IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i7p1904-d526732.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

In Situ Evaluation of the U-Value of a Window Using the Infrared Method

Author

Listed:
  • Seyoung Park

    (Energy ICT Convergence Laboratory, Korea Institute of Energy Research, Daejeon 34101, Korea
    Department of Building and Plant Engineering, Hanbat National University, Daejeon 34158, Korea)

  • Seo Hoon Kim

    (Energy ICT Convergence Laboratory, Korea Institute of Energy Research, Daejeon 34101, Korea)

  • Hakgeun Jeong

    (Energy ICT Convergence Laboratory, Korea Institute of Energy Research, Daejeon 34101, Korea)

  • Sung Lok Do

    (Department of Building and Plant Engineering, Hanbat National University, Daejeon 34158, Korea
    These authors contributed equally to this work as co-corresponding authors.)

  • Jonghun Kim

    (Energy ICT Convergence Laboratory, Korea Institute of Energy Research, Daejeon 34101, Korea
    These authors contributed equally to this work as co-corresponding authors.)

Abstract

The amount of heat lost through the envelope of a building is one of the most important variables that affects the energy performance evaluation of a house. In addition, it is especially important to estimate and accurately diagnose the amount of heat produced by windows. In Korea, windows’ U-values reflect a building’s initial design values and thermal characteristics that determine the thermal performance of an existing building, and is a factor that can overestimate the energy performance of a building. Therefore, there is a need for a field measurement method that can accurately measure the total U-value of windows in an existing house. This study provides a method of quantitatively measuring the total U-value of windows using the infrared (IR) method in ISO 9869-2. As a result of measuring the U-value using the infrared (IR) method, the Korean Standard (KS F 2278) for window performance test result values and the root mean square error (cvRMSE) for the U-value measurements using the IR method showed a high accuracy of about 3.29%. In addition, we confirmed that the IR method is an effective (cvRMSE about 7% improvement) method that can measure the comparison result faster than the heat flow meter (HFM) method, which is a conventional thermal performance measurement method.

Suggested Citation

  • Seyoung Park & Seo Hoon Kim & Hakgeun Jeong & Sung Lok Do & Jonghun Kim, 2021. "In Situ Evaluation of the U-Value of a Window Using the Infrared Method," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-14, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:7:p:1904-:d:526732
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/7/1904/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/7/1904/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ballarini, Ilaria & Corgnati, Stefano Paolo & Corrado, Vincenzo, 2014. "Use of reference buildings to assess the energy saving potentials of the residential building stock: The experience of TABULA project," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 273-284.
    2. Giuliano Dall'O' & Luca Sarto & Angela Panza, 2013. "Infrared Screening of Residential Buildings for Energy Audit Purposes: Results of a Field Test," Energies, MDPI, vol. 6(8), pages 1-20, July.
    3. Albatici, Rossano & Tonelli, Arnaldo M. & Chiogna, Michela, 2015. "A comprehensive experimental approach for the validation of quantitative infrared thermography in the evaluation of building thermal transmittance," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 218-228.
    4. Seo-Hoon Kim & Jong-Hun Kim & Hak-Geun Jeong & Kyoo-Dong Song, 2018. "Reliability Field Test of the Air–Surface Temperature Ratio Method for In Situ Measurement of U-Values," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-15, March.
    5. Doo Sung Choi & Myeong Jin Ko, 2017. "Comparison of Various Analysis Methods Based on Heat Flowmeters and Infrared Thermography Measurements for the Evaluation of the In Situ Thermal Transmittance of Opaque Exterior Walls," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-22, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Iole Nardi & Elena Lucchi, 2023. "In Situ Thermal Transmittance Assessment of the Building Envelope: Practical Advice and Outlooks for Standard and Innovative Procedures," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-31, April.
    2. Martin, Miguel & Chong, Adrian & Biljecki, Filip & Miller, Clayton, 2022. "Infrared thermography in the built environment: A multi-scale review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bienvenido-Huertas, David & Moyano, Juan & Rodríguez-Jiménez, Carlos E. & Marín, David, 2019. "Applying an artificial neural network to assess thermal transmittance in walls by means of the thermometric method," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233, pages 1-14.
    2. Bienvenido-Huertas, David & Moyano, Juan & Marín, David & Fresco-Contreras, Rafael, 2019. "Review of in situ methods for assessing the thermal transmittance of walls," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 356-371.
    3. Seo-Hoon Kim & Jung-Hun Lee & Jong-Hun Kim & Seung-Hwan Yoo & Hak-Geun Jeong, 2018. "The Feasibility of Improving the Accuracy of In Situ Measurements in the Air-Surface Temperature Ratio Method," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-18, July.
    4. David Bienvenido-Huertas, 2020. "Assessing the Environmental Impact of Thermal Transmittance Tests Performed in Façades of Existing Buildings: The Case of Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-18, August.
    5. Martin, Miguel & Chong, Adrian & Biljecki, Filip & Miller, Clayton, 2022. "Infrared thermography in the built environment: A multi-scale review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    6. Doo Sung Choi & Myeong Jin Ko, 2019. "Analysis of Convergence Characteristics of Average Method Regulated by ISO 9869-1 for Evaluating In Situ Thermal Resistance and Thermal Transmittance of Opaque Exterior Walls," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-18, May.
    7. Iole Nardi & Elena Lucchi, 2023. "In Situ Thermal Transmittance Assessment of the Building Envelope: Practical Advice and Outlooks for Standard and Innovative Procedures," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-31, April.
    8. Doo Sung Choi & Myeong Jin Ko, 2017. "Comparison of Various Analysis Methods Based on Heat Flowmeters and Infrared Thermography Measurements for the Evaluation of the In Situ Thermal Transmittance of Opaque Exterior Walls," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-22, July.
    9. O'Grady, Małgorzata & Lechowska, Agnieszka A. & Harte, Annette M., 2017. "Quantification of heat losses through building envelope thermal bridges influenced by wind velocity using the outdoor infrared thermography technique," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 1038-1052.
    10. Marianna Rotilio & Federica Cucchiella & Pierluigi De Berardinis & Vincenzo Stornelli, 2018. "Thermal Transmittance Measurements of the Historical Masonries: Some Case Studies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-18, November.
    11. Seo-Hoon Kim & Jong-Hun Kim & Hak-Geun Jeong & Kyoo-Dong Song, 2018. "Reliability Field Test of the Air–Surface Temperature Ratio Method for In Situ Measurement of U-Values," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-15, March.
    12. Lucchi, Elena, 2018. "Applications of the infrared thermography in the energy audit of buildings: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 3077-3090.
    13. David Bienvenido-Huertas & Roberto Rodríguez-Álvaro & Juan José Moyano & Fernando Rico & David Marín, 2018. "Determining the U -Value of Façades Using the Thermometric Method: Potentials and Limitations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-17, February.
    14. Zoe Mayer & Julia Heuer & Rebekka Volk & Frank Schultmann, 2021. "Aerial Thermographic Image-Based Assessment of Thermal Bridges Using Representative Classifications and Calculations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-43, November.
    15. Rossano Albatici & Alessia Gadotti & Christian Baldessari & Michela Chiogna, 2016. "A Decision Making Tool for a Comprehensive Evaluation of Building Retrofitting Actions at the Regional Scale," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-17, September.
    16. Roberta Pernetti & Riccardo Pinotti & Roberto Lollini, 2021. "Repository of Deep Renovation Packages Based on Industrialized Solutions: Definition and Application," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-18, June.
    17. Becchio, Cristina & Bottero, Marta Carla & Corgnati, Stefano Paolo & Dell’Anna, Federico, 2018. "Decision making for sustainable urban energy planning: an integrated evaluation framework of alternative solutions for a NZED (Net Zero-Energy District) in Turin," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 803-817.
    18. Solène Goy & François Maréchal & Donal Finn, 2020. "Data for Urban Scale Building Energy Modelling: Assessing Impacts and Overcoming Availability Challenges," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-23, August.
    19. Langevin, J. & Reyna, J.L. & Ebrahimigharehbaghi, S. & Sandberg, N. & Fennell, P. & Nägeli, C. & Laverge, J. & Delghust, M. & Mata, É. & Van Hove, M. & Webster, J. & Federico, F. & Jakob, M. & Camaras, 2020. "Developing a common approach for classifying building stock energy models," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    20. Hanan S.S. Ibrahim & Ahmed Z. Khan & Shady Attia & Yehya Serag, 2021. "Classification of Heritage Residential Building Stock and Defining Sustainable Retrofitting Scenarios in Khedivial Cairo," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-26, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:7:p:1904-:d:526732. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.