IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-03799489.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Lean 4.0: typology of scenarios and case studies to characterize Industry 4.0 autonomy model
[Lean 4.0 : typologie de scénarios d'études visant à caractériser les modèles d'autonomie 4.0]

Author

Listed:
  • Rosin Frédéric

    (LAMIH - Laboratoire d'Automatique, de Mécanique et d'Informatique industrielles et Humaines - UMR 8201 - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - UPHF - Université Polytechnique Hauts-de-France - INSA Hauts-De-France - INSA Institut National des Sciences Appliquées Hauts-de-France - INSA - Institut National des Sciences Appliquées)

  • Magnani Florian

    (CERGAM - Centre d'Études et de Recherche en Gestion d'Aix-Marseille - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - UTLN - Université de Toulon, ECM - École Centrale de Marseille)

  • Joblot Laurent

    (LISPEN - Laboratoire d’Ingénierie des Systèmes Physiques et Numériques - Arts et Métiers Sciences et Technologies - HESAM - HESAM Université - Communauté d'universités et d'établissements Hautes écoles Sorbonne Arts et métiers université)

  • Pascal Forget

    (UQTR - University of Quebec at Trois-Rivieres)

  • Robert Pellerin

    (EPM - École Polytechnique de Montréal)

  • Lamour Samir

    (LAMIH - Laboratoire d'Automatique, de Mécanique et d'Informatique industrielles et Humaines - UMR 8201 - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - UPHF - Université Polytechnique Hauts-de-France - INSA Hauts-De-France - INSA Institut National des Sciences Appliquées Hauts-de-France - INSA - Institut National des Sciences Appliquées)

Abstract

Industry 4.0 is leading to rethink how operational decisions are made within companies. In particular, it raises the question of the evolution of employee involvement and autonomy in operational decision-making in a Lean 4.0 context. Dealing with such issues within companies presents high stakes but also involves many risks and difficulties. Therefore, it is necessary to test these new Industry 4.0 autonomy models within our Evolutive Learning Factories by developing a suitable experimental protocol. This article proposes a typology of scenarios and case studies that will serve as a basis for future experiments to study these issues in a standardized work context. This first study framework confirmed that the decisions induced by all the problems and opportunities encountered at the operational level are numerous and varied. This research work is a first step and opens up much broader research perspectives on the contribution of Industry 4.0 technologies in implementing new models of autonomy at work.

Suggested Citation

  • Rosin Frédéric & Magnani Florian & Joblot Laurent & Pascal Forget & Robert Pellerin & Lamour Samir, 2022. "Lean 4.0: typology of scenarios and case studies to characterize Industry 4.0 autonomy model [Lean 4.0 : typologie de scénarios d'études visant à caractériser les modèles d'autonomie 4.0]," Post-Print hal-03799489, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03799489
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-03799489v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-03799489v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vasja Roblek & Maja Meško & Alojz Krapež, 2016. "A Complex View of Industry 4.0," SAGE Open, , vol. 6(2), pages 21582440166, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Siqing Shan & Xin Wen & Yigang Wei & Zijin Wang & Yong Chen, 2020. "Intelligent manufacturing in industry 4.0: A case study of Sany heavy industry," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(4), pages 679-690, July.
    2. Gergely Marcell Honti & Janos Abonyi, 2019. "A Review of Semantic Sensor Technologies in Internet of Things Architectures," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-21, June.
    3. Yüksel, Hilmi, 2020. "An empirical evaluation of industry 4.0 applications of companies in Turkey: The case of a developing country," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    4. Emanuele Gabriel Margherita & Ilenia Bua, 2021. "The Role of Human Resource Practices for the Development of Operator 4.0 in Industry 4.0 Organisations: A Literature Review and a Research Agenda," Businesses, MDPI, vol. 1(1), pages 1-16, April.
    5. Asterios Stroumpoulis & Evangelia Kopanaki & George Karaganis, 2021. "Examining the Relationship between Information Systems, Sustainable SCM, and Competitive Advantage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-21, October.
    6. Calış Duman, Meral & Akdemir, Bunyamin, 2021. "A study to determine the effects of industry 4.0 technology components on organizational performance," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    7. Silveira Gontijo, Tiago & Motta Alves, Fabiana Alexandra, 2018. "A Bibliometric Study On Industry 4.0," MPRA Paper 115925, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 23 Dec 2019.
    8. Zimei Liu & Kefan Xie & Ling Li & Yong Chen, 2020. "A paradigm of safety management in Industry 4.0," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(4), pages 632-645, July.
    9. Canbay, Kamile & Akman, Gulsen, 2023. "Investigating changes of total quality management principles in the context of Industry 4.0: Viewpoint from an emerging economy," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    10. Szabó, Zs. Roland & Horváth, Dóra & Hortoványi, Lilla, 2019. "Hálózati tanulás az ipar 4.0 korában [Network learning in the 4.0 era of industry]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(1), pages 72-94.
    11. Mansoor Ahmed Soomro & Mohd Hizam-Hanafiah & Nor Liza Abdullah & Mohd Helmi Ali & Muhammad Shahar Jusoh, 2021. "Industry 4.0 Readiness of Technology Companies: A Pilot Study from Malaysia," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-18, May.
    12. Ryszard Borowiecki & Zbigniew Olesinski & Agnieszka Rzepka & Katarzyna Hys, 2021. "Development of Teal Organisations in Economy 4.0: An Empirical Research," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 117-129.
    13. Anna Kwiotkowska & Magdalena Gębczyńska, 2022. "Job Satisfaction and Work Characteristics Combinations in Industry 4.0 Environment—Insight from the Polish SMEs in the Post–Pandemic Era," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-18, October.
    14. Kim, Hakpyeong & Choi, Heeju & Kang, Hyuna & An, Jongbaek & Yeom, Seungkeun & Hong, Taehoon, 2021. "A systematic review of the smart energy conservation system: From smart homes to sustainable smart cities," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    15. Bruno Garcia Oliveira & Lara Bartocci Liboni & Luciana Oranges Cezarino & Nelson Oliveira Stefanelli & Irene Kazumi Miura, 2020. "Industry 4.0 in systems thinking: From a narrow to a broad spectrum," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(4), pages 593-606, July.
    16. Abdullah Tirgil & Derya Fındık, 2023. "How Does Awareness Toward the Industry 4.0 Applications Affect Firms' Financial and Innovation Performance?," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 14(2), pages 1900-1922, June.
    17. Zhang Yu & Syed Abdul Rehman Khan & Muhammad Umar, 2022. "Circular economy practices and industry 4.0 technologies: A strategic move of automobile industry," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 796-809, March.
    18. Agnieszka Rzepka & Ryszard Borowiecki & Radosław Miskiewicz & Zbigniew Olesinski, 2021. "Changes in Management During Transformation of Power Industry," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 1149-1162.
    19. Črešnar Rok & Jevšenak Senta, 2019. "The Millennials’ Effect: How Can Their Personal Values Shape the Future Business Environment of Industry 4.0?," Naše gospodarstvo/Our economy, Sciendo, vol. 65(1), pages 57-65, March.
    20. Hong Jiang & Shuyu Sun & Hongtao Xu & Shukuan Zhao & Yong Chen, 2020. "Enterprises' network structure and their technology standardization capability in Industry 4.0," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(4), pages 749-765, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03799489. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.