IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i19p6328-d649617.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bottom-Up Initiatives Undertaken by Local Governments to Support Entrepreneurship

Author

Listed:
  • Niki Derlukiewicz

    (Department of Macroeconomics, Wroclaw University of Economics and Business, 53-345 Wroclaw, Poland)

  • Anna Mempel-Śnieżyk

    (Department of Spatial Economy and Local Government Administration, Wroclaw University of Economics and Business, 54-345 Wroclaw, Poland)

  • Tomasz Pilewicz

    (Business Environment Unit, Institute of Enterprise, SGH Warsaw School of Economics, 02-554 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Małgorzata Godlewska

    (Department of Administrative and Corporate Finance Law, SGH Warsaw School of Economics, 02-554 Warsaw, Poland)

Abstract

The present paper deals with issues related to activities undertaken by local government. The article focuses on the identification and assessment of the significance of local government’s different bottom-up initiatives that support development of local entrepreneurship. The article also indirectly discusses the importance of activities referring to energy efficiency. Through the digitization process and by using digital tools, LGs realize projects, improve local actors’ awareness, and finally achieve new challenges such as a higher proportion of gross final energy consumption being from renewable sources. The aim of the paper is to present the relationship between the LGs’ entrepreneurial activities, which we call bottom-up initiatives, and the local entrepreneurship level, understood as the number of entrepreneurs active on the territory of a LG. This paper presents the results of research carried out on the bottom-up initiatives undertaken by Polish local governments to support entrepreneurship. The research was based on survey and statistical tools and stepwise regression analysis. In the paper, bottom-up initiatives undertaken by local governments (such as organizing events at the national or regional scale that enable networking among entrepreneurs or establishing departments for supporting local entrepreneurship that offer cooperation with local entrepreneurs) were found to influence the number of entrepreneurs active in local government territories. The paper concludes that local governments and their bottom-up activities are an important factor influencing local entrepreneurship development. The presented research results have implications for policy makers and may be useful for local governments in Poland and in other countries in the context of supporting entrepreneurship by undertaking bottom-up initiatives at the local level.

Suggested Citation

  • Niki Derlukiewicz & Anna Mempel-Śnieżyk & Tomasz Pilewicz & Małgorzata Godlewska, 2021. "Bottom-Up Initiatives Undertaken by Local Governments to Support Entrepreneurship," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-19, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:19:p:6328-:d:649617
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/19/6328/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/19/6328/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Odysseas Moschidis & Vasileios Ismyrlis, 2018. "Citizens' Participation in Local Economic Development and Administration: An Exploratory Statistical Analysis," South-Eastern Europe Journal of Economics, Association of Economic Universities of South and Eastern Europe and the Black Sea Region, vol. 16(1), pages 35-54.
    2. Zoltán J. Ács & László Szerb & Esteban Lafuente & Ainsley Lloyd, 2018. "The Global Entrepreneurship and Development Index," SpringerBriefs in Economics, in: Global Entrepreneurship and Development Index 2018, chapter 0, pages 21-37, Springer.
    3. Ma³gorzata Jab³oñska & Joanna, 2020. "The key factors affecting entrepreneurship: a comparative analysis," Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta u Rijeci/Proceedings of Rijeka Faculty of Economics, University of Rijeka, Faculty of Economics and Business, vol. 38(1), pages 125-146.
    4. Andr�s Rodr�guez-Pose, 2013. "Do Institutions Matter for Regional Development?," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(7), pages 1034-1047, July.
    5. Michał Bernard Pietrzak & Bartłomiej Igliński & Wojciech Kujawski & Paweł Iwański, 2021. "Energy Transition in Poland—Assessment of the Renewable Energy Sector," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-23, April.
    6. Justyna Przywojska, 2021. "Polish Local Government’s Perspective on Revitalisation: A Framework for Future Socially Sustainable Solutions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-19, August.
    7. Randolph Luca Bruno & Maria Bytchkova & Saul Estrin, 2013. "Institutional Determinants of New Firm Entry in Russia: A Cross-Regional Analysis," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 95(5), pages 1740-1749, December.
    8. Renata Marks-Bielska & Stanisław Bielski & Anastasija Novikova & Kęstutis Romaneckas, 2019. "Straw Stocks as a Source of Renewable Energy. A Case Study of a District in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-18, August.
    9. Carmen Camarero Izquierdo & Carlos Hernández Carrión & Sonia San Martín Gutiérrez, 2008. "Developing relationships within the framework of local economic development in Spain," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(1), pages 41-65, January.
    10. Sunny Li Sun & Weilei (Stone) Shi & David Ahlstrom & Li (Rachel) Tian, 2020. "Understanding institutions and entrepreneurship: The microfoundations lens and emerging economies," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 37(4), pages 957-979, December.
    11. Zoltan J. Acs & László Szerb & Erkko Autio, 2016. "Enhancing Entrepreneurship Ecosystems. A “Systems of Entrepreneurship” Approach to Entrepreneurship Policy," SpringerBriefs in Economics, in: Global Entrepreneurship and Development Index 2015, edition 1, chapter 0, pages 57-69, Springer.
    12. Dennis Patrick Leyden, 2016. "Public-sector entrepreneurship and the creation of a sustainable innovative economy," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 46(4), pages 553-564, April.
    13. Joanna Rakowska & Irena Ozimek, 2021. "Renewable Energy Attitudes and Behaviour of Local Governments in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-17, May.
    14. Aleksander Jakimowicz & Daniel Rzeczkowski, 2021. "The Impact of Public Administration Digitalization on the Decarbonization of the Economy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-45, September.
    15. Leyden, Dennis Patrick & Link, Albert N., 2015. "Public Sector Entrepreneurship: U.S. Technology and Innovation Policy," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199313853.
    16. Niki Derlukiewicz & Anna Mempel-Sniezyk & Dominika Mankowska, 2021. "Development of Innovation Economy - Activity of Local Government in Poland," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 175-195.
    17. Magdalena Wójcik-Jurkiewicz & Marzena Czarnecka & Grzegorz Kinelski & Beata Sadowska & Katarzyna Bilińska-Reformat, 2021. "Determinants of Decarbonisation in the Transformation of the Energy Sector: The Case of Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-22, February.
    18. Dorota Domalewska, 2021. "A Longitudinal Analysis of the Creation of Environmental Identity and Attitudes towards Energy Sustainability Using the Framework of Identity Theory and Big Data Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-12, January.
    19. C. Agostinelli, 2002. "Robust stepwise regression," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(6), pages 825-840.
    20. Amy Rader Olsson & Hans Westlund & Johan P. Larsson, 2020. "Entrepreneurial Governance and Local Growth," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-16, May.
    21. Krystian Heffner & Brygida Klemens & Brygida Solga, 2019. "Challenges of Regional Development in the Context of Population Ageing. Analysis Based on the Example of Opolskie Voivodeship," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-23, September.
    22. Markku Sotarauta & Riina Pulkkinen, 2011. "Institutional Entrepreneurship for Knowledge Regions: In Search of a Fresh Set of Questions for Regional Innovation Studies," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 29(1), pages 96-112, February.
    23. Paweł Ziemba, 2020. "Multi-Criteria Stochastic Selection of Electric Vehicles for the Sustainable Development of Local Government and State Administration Units in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-19, November.
    24. T. Tohmo & H. Littunen & E. Storhammar, 2010. "Entrepreneurial And Regional Growth Activity In Finland," Journal of Enterprising Culture (JEC), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(02), pages 205-228.
    25. Zoltan J. Acs & László Szerb & Erkko Autio, 2016. "Global Entrepreneurship and Development Index 2015," SpringerBriefs in Economics, Springer, edition 1, number 978-3-319-26730-2, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Godlewska Malgorzata & Mackiewicz Marta, 2023. "Local context of local government participation in the innovation networks: Evidence from Poland," International Journal of Management and Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of World Economy, vol. 59(3), pages 243-263, September.
    2. Brygida Klemens & Brygida Solga & Krystian Heffner & Piotr Gibas, 2022. "Environmental and Energy Conditions in Sustainable Regional Development," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-26, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. László Szerb & Éva Komlósi & Balázs Páger, 2016. "Measuring Entrepreneurship and Optimizing Entrepreneurship Policy Efforts in the European Union," ifo DICE Report, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 14(03), pages 08-23, October.
    2. repec:ces:ifodic:v:14:y:2016:i:3:p:19255694 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Zoltán J. Acs & David B. Audretsch & Erik E. Lehmann & Georg Licht, 2017. "National systems of innovation," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 42(5), pages 997-1008, October.
    4. László Szerb & Éva Komlósi & Balázs Páger, 2016. "Measuring Entrepreneurship and Optimizing Entrepreneurship Policy Efforts in the European Union," ifo DICE Report, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 14(3), pages 08-23, October.
    5. Nir Kshetri, 2023. "The nature and sources of international variation in formal institutions related to initial coin offerings: preliminary findings and a research agenda," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 9(1), pages 1-38, December.
    6. James A. Cunningham & Paul O’Reilly, 2018. "Macro, meso and micro perspectives of technology transfer," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 43(3), pages 545-557, June.
    7. Mabel Pisá-Bó & José Fernando López-Muñoz & Josefina Novejarque-Civera, 2021. "The ever-changing socioeconomic conditions for entrepreneurship," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 1335-1355, September.
    8. Grégory Guéneau & Didier Chabaud & Marie-Christine Chalus Sauvannet, 2022. "Opening entrepreneurial ecosystem’s black box: the power of networks in African low-income countries," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 753-772, June.
    9. Zoltán J. Acs & David B. Audretsch & Erik E. Lehmann & Georg Licht, 2016. "National systems of entrepreneurship," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 46(4), pages 527-535, April.
    10. Lopes João & Antunes Helder & Rodrigues Ricardo, 2018. "Comparative Entrepreneurship between Western Europe and Latin America," Entrepreneurship Research Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 8(4), pages 1-20, October.
    11. Naudé, Wim, 2024. "Entrepreneurship Is Dangerously Obsessed with Growth and Incompatible with Current Visions of a Post-growth Society," IZA Discussion Papers 17158, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    12. Daniel Nepelski & Giuseppe Piroli, 2018. "Organizational diversity and innovation potential of EU-funded research projects," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 43(3), pages 615-639, June.
    13. Nicola Cortinovis & Jing Xiao & Ron Boschma & Frank G van Oort, 2017. "Quality of government and social capital as drivers of regional diversification in Europe," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 17(6), pages 1179-1208.
    14. Kai Du & Allan O’Connor, 2018. "Entrepreneurship and advancing national level economic efficiency," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 50(1), pages 91-111, January.
    15. Erik E. Lehmann & Nikolaus Seitz, 2017. "Freedom and innovation: a country and state level analysis," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 42(5), pages 1009-1029, October.
    16. Ivana Đaković Radojičić & Jelena Raut & Slavica Mitrović Veljković & Branislav Dudić & Silvia Treľová & Vijoleta Vrhovac, 2022. "Factors That Limit the Development of the Digital Entrepreneurial System in the Scale-Up Phase of the Enterprise Life Cycle," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-18, May.
    17. Jitendra Parajuli & Kingsley E. Haynes, 2017. "Panel Data Models of New Firm Formation in New England," REGION, European Regional Science Association, vol. 4, pages 65-76.
    18. Mohamed Abouelhassan Ali & Moaaz Kabil & Rahaf Alayan & Róbert Magda & Lóránt Dénes Dávid, 2021. "Entrepreneurship Ecosystem Performance in Egypt: An Empirical Study Based on the Global Entrepreneurship Index (GEI)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-22, June.
    19. Silviu Nate & Valentin Grecu & Andriy Stavytskyy & Ganna Kharlamova, 2022. "Fostering Entrepreneurial Ecosystems through the Stimulation and Mentorship of New Entrepreneurs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-18, June.
    20. Dora Gicheva & Albert N. Link, 2022. "Public sector entrepreneurship, politics, and innovation," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 59(2), pages 565-572, August.
    21. Conor O’Kane & James A. Cunningham & Matthias Menter & Sara Walton, 2021. "The brokering role of technology transfer offices within entrepreneurial ecosystems: an investigation of macro–meso–micro factors," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 46(6), pages 1814-1844, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:19:p:6328-:d:649617. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.