IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i4p1211-d504438.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Analysis of Repeating Thermal Bridges from Timber Frame Fraction in Closed Panel Timber Frame Walls: A Case Study from Wales, UK

Author

Listed:
  • Francesco Zaccaro

    (The Sustainable & Resilient Built Environment Research Group, Cardiff School of Art and Design, Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff CF5 2YB, UK)

  • John Richard Littlewood

    (The Sustainable & Resilient Built Environment Research Group, Cardiff School of Art and Design, Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff CF5 2YB, UK)

  • Carolyn Hayles

    (The Sustainable & Resilient Built Environment Research Group, Cardiff School of Art and Design, Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff CF5 2YB, UK)

Abstract

Calculating Repeating Thermal Bridges (RTBs) for Timber Frame (TF) closed panels that could occur in Offsite Manufactured (OSM) Modern Methods of Construction (MMC), such as exterior walls for nearly-to-zero operational energy dwellings to be constructed in Wales, United Kingdom (UK) is discussed in this paper. Detailed calculations for linear RTBs due to the TF components are often neglected when evaluating thermal transmittance (known as U-values hereafter). The use of standard TF fractions does not allow the designer to perceive their detrimental impact on RTBs and consequent U-values for exterior walls. With the increase of the thermal performance of exterior walls and as such lower U-values due to ever-tightening Building Regulations, specifically related to the energy use and carbon emissions from the space heating of dwellings, then the impacts of RTBs requires more investigation. By not calculating the potential of linear RTB at the design stage could lead to a performance gap where assumed U-values for exterior walls differ from manufacture to onsite. A TF detail from the Welsh manufacture has been chosen as a case study, to develop and apply a methodology using manufacturing drawings to evaluate TF fraction and their effect on the thermal performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Francesco Zaccaro & John Richard Littlewood & Carolyn Hayles, 2021. "An Analysis of Repeating Thermal Bridges from Timber Frame Fraction in Closed Panel Timber Frame Walls: A Case Study from Wales, UK," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-17, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:4:p:1211-:d:504438
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/4/1211/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/4/1211/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zheng, Xiaofeng & Cooper, Edward & Gillott, Mark & Wood, Christopher, 2020. "A practical review of alternatives to the steady pressurisation method for determining building airtightness," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    2. Gupta, Rajat & Kotopouleas, Alkis, 2018. "Magnitude and extent of building fabric thermal performance gap in UK low energy housing," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 673-686.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rajat Gupta & Matt Gregg, 2021. "Integrated Testing of Building Fabric Thermal Performance for Calibration of Energy Models of Three Low-Energy Dwellings in the UK," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-24, March.
    2. Li, X. & Arbabi, H. & Bennett, G. & Oreszczyn, T. & Densley Tingley, D., 2022. "Net zero by 2050: Investigating carbon-budget compliant retrofit measures for the English housing stock," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    3. Moradi, Amir & Kavgic, Miroslava & Costanzo, Vincenzo & Evola, Gianpiero, 2023. "Impact of typical and actual weather years on the energy simulation of buildings with different construction features and under different climates," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    4. Kheira Anissa Tabet Aoul & Rahma Hagi & Rahma Abdelghani & Monaya Syam & Boshra Akhozheya, 2021. "Building Envelope Thermal Defects in Existing and Under-Construction Housing in the UAE; Infrared Thermography Diagnosis and Qualitative Impacts Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-23, February.
    5. Łukasz Amanowicz & Katarzyna Ratajczak & Edyta Dudkiewicz, 2023. "Recent Advancements in Ventilation Systems Used to Decrease Energy Consumption in Buildings—Literature Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-39, February.
    6. Ling-Chin, J. & Taylor, W. & Davidson, P. & Reay, D. & Nazi, W.I. & Tassou, S. & Roskilly, A.P., 2019. "UK building thermal performance from industrial and governmental perspectives," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C), pages 270-282.
    7. Chanhyung Shim & Goopyo Hong, 2023. "Airtightness Assessment under Several Low-Pressure Differences in Non-Residential Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-13, September.
    8. Ahmad Taki & Anastasiya Zakharanka, 2023. "The Effect of Degradation on Cold Climate Building Energy Performance: A Comparison with Hot Climate Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-38, April.
    9. Ahmad Taki & Anastasiya Zakharanka, 2023. "The Impact of Degradation on a Building’s Energy Performance in Hot-Humid Climates," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-34, January.
    10. Kajavathani Panchalingam & Eziaku Onyeizu Rasheed & James Olabode Bamidele Rotimi, 2024. "Cost-Related Drivers and Barriers of Passivhaus: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-24, July.
    11. Palladino, Domenico, 2023. "Energy performance gap of the Italian residential building stock: Parametric energy simulations for theoretical deviation assessment from standard conditions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 345(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:4:p:1211-:d:504438. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.