4.0 : typologie de scénarios d'études visant à caractériser les modèles d'autonomie 4.0]," Post-Print hal-03799489, HAL.
    17. Francesco Nicolli & Francesco Vona & Lionel Nesta, 2012. "Determinants of Renewable Energy Innovation: Environmental Policies vs. Market Regulation," Working Papers 201204, University of Ferrara, Department of Economics.
    18. Xiding Chen & Qinghua Huang & Weilun Huang & Xue Li, 2018. "The Impact of Sustainable Development Technology on a Small Economy—The Case of Energy-Saving Technology," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-11, February.
    19. Bhardwaj, Chandan & Axsen, Jonn & Kern, Florian & McCollum, David, 2020. "Why have multiple climate policies for light-duty vehicles? Policy mix rationales, interactions and research gaps," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 309-326.
    20. Squires, Dale & Vestergaard, Niels, 2013. "Technical change in fisheries," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 286-292.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:7:p:1966-:d:529005. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.