IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i21p7367-d672782.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Interpretable Machine Learning Model for Daily Global Solar Radiation Prediction

Author

Listed:
  • Mohamed Chaibi

    (Team of Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency, Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Moulay Ismail, Zitoune, Meknes BP 11201, Morocco)

  • EL Mahjoub Benghoulam

    (Team of Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency, Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Moulay Ismail, Zitoune, Meknes BP 11201, Morocco)

  • Lhoussaine Tarik

    (Water and Environmental Engineering Laboratory, Faculty of Science and Technique, Mining, University of Moulay Ismail, Boutalamine, Errachidia BP 509, Morocco)

  • Mohamed Berrada

    (Laboratory of Mathematical and Computational Modeling, ENSAM, University of Moulay Ismail, Marjane II, Al Mansour, 50000, Meknes BP 15290, Morocco)

  • Abdellah El Hmaidi

    (Laboratory of Water Sciences and Environmental Engineering, Department of Geology, Faculty of Science, University of Moulay Ismail, Zitoune, Meknes BP 11201, Morocco)

Abstract

Machine learning (ML) models are commonly used in solar modeling due to their high predictive accuracy. However, the predictions of these models are difficult to explain and trust. This paper aims to demonstrate the utility of two interpretation techniques to explain and improve the predictions of ML models. We compared first the predictive performance of Light Gradient Boosting (LightGBM) with three benchmark models, including multilayer perceptron (MLP), multiple linear regression (MLR), and support-vector regression (SVR), for estimating the global solar radiation ( H ) in the city of Fez, Morocco. Then, the predictions of the most accurate model were explained by two model-agnostic explanation techniques: permutation feature importance (PFI) and Shapley additive explanations (SHAP). The results indicated that LightGBM (R 2 = 0.9377, RMSE = 0.4827 kWh/m 2 , MAE = 0.3614 kWh/m 2 ) provides similar predictive accuracy as SVR, and outperformed MLP and MLR in the testing stage. Both PFI and SHAP methods showed that extraterrestrial solar radiation ( H 0 ) and sunshine duration fraction ( SF ) are the two most important parameters that affect H estimation. Moreover, the SHAP method established how each feature influences the LightGBM estimations. The predictive accuracy of the LightGBM model was further improved slightly after re-examination of features, where the model combining H 0 , SF , and RH was better than the model with all features.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohamed Chaibi & EL Mahjoub Benghoulam & Lhoussaine Tarik & Mohamed Berrada & Abdellah El Hmaidi, 2021. "An Interpretable Machine Learning Model for Daily Global Solar Radiation Prediction," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-19, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:21:p:7367-:d:672782
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/21/7367/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/21/7367/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mohammadi, Kasra & Shamshirband, Shahaboddin & Kamsin, Amirrudin & Lai, P.C. & Mansor, Zulkefli, 2016. "Identifying the most significant input parameters for predicting global solar radiation using an ANFIS selection procedure," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 423-434.
    2. Rohani, Abbas & Taki, Morteza & Abdollahpour, Masoumeh, 2018. "A novel soft computing model (Gaussian process regression with K-fold cross validation) for daily and monthly solar radiation forecasting (Part: I)," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 411-422.
    3. Hassan, Muhammed A. & Khalil, A. & Kaseb, S. & Kassem, M.A., 2017. "Exploring the potential of tree-based ensemble methods in solar radiation modeling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 897-916.
    4. Wang, Lunche & Kisi, Ozgur & Zounemat-Kermani, Mohammad & Salazar, Germán Ariel & Zhu, Zhongmin & Gong, Wei, 2016. "Solar radiation prediction using different techniques: model evaluation and comparison," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 384-397.
    5. Julián Ascencio-Vásquez & Jakob Bevc & Kristjan Reba & Kristijan Brecl & Marko Jankovec & Marko Topič, 2020. "Advanced PV Performance Modelling Based on Different Levels of Irradiance Data Accuracy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-12, May.
    6. Mekhilef, S. & Saidur, R. & Safari, A., 2011. "A review on solar energy use in industries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(4), pages 1777-1790, May.
    7. Besharat, Fariba & Dehghan, Ali A. & Faghih, Ahmad R., 2013. "Empirical models for estimating global solar radiation: A review and case study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 798-821.
    8. Rizwan, M. & Jamil, Majid & Kirmani, Sheeraz & Kothari, D.P., 2014. "Fuzzy logic based modeling and estimation of global solar energy using meteorological parameters," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 685-691.
    9. Shamshirband, Shahaboddin & Mohammadi, Kasra & Yee, Por Lip & Petković, Dalibor & Mostafaeipour, Ali, 2015. "A comparative evaluation for identifying the suitability of extreme learning machine to predict horizontal global solar radiation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 1031-1042.
    10. Halawa, Edward & GhaffarianHoseini, AmirHosein & Hin Wa Li, Danny, 2014. "Empirical correlations as a means for estimating monthly average daily global radiation: A critical overview," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 149-153.
    11. Ahmad, Muhammad Waseem & Mourshed, Monjur & Rezgui, Yacine, 2018. "Tree-based ensemble methods for predicting PV power generation and their comparison with support vector regression," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 465-474.
    12. Li, Jie & Pan, Lanjia & Suvarna, Manu & Tong, Yen Wah & Wang, Xiaonan, 2020. "Fuel properties of hydrochar and pyrochar: Prediction and exploration with machine learning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    13. Kaba, Kazım & Sarıgül, Mehmet & Avcı, Mutlu & Kandırmaz, H. Mustafa, 2018. "Estimation of daily global solar radiation using deep learning model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 126-135.
    14. Fan, Junliang & Ma, Xin & Wu, Lifeng & Zhang, Fucang & Yu, Xiang & Zeng, Wenzhi, 2019. "Light Gradient Boosting Machine: An efficient soft computing model for estimating daily reference evapotranspiration with local and external meteorological data," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    15. Urraca, R. & Martinez-de-Pison, E. & Sanz-Garcia, A. & Antonanzas, J. & Antonanzas-Torres, F., 2017. "Estimation methods for global solar radiation: Case study evaluation of five different approaches in central Spain," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 1098-1113.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hasna Hissou & Said Benkirane & Azidine Guezzaz & Mourade Azrour & Abderrahim Beni-Hssane, 2023. "A Novel Machine Learning Approach for Solar Radiation Estimation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-21, July.
    2. Hasan Alkahtani & Theyazn H. H. Aldhyani & Saleh Nagi Alsubari, 2023. "Application of Artificial Intelligence Model Solar Radiation Prediction for Renewable Energy Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-21, April.
    3. Jonas Hülsmann & Julia Barbosa & Florian Steinke, 2023. "Local Interpretable Explanations of Energy System Designs," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-17, February.
    4. Song, Zhe & Cao, Sunliang & Yang, Hongxing, 2024. "An interpretable framework for modeling global solar radiation using tree-based ensemble machine learning and Shapley additive explanations methods," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 364(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Olubayo M. Babatunde & Josiah L. Munda & Yskandar Hamam, 2020. "Exploring the Potentials of Artificial Neural Network Trained with Differential Evolution for Estimating Global Solar Radiation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-18, May.
    2. Feng, Yu & Hao, Weiping & Li, Haoru & Cui, Ningbo & Gong, Daozhi & Gao, Lili, 2020. "Machine learning models to quantify and map daily global solar radiation and photovoltaic power," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    3. Guosheng Duan & Lifeng Wu & Fa Liu & Yicheng Wang & Shaofei Wu, 2022. "Improvement in Solar-Radiation Forecasting Based on Evolutionary KNEA Method and Numerical Weather Prediction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-20, June.
    4. Fan, Junliang & Wu, Lifeng & Zhang, Fucang & Cai, Huanjie & Zeng, Wenzhi & Wang, Xiukang & Zou, Haiyang, 2019. "Empirical and machine learning models for predicting daily global solar radiation from sunshine duration: A review and case study in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 186-212.
    5. Bikhtiyar Ameen & Heiko Balzter & Claire Jarvis & James Wheeler, 2019. "Modelling Hourly Global Horizontal Irradiance from Satellite-Derived Datasets and Climate Variables as New Inputs with Artificial Neural Networks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-28, January.
    6. Makade, Rahul G. & Chakrabarti, Siddharth & Jamil, Basharat & Sakhale, C.N., 2020. "Estimation of global solar radiation for the tropical wet climatic region of India: A theory of experimentation approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 2044-2059.
    7. Lu, Yunbo & Wang, Lunche & Zhu, Canming & Zou, Ling & Zhang, Ming & Feng, Lan & Cao, Qian, 2023. "Predicting surface solar radiation using a hybrid radiative Transfer–Machine learning model," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    8. Rohani, Abbas & Taki, Morteza & Abdollahpour, Masoumeh, 2018. "A novel soft computing model (Gaussian process regression with K-fold cross validation) for daily and monthly solar radiation forecasting (Part: I)," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 411-422.
    9. Keshtegar, Behrooz & Mert, Cihan & Kisi, Ozgur, 2018. "Comparison of four heuristic regression techniques in solar radiation modeling: Kriging method vs RSM, MARS and M5 model tree," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 330-341.
    10. Liu, Fa & Wang, Xunming & Sun, Fubao & Wang, Hong, 2022. "Correct and remap solar radiation and photovoltaic power in China based on machine learning models," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 312(C).
    11. Kisi, Ozgur & Heddam, Salim & Yaseen, Zaher Mundher, 2019. "The implementation of univariable scheme-based air temperature for solar radiation prediction: New development of dynamic evolving neural-fuzzy inference system model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 241(C), pages 184-195.
    12. Tan, Daniel & Suvarna, Manu & Shee Tan, Yee & Li, Jie & Wang, Xiaonan, 2021. "A three-step machine learning framework for energy profiling, activity state prediction and production estimation in smart process manufacturing," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 291(C).
    13. Halabi, Laith M. & Mekhilef, Saad & Hossain, Monowar, 2018. "Performance evaluation of hybrid adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system models for predicting monthly global solar radiation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 247-261.
    14. Wu, Wei & Tang, Xiaoping & Lv, Jiake & Yang, Chao & Liu, Hongbin, 2021. "Potential of Bayesian additive regression trees for predicting daily global and diffuse solar radiation in arid and humid areas," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 148-163.
    15. Meenal, R. & Selvakumar, A. Immanuel, 2018. "Assessment of SVM, empirical and ANN based solar radiation prediction models with most influencing input parameters," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 324-343.
    16. Gupta, Priya & Singh, Rhythm, 2023. "Combining simple and less time complex ML models with multivariate empirical mode decomposition to obtain accurate GHI forecast," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PC).
    17. Jha, Sunil Kr. & Bilalovic, Jasmin & Jha, Anju & Patel, Nilesh & Zhang, Han, 2017. "Renewable energy: Present research and future scope of Artificial Intelligence," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 297-317.
    18. Qin, Wenmin & Wang, Lunche & Lin, Aiwen & Zhang, Ming & Xia, Xiangao & Hu, Bo & Niu, Zigeng, 2018. "Comparison of deterministic and data-driven models for solar radiation estimation in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 579-594.
    19. Anagnostopoulos, Argyrios & Sebastia-Saez, Daniel & Campbell, Alasdair N. & Arellano-Garcia, Harvey, 2020. "Finite element modelling of the thermal performance of salinity gradient solar ponds," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    20. Bayrakçı, Hilmi Cenk & Demircan, Cihan & Keçebaş, Ali, 2018. "The development of empirical models for estimating global solar radiation on horizontal surface: A case study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 2771-2782.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:21:p:7367-:d:672782. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.