IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i14p4100-d590093.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Decision-Making Processes in Controlling Exposure to Sunlight Supported by Simulation Tools: A Case Study in Warm Weather

Author

Listed:
  • Mariana Huskinson

    (Department of Architectural Constructions, University of Alicante, 03690 San Vicente del Raspeig (Alicante), Spain)

  • Antonio Galiano-Garrigós

    (Department of Architectural Constructions, University of Alicante, 03690 San Vicente del Raspeig (Alicante), Spain)

  • Ángel Benigno González-Avilés

    (Department of Architectural Constructions, University of Alicante, 03690 San Vicente del Raspeig (Alicante), Spain)

  • M. Isabel Pérez-Millán

    (Department of Architectural Constructions, University of Alicante, 03690 San Vicente del Raspeig (Alicante), Spain)

Abstract

Improving the energy performance of existing buildings is one of the main strategies defined by the European Union to reduce global energy costs. Amongst the actions to be carried out in buildings to achieve this objective is working with passive measures adapted to each type of climate. To assist designers in the process of finding appropriate solutions for each building and location, different tools have been developed and since the implementation of building information modeling (BIM), it has been possible to perform an analysis of a building’s life cycle from an energy perspective and other types of analysis such as a comfort analysis. In the case of Spain, the first BIM environment tool has been implemented that deals with the global analysis of a building’s behavior and serves as an alternative to previous methods characterized by their lack of both flexibility and information offered to designers. This paper evaluates and compares the official Spanish energy performance evaluation tool (Cypetherm) released in 2018 using a case study involving the installation of sunlight control devices as part of a building refurbishment. It is intended to determine how databases and simplifications affect the designer’s decision-making. Additionally, the yielded energy results are complemented by a comfort analysis to explore the impact of these improvements from a users’ wellbeing viewpoint. At the end of the process the yielded results still confirm that the simulation remains far from reality and that simulation tools can indeed influence the decision-making process.

Suggested Citation

  • Mariana Huskinson & Antonio Galiano-Garrigós & Ángel Benigno González-Avilés & M. Isabel Pérez-Millán, 2021. "Decision-Making Processes in Controlling Exposure to Sunlight Supported by Simulation Tools: A Case Study in Warm Weather," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-30, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:14:p:4100-:d:590093
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/14/4100/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/14/4100/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Méndez Echenagucia, Tomás & Capozzoli, Alfonso & Cascone, Ylenia & Sassone, Mario, 2015. "The early design stage of a building envelope: Multi-objective search through heating, cooling and lighting energy performance analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 577-591.
    2. Luca Evangelisti & Gabriele Battista & Claudia Guattari & Carmine Basilicata & Roberto De Lieto Vollaro, 2014. "Influence of the Thermal Inertia in the European Simplified Procedures for the Assessment of Buildings’ Energy Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(7), pages 1-11, July.
    3. Baloch, Ashfaque Ahmed & Shaikh, Pervez Hameed & Shaikh, Faheemullah & Leghari, Zohaib Hussain & Mirjat, Nayyar Hussain & Uqaili, Muhammad Aslam, 2018. "Simulation tools application for artificial lighting in buildings," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 3007-3026.
    4. Andaloro, Antonio P.F. & Salomone, Roberta & Ioppolo, Giuseppe & Andaloro, Laura, 2010. "Energy certification of buildings: A comparative analysis of progress towards implementation in European countries," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(10), pages 5840-5866, October.
    5. Rodrigues, Eugénio & Fernandes, Marco S., 2020. "Overheating risk in Mediterranean residential buildings: Comparison of current and future climate scenarios," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    6. Babak Raji & Martin J. Tenpierik & Andy Van den Dobbelsteen, 2017. "Early-Stage Design Considerations for the Energy-Efficiency of High-Rise Office Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-28, April.
    7. Munarim, Ulisses & Ghisi, Enedir, 2016. "Environmental feasibility of heritage buildings rehabilitation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 235-249.
    8. Samuel Domínguez & Juan J. Sendra & Angel L. León & Paula M. Esquivias, 2012. "Towards Energy Demand Reduction in Social Housing Buildings: Envelope System Optimization Strategies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 5(7), pages 1-25, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Verbeke, Stijn & Audenaert, Amaryllis, 2018. "Thermal inertia in buildings: A review of impacts across climate and building use," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 2300-2318.
    2. Rafał Krupiński, 2020. "Virtual Reality System and Scientific Visualisation for Smart Designing and Evaluating of Lighting," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-17, October.
    3. Giacomo Chiesa & Andrea Acquaviva & Mario Grosso & Lorenzo Bottaccioli & Maurizio Floridia & Edoardo Pristeri & Edoardo Maria Sanna, 2019. "Parametric Optimization of Window-to-Wall Ratio for Passive Buildings Adopting A Scripting Methodology to Dynamic-Energy Simulation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-30, May.
    4. Saurbayeva, Assemgul & Memon, Shazim Ali & Kim, Jong, 2023. "Integrated multi-stage sensitivity analysis and multi-objective optimization approach for PCM integrated residential buildings in different climate zones," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(PB).
    5. Ascione, Fabrizio & De Masi, Rosa Francesca & de Rossi, Filippo & Ruggiero, Silvia & Vanoli, Giuseppe Peter, 2016. "Optimization of building envelope design for nZEBs in Mediterranean climate: Performance analysis of residential case study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 938-957.
    6. Jesica Fernández-Agüera & Samuel Dominguez-Amarillo & Marco Fornaciari & Fabio Orlandi, 2019. "TVOCs and PM 2.5 in Naturally Ventilated Homes: Three Case Studies in a Mild Climate," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-22, November.
    7. Fernandes, Marco S. & Rodrigues, Eugénio & Gaspar, Adélio Rodrigues & Costa, José J. & Gomes, Álvaro, 2019. "The impact of thermal transmittance variation on building design in the Mediterranean region," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 581-597.
    8. Shengyuan Guo & Wanjiang Wang & Yihuan Zhou, 2022. "Research on Energy Saving and Economy of Old Buildings Based on Parametric Design: A Case Study of a Hospital in Linyi City, Shandong Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-20, December.
    9. Mehdi Taebnia & Sander Toomla & Lauri Leppä & Jarek Kurnitski, 2019. "Air Distribution and Air Handling Unit Configuration Effects on Energy Performance in an Air-Heated Ice Rink Arena," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, February.
    10. Francisco Sanhueza-Durán & José M. Gómez-Soberón & Claudia Valderrama-Ulloa & Felipe Ossio, 2019. "A Comparison of Energy Efficiency Certification in Housing: A Study of the Chilean and Spanish Cases," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-16, September.
    11. Pajek, Luka & Košir, Mitja, 2021. "Strategy for achieving long-term energy efficiency of European single-family buildings through passive climate adaptation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 297(C).
    12. Ana Ogando-Martínez & Javier López-Gómez & Lara Febrero-Garrido, 2018. "Maintenance Factor Identification in Outdoor Lighting Installations Using Simulation and Optimization Techniques," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-13, August.
    13. Taveres-Cachat, Ellika & Lobaccaro, Gabriele & Goia, Francesco & Chaudhary, Gaurav, 2019. "A methodology to improve the performance of PV integrated shading devices using multi-objective optimization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 247(C), pages 731-744.
    14. Lin, Yu-Hao & Tsai, Kang-Ting & Lin, Min-Der & Yang, Ming-Der, 2016. "Design optimization of office building envelope configurations for energy conservation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 336-346.
    15. García Kerdan, Iván & Raslan, Rokia & Ruyssevelt, Paul & Morillón Gálvez, David, 2017. "A comparison of an energy/economic-based against an exergoeconomic-based multi-objective optimisation for low carbon building energy design," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 244-263.
    16. Jiayue Yu & Xinyue Ma & Teng Fei, 2024. "Impact of Spatial Layout Design on Energy Consumption of Ice Rinks in Cold Regions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-19, September.
    17. Nayara R. M. Sakiyama & Joyce C. Carlo & Leonardo Mazzaferro & Harald Garrecht, 2021. "Building Optimization through a Parametric Design Platform: Using Sensitivity Analysis to Improve a Radial-Based Algorithm Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-25, May.
    18. Dario Cottafava & Giulia Sonetti & Paolo Gambino & Andrea Tartaglino, 2018. "Explorative Multidimensional Analysis for Energy Efficiency: DataViz versus Clustering Algorithms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-18, May.
    19. Likai Wang & Patrick Janssen & Kian Wee Chen & Ziyu Tong & Guohua Ji, 2019. "Subtractive Building Massing for Performance-Based Architectural Design Exploration: A Case Study of Daylighting Optimization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-20, December.
    20. Pilar Mercader-Moyano & Manuel Ramos-Martín, 2020. "Comprehensive Sustainability Assessment of Regenerative Actions on the Thermal Envelope of Obsolete Buildings under Climate Change Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-40, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:14:p:4100-:d:590093. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.