IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i12p3618-d576912.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Metaheuristics and Transmission Expansion Planning: A Comparative Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Hamdi Abdi

    (Electrical Engineering Department, Engineering Faculty, Razi University, Kermanshah 67144-14971, Iran)

  • Mansour Moradi

    (Young Researchers and Elite Club, Kermanshah Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kermanshah 67189-97551, Iran)

  • Sara Lumbreras

    (Institute for Research in Technology, Universidad Pontificia Comillas, 28015 Madrid, Spain)

Abstract

Transmission expansion planning (TEP), the determination of new transmission lines to be added to an existing power network, is a key element in power system planning. Using classical optimization to define the most suitable reinforcements is the most desirable alternative. However, the extent of the under-study problems is growing, because of the uncertainties introduced by renewable generation or electric vehicles (EVs) and the larger sizes under consideration given the trends for higher renewable shares and stronger market integration. This means that classical optimization, even using efficient techniques, such as stochastic decomposition, can have issues when solving large-sized problems. This is compounded by the fact that, in many cases, it is necessary to solve a large number of instances of a problem in order to incorporate further considerations. Thus, it can be interesting to resort to metaheuristics, which can offer quick solutions at the expense of an optimality guarantee. Metaheuristics can even be combined with classical optimization to try to extract the best of both worlds. There is a vast literature that tests individual metaheuristics on specific case studies, but wide comparisons are missing. In this paper, a genetic algorithm (GA), orthogonal crossover based differential evolution (OXDE), grey wolf optimizer (GWO), moth–flame optimization (MFO), exchange market algorithm (EMA), sine cosine algorithm (SCA) optimization and imperialistic competitive algorithm (ICA) are tested and compared. The algorithms are applied to the standard test systems of IEEE 24, and 118 buses. Results indicate that, although all metaheuristics are effective, they have diverging profiles in terms of computational time and finding optimal plans for TEP.

Suggested Citation

  • Hamdi Abdi & Mansour Moradi & Sara Lumbreras, 2021. "Metaheuristics and Transmission Expansion Planning: A Comparative Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-23, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:12:p:3618-:d:576912
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/12/3618/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/12/3618/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hemmati, Reza & Hooshmand, Rahmat-Allah & Khodabakhshian, Amin, 2014. "Market based transmission expansion and reactive power planning with consideration of wind and load uncertainties," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 1-10.
    2. Mustakerov, Ivan & Borissova, Daniela, 2010. "Wind turbines type and number choice using combinatorial optimization," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(9), pages 1887-1894.
    3. Sini Han & Hyeon-Jin Kim & Duehee Lee, 2020. "A Long-Term Evaluation on Transmission Line Expansion Planning with Multistage Stochastic Programming," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-18, April.
    4. Al-Hamouz, Zakariya Mahmoud & Al-Faraj, Ali Sadiq, 2003. "Transmission-expansion planning based on anon-linear programming algorithm," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 76(1-3), pages 169-177, September.
    5. Canizes, Bruno & Soares, João & Lezama, Fernando & Silva, Cátia & Vale, Zita & Corchado, Juan M., 2019. "Optimal expansion planning considering storage investment and seasonal effect of demand and renewable generation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 937-954.
    6. Camilo Andres Mora & Oscar Danilo Montoya & Edwin Rivas Trujillo, 2020. "Mixed-Integer Programming Model for Transmission Network Expansion Planning with Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-22, August.
    7. Ahmadi, Pouria & Rosen, Marc A. & Dincer, Ibrahim, 2012. "Multi-objective exergy-based optimization of a polygeneration energy system using an evolutionary algorithm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 21-31.
    8. Yuhong Wang & Lei Chen & Hong Zhou & Xu Zhou & Zongsheng Zheng & Qi Zeng & Li Jiang & Liang Lu, 2021. "Flexible Transmission Network Expansion Planning Based on DQN Algorithm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-21, April.
    9. Faezeh Akhavizadegan & Lizhi Wang & James McCalley, 2020. "Scenario Selection for Iterative Stochastic Transmission Expansion Planning," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-18, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Siripat Somchit & Palamy Thongbouasy & Chitchai Srithapon & Rongrit Chatthaworn, 2023. "Optimal Transmission Expansion Planning with Long-Term Solar Photovoltaic Generation Forecast," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-17, February.
    2. Marco Antonio Itaborahy Filho & Erickson Puchta & Marcella S. R. Martins & Thiago Antonini Alves & Yara de Souza Tadano & Fernanda Cristina Corrêa & Sergio Luiz Stevan & Hugo Valadares Siqueira & Maur, 2022. "Bio-Inspired Optimization Algorithms Applied to the GAPID Control of a Buck Converter," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-22, September.
    3. Muhyaddin Rawa, 2022. "Towards Avoiding Cascading Failures in Transmission Expansion Planning of Modern Active Power Systems Using Hybrid Snake-Sine Cosine Optimization Algorithm," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-25, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yilin Xie & Ying Xu, 2022. "Transmission Expansion Planning Considering Wind Power and Load Uncertainties," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-18, September.
    2. Altayib, Khalid & Dincer, Ibrahim, 2022. "Development of an integrated hydropower system with hydrogen and methanol production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    3. Ahmadi, Pouria & Dincer, Ibrahim & Rosen, Marc A., 2014. "Thermoeconomic multi-objective optimization of a novel biomass-based integrated energy system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 958-970.
    4. Dalibor Petković & Siti Hafizah Ab Hamid & Žarko Ćojbašić & Nenad T. Pavlović, 2014. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: Adapting project management method and ANFIS strategy for variables selection and analyzing wind turbine wake effect," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 74(2), pages 463-475, November.
    5. Bakhshmand, Sina Kazemi & Saray, Rahim Khoshbakhti & Bahlouli, Keyvan & Eftekhari, Hajar & Ebrahimi, Afshin, 2015. "Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of a triple-pressure combined cycle plant using evolutionary algorithm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P1), pages 555-567.
    6. Huang, Zishuo & Yu, Hang & Chu, Xiangyang & Peng, Zhenwei, 2018. "A novel optimization model based on game tree for multi-energy conversion systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 109-121.
    7. Golberg, Alexander, 2015. "Environmental exergonomics for sustainable design and analysis of energy systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 314-321.
    8. Nami, Hossein & Anvari-Moghaddam, Amjad, 2020. "Small-scale CCHP systems for waste heat recovery from cement plants: Thermodynamic, sustainability and economic implications," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    9. Xue, Jie & Yip, Tsz Leung & Wu, Bing & Wu, Chaozhong & van Gelder, P.H.A.J.M., 2021. "A novel fuzzy Bayesian network-based MADM model for offshore wind turbine selection in busy waterways: An application to a case in China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 897-917.
    10. Assareh, Ehsanolah & Mousavi Asl, Seyed Sajad & Agarwal, Neha & Ahmadinejad, Mehrdad & Ghodrat, Maryam & Lee, Moonyong, 2023. "New optimized configuration for a hybrid PVT solar/electrolyzer/absorption chiller system utilizing the response surface method as a machine learning technique and multi-objective optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 281(C).
    11. Jerez, S. & Thais, F. & Tobin, I. & Wild, M. & Colette, A. & Yiou, P. & Vautard, R., 2015. "The CLIMIX model: A tool to create and evaluate spatially-resolved scenarios of photovoltaic and wind power development," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 1-15.
    12. Wang, Longyan & Tan, Andy & Gu, Yuantong, 2016. "A novel control strategy approach to optimally design a wind farm layout," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 10-21.
    13. Gharagheizi, Farhad & Ilani-Kashkouli, Poorandokht & Mohammadi, Amir H. & Ramjugernath, Deresh, 2014. "A group contribution method for determination of the standard molar chemical exergy of organic compounds," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 288-297.
    14. Feng, Ju & Shen, Wen Zhong, 2017. "Design optimization of offshore wind farms with multiple types of wind turbines," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 1283-1297.
    15. S. Mohammad S. Mahmoudi & Sina Salehi & Mortaza Yari & Marc A. Rosen, 2017. "Exergoeconomic Performance Comparison and Optimization of Single-Stage Absorption Heat Transformers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-28, April.
    16. Mauser, Ingo & Müller, Jan & Allerding, Florian & Schmeck, Hartmut, 2016. "Adaptive building energy management with multiple commodities and flexible evolutionary optimization," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(P2), pages 911-921.
    17. Song, Tangnyu & Huang, Guohe & Zhou, Xiong & Wang, Xiuquan, 2018. "An inexact two-stage fractional energy systems planning model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 275-289.
    18. Diaz-Mendez, S.E. & Sierra-Grajeda, J.M.T. & Hernandez-Guerrero, A. & Rodriguez-Lelis, J.M., 2013. "Entropy generation as an environmental impact indicator and a sample application to freshwater ecosystems eutrophication," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 234-239.
    19. Ashkan Abdalisousan & Maryam Fani & Bijan Farhanieh & Majid Abbaspour, 2014. "Effect of Decision Variables in the Steam Section for the Exergoeconomic Analysis of TCCGT Power Plant: A Case Study," Energy & Environment, , vol. 25(8), pages 1381-1404, December.
    20. Gabrielli, Paolo & Gazzani, Matteo & Martelli, Emanuele & Mazzotti, Marco, 2018. "Optimal design of multi-energy systems with seasonal storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(C), pages 408-424.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:12:p:3618-:d:576912. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.