IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i13p3981-d587474.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Corporate Social Responsibility of Water and Sanitation Company in the Czech Republic—Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Elzbieta Pawlowska

    (Institute of Management and Logistics, Faculty of Organization and Management, Silesian University of Technology, Roosevelta 26, 41-800 Zabrze, Poland)

  • Joanna Machnik-Slomka

    (Institute of Management and Logistics, Faculty of Organization and Management, Silesian University of Technology, Roosevelta 26, 41-800 Zabrze, Poland)

  • Iwona Klosok-Bazan

    (Department of Thermal Engineering and Industrial Facilities, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Opole University of Technology, Mikolajczyka 5, 45-271 Opole, Poland)

  • Miroslava Gono

    (Department of Electrical Power Engineering, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, VSB—Technical University of Ostrava, 17. listopadu 2172/15, 708 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic)

  • Radomir Gono

    (Department of Electrical Power Engineering, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, VSB—Technical University of Ostrava, 17. listopadu 2172/15, 708 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic)

Abstract

The issue discussed in this article concerns corporate social responsibility (CSR), which is playing an increasingly important role in the context of sustainable development of enterprises. The purpose of the current work was to assess the practices applied in the area of corporate social responsibility in water and sanitation companies, based on the opinions of employees and managers. The motivation for undertaking research on this topic resulted from the scarcity of scientific studies on the measurement of the corporate social responsibility concept in water and sanitization companies using a multidimensional approach based on the ISO 26000 standard. The study used methodological triangulation based on the use of qualitative and quantitative research methods to verify information from different sources. This approach allowed the authors to obtain the data more effectively and analyze the problem from numerous different perspectives. The study used an interview method that targeted water and sanitization utility staff. In-depth research was based on the case study method, which is particularly important when researching complex phenomena. For this purpose, surveys were carried out, the results of which indicate that corporate social responsibility of the surveyed enterprise is at a high level, and that there are statistically significant differences between individual dimensions of CSR. The results indicate that the surveyed company is oriented towards supporting activities in the area of corporate social responsibility, in accordance with the in the concept of sustainable development.

Suggested Citation

  • Elzbieta Pawlowska & Joanna Machnik-Slomka & Iwona Klosok-Bazan & Miroslava Gono & Radomir Gono, 2021. "Corporate Social Responsibility of Water and Sanitation Company in the Czech Republic—Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-24, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:13:p:3981-:d:587474
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/13/3981/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/13/3981/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marzena Kramarz & Lilla Knop & Edyta Przybylska & Katarzyna Dohn, 2021. "Stakeholders of the Multimodal Freight Transport Ecosystem in Polish–Czech–Slovak Cross-Border Area," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-32, April.
    2. Manuel Branco & Lúcia Rodrigues, 2006. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Resource-Based Perspectives," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 69(2), pages 111-132, December.
    3. Ewa Stawiarska & Paweł Sobczak, 2018. "The Impact of Intelligent Transportation System Implementations on the Sustainable Growth of Passenger Transport in EU Regions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-32, April.
    4. Rui Albuquerque & Yrjö Koskinen & Chendi Zhang, 2019. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Risk: Theory and Empirical Evidence," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(10), pages 4451-4469, October.
    5. Assâad El Akremi & Jean-Pascal Gond & Valérie Swaen & Kenneth de Roeck & Jacques Igalens, 2018. "How Do Employees Perceive Corporate Responsibility? Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Corporate Stakeholder Responsibility Scale," Post-Print halshs-01520959, HAL.
    6. Jacob Hale & Suzanna Long, 2020. "A Time Series Sustainability Assessment of a Partial Energy Portfolio Transition," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.
    7. Xiaojuan Wu & Dana Dluhošová & Zdeněk Zmeškal, 2021. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Profitability: The Moderating Role of Firm Type in Chinese Appliance Listed Companies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, January.
    8. Michaela Balzarova & Pavel Castka, 2012. "Stakeholders’ Influence and Contribution to Social Standards Development: The Case of Multiple Stakeholder Approach to ISO 26000 Development," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 111(2), pages 265-279, December.
    9. Jia Xu & Jiuchang Wei & Liangdong Lu, 2019. "Strategic stakeholder management, environmental corporate social responsibility engagement, and financial performance of stigmatized firms derived from Chinese special environmental policy," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(6), pages 1027-1044, September.
    10. Chang, Rui-Dong & Zuo, Jian & Zhao, Zhen-Yu & Zillante, George & Gan, Xiao-Long & Soebarto, Veronica, 2017. "Evolving theories of sustainability and firms: History, future directions and implications for renewable energy research," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 48-56.
    11. Zelong Wei & Xi Song & Zohaib Hussain Makhdoom & Paike Xie, 2019. "Paradox strategic cognition and ECSR in China: a three-tripod perspective," Asia Pacific Business Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(3), pages 392-412, May.
    12. Jaffar Abbas & Shahid Mahmood & Hashim Ali & Muhammad Ali Raza & Ghaffar Ali & Jaffar Aman & Shaher Bano & Mohammad Nurunnabi, 2019. "The Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility Practices and Environmental Factors through a Moderating Role of Social Media Marketing on Sustainable Performance of Business Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-33, June.
    13. Bożena Gajdzik & Sandra Grabowska & Sebastian Saniuk & Tadeusz Wieczorek, 2020. "Sustainable Development and Industry 4.0: A Bibliometric Analysis Identifying Key Scientific Problems of the Sustainable Industry 4.0," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-27, August.
    14. Shen, Chung-Hua & Wu, Meng-Wen & Chen, Ting-Hsuan & Fang, Hao, 2016. "To engage or not to engage in corporate social responsibility: Empirical evidence from global banking sector," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 207-225.
    15. Radosław Wolniak & Adam Wyszomirski & Marcin Olkiewicz & Anna Olkiewicz, 2021. "Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility Activities in Heating Industry—Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-19, March.
    16. Aliyu Baba Usman & Noor Afza Binti Amran, 2015. "Corporate social responsibility practice and corporate financial performance: evidence from Nigeria companies," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 11(4), pages 749-763, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lijuan Wu & Shanyue Jin, 2022. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability: From a Corporate Governance Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-15, November.
    2. Petr Petera & Jaroslav Wagner & Renáta Pakšiová, 2021. "The Influence of Environmental Strategy, Environmental Reporting and Environmental Management Control System on Environmental and Economic Performance," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-20, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Radosław Wolniak & Adam Wyszomirski & Marcin Olkiewicz & Anna Olkiewicz, 2021. "Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility Activities in Heating Industry—Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-19, March.
    2. Francesco Gangi & Antonio Meles & Eugenio D'Angelo & Lucia Michela Daniele, 2019. "Sustainable development and corporate governance in the financial system: Are environmentally friendly banks less risky?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(3), pages 529-547, May.
    3. Mario Morales-Parragué & Luis Araya-Castillo & Fidel Molina-Luque & Hugo Moraga-Flores, 2022. "Scientometric Analysis of Research on Corporate Social Responsibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-22, February.
    4. Curcio, Domenico & Gianfrancesco, Igor & Onorato, Grazia & Vioto, Davide, 2024. "Do ESG scores affect financial systemic risk? Evidence from European banks and insurers," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    5. Faisal Mahmood & Faisal Qadeer & Usman Sattar & Antonio Ariza-Montes & Maria Saleem & Jaffar Aman, 2020. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Firms’ Financial Performance: A New Insight," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-19, May.
    6. Paraskevi (Evi) Dekoulou & Anna Anastasopoulou & Panagiotis Trivellas, 2023. "Employee Performance Implications of CSR for Organizational Resilience in the Banking Industry: The Mediation Role of Psychological Empowerment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-20, August.
    7. Marc Kouzez & Ji-Yong Lee & Jomana Leroux, 2024. "Investment in ESG activities and bank performance: does bank ownership matter?," Post-Print hal-03859287, HAL.
    8. Hyo Jung (Julie) Chang & Nasir Rakib & Jaehan Min, 2023. "An Exploration of Transformative Learning Applied to the Triple Bottom Line of Sustainability for Fashion Consumers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-14, June.
    9. Ho, Ly & Bai, Min & Lu, Yue & Qin, Yafeng, 2021. "The effect of corporate sustainability performance on leverage adjustments," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 53(5).
    10. Belasri, Sanaa & Gomes, Mathieu & Pijourlet, Guillaume, 2020. "Corporate social responsibility and bank efficiency," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    11. Tingting Hu & Kun You & Char-Lee Lok, 2025. "State ownership, political connection and ESG performance," Risk Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(1), pages 1-33, January.
    12. Maria Celia López-Penabad & Ana Iglesias-Casal & José Fernando Silva Neto & José Manuel Maside-Sanfiz, 2023. "Does corporate social performance improve bank efficiency? Evidence from European banks," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 1399-1437, May.
    13. Hiller, Victor & Raffin, Natacha, 2020. "Firms’ social responsibility and workers’ motivation at the industry equilibrium," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 131-149.
    14. Cao Thi Mien Thuy & Nguyen Vinh Khuong & Nguyen Thanh Liem, 2021. "Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure and Its Effect on Firm Risk: An Empirical Research on Vietnamese Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-13, November.
    15. Harsha Sarvaiya & Gabriel Eweje & Jim Arrowsmith, 2018. "The Roles of HRM in CSR: Strategic Partnership or Operational Support?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 153(3), pages 825-837, December.
    16. Md Mosharraf Hossain & Lafang Wang & Jing Yu, 2024. "The reputational costs of corporate environmental underperformance: evidence from China," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 930-948, February.
    17. Mario La Torre & Sabrina Leo & Ida Claudia Panetta, 2021. "Banks and environmental, social and governance drivers: Follow the market or the authorities?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(6), pages 1620-1634, November.
    18. Paola Brighi & Antonio Carlo Francesco Della Bina & Valeria Venturelli, 2022. "Do ESG Investments Mitigate ESG Controversies? Evidence From International Data," Centro Studi di Banca e Finanza (CEFIN) (Center for Studies in Banking and Finance) 0084, Universita di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Dipartimento di Economia "Marco Biagi".
    19. Saif-Alyousfi, Abdulazeez Y.H. & Saha, Asish & Alshammari, Turki Rashed, 2023. "Bank diversification and ESG activities: A global perspective," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 47(3).
    20. Jyotirani Gupta & Niladri Das, 2022. "Multidimensional corporate social responsibility disclosure and financial performance: A meta‐analytical review," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(4), pages 731-748, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:13:p:3981-:d:587474. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.