IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2020i1p106-d469185.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Study on the Impact Pressure of Swirling-Round Supercritical CO 2 Jet Flow and Its Influencing Factors

Author

Listed:
  • Yulong Yang

    (Unconventional Petroleum Research Institute, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102200, China)

  • Han Liu

    (Engineering & Design Institute of CPOE, Offshore Engineering Company Ltd., CNPC, Beijing 100028, China)

  • Weixuan Mao

    (National Computer Network Emergency Response Technical Team, Coordination Center of China, Beijing 100029, China)

  • Zhaojie Song

    (Unconventional Petroleum Research Institute, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102200, China)

  • Haizhu Wang

    (College of Petroleum Engineering, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102200, China)

Abstract

Supercritical carbon dioxide (SC-CO 2 ) jet is capable of decreasing the threshold pressure of rock breakage and mitigating formation damage, owing to its low viscosity, high diffusivity, and extremely-low surface tension. The swirling-round jet holds the advantages of both a swirling jet and a round jet. Therefore, the comprehensive technique, swirling-round SC-CO 2 (SR-SC-CO 2 ) jet, is expected to substantially enhance rock-breaking efficiency. However, theoretical analysis of the flow field characteristics of SR-SC-CO 2 has not been reported yet. This work aims to lay a theoretical foundation for employing SR-SC-CO 2 in drilling and fracturing. The flow field is simulated using Naiver-Stokes equations and the RNG k-ε turbulence model. Sensitivity analysis, regarding pressure drop of the nozzle, confining pressure, fluid temperature, jetting distance, the diameter of the nozzle’s central hole, and grooving area, are performed. We show that the combined swirling-round SC-CO 2 jet flow could maintain a relatively larger axial as well as tangential velocity compared to a single approach of swirling jet or round jet, enabling one to acquire a deeper oillet and expand the perforation area effectively. The simulation results substantiate the enormous potential of SR-SC-CO 2 in improving rock-breaking efficiency and clarify the influence of relevant parameters on the impact pressure of the jet flow.

Suggested Citation

  • Yulong Yang & Han Liu & Weixuan Mao & Zhaojie Song & Haizhu Wang, 2020. "Study on the Impact Pressure of Swirling-Round Supercritical CO 2 Jet Flow and Its Influencing Factors," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2020:i:1:p:106-:d:469185
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/1/106/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/1/106/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Muhammad Ali & Husna Hayati Jarni & Adnan Aftab & Abdul Razak Ismail & Noori M. Cata Saady & Muhammad Faraz Sahito & Alireza Keshavarz & Stefan Iglauer & Mohammad Sarmadivaleh, 2020. "Nanomaterial-Based Drilling Fluids for Exploitation of Unconventional Reservoirs: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-30, July.
    2. Daniel J. Rozell & Sheldon J. Reaven, 2012. "Water Pollution Risk Associated with Natural Gas Extraction from the Marcellus Shale," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(8), pages 1382-1393, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liang Xu & Tao Yang & Yanhua Sun & Lei Xi & Jianmin Gao & Yunlong Li, 2021. "Flow and Heat Transfer Characteristics of a Swirling Impinging Jet Issuing from a Threaded Nozzle of 45 Degrees," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-26, December.
    2. Chao Pu & Zhenjian Liu & Ge Pu, 2022. "On the Factors of Impact Pressure in Supercritical CO 2 Phase-Transition Blasting—A Numerical Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-15, November.
    3. Shuaishuai Sun & Yongbin Wu & Xiaomei Ma & Pengcheng Liu & Fujian Zhang & Peng Liu & Xiaokun Zhang, 2023. "Feasibility and Mechanism of Deep Heavy Oil Recovery by CO 2 -Energized Fracturing Following N 2 Stimulation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-18, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Noura Abualfaraj & Patrick L. Gurian & Mira S. Olson, 2018. "Assessing Residential Exposure Risk from Spills of Flowback Water from Marcellus Shale Hydraulic Fracturing Activity," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-25, April.
    2. Shannon English & Joonghyeok Heo & Jaewoong Won, 2020. "Investigation of Sinkhole Formation with Human Influence: A Case Study from Wink Sink in Winkler County, Texas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-13, April.
    3. Camilo Andrés Guerrero-Martin & Angie Tatiana Ortega-Ramírez & Paula Alejandra Perilla Rodríguez & Shalom Jireth Reyes López & Laura Estefanía Guerrero-Martin & Raúl Salinas-Silva & Stefanny Camacho-G, 2023. "Analysis of Environmental Sustainability through a Weighting Matrix in the Oil and Gas Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-16, June.
    4. Klaudia Wilk, 2019. "Experimental and Simulation Studies of Energized Fracturing Fluid Efficiency in Tight Gas Formations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-17, November.
    5. Zuo, Na & Schieffer, Jack & Buck, Steven, 2019. "The effect of the oil and gas boom on schooling decisions in the U.S," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 1-23.
    6. Rengguang Liu & Yan Li & Tao Du & Shiming Zhou & Peiqing Lu & Yongliang Wang, 2022. "Insight into Class G Wellbore Cement Hydration and Mechanism at 150 °C Using Molecular Dynamics," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-14, August.
    7. Yang, Xianyu & Xie, Jingyu & Ye, Xiaoping & Chen, Shuya & Jiang, Guosheng & Cai, Jihua & Shi, Yanping & Yue, Ye & Xue, Man & Dai, Zhaokai & Fang, Changliang, 2023. "Sealing characteristics and discrete element fluid dynamics analysis of nanofiber in nanoscale shale pores: Modeling and prediction," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    8. Borivoje Pašić & Nediljka Gaurina-Međimurec & Petar Mijić & Igor Medved, 2020. "Experimental Research of Shale Pellet Swelling in Nano-Based Drilling Muds," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-17, November.
    9. Ilia Murtazashvili & Ennio E. Piano, 2019. "Governance of shale gas development: Insights from the Bloomington school of institutional analysis," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 32(2), pages 159-179, June.
    10. Lenhard, L.G. & Andersen, S.M. & Coimbra-Araújo, C.H., 2018. "Energy-Environmental Implications Of Shale Gas Exploration In Paraná Hydrological Basin, Brazil," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 56-69.
    11. Agostinho C. B. Junior & Raphael R. Silva & Giovanna L. R. Leal & Tarsila M. Tertuliano & Rafael P. Alves & Alfredo I. C. Garnica & Fabiola D. S. Curbelo, 2021. "The Influences of NP100 Surfactant and Pine-Oil Concentrations on Filtrate Volume and Filter-Cake Thickness of Microemulsion-Based Drilling Fluids (O/W)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-15, August.
    12. Noura Abualfaraj & Patrick L. Gurian & Mira S. Olson, 2018. "Frequency Analysis of Failure Scenarios from Shale Gas Development," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-13, April.
    13. Karen Maguire & John V. Winters, 2017. "Energy Boom and Gloom? Local Effects of Oil and Natural Gas Drilling on Subjective Well†Being," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(4), pages 590-610, December.
    14. Malin, Stephanie A. & Mayer, Adam & Crooks, James L. & McKenzie, Lisa & Peel, Jennifer L. & Adgate, John L., 2019. "Putting on partisan glasses: Political identity, quality of life, and oil and gas production in Colorado," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 738-748.
    15. Omid Mosalman Haghighi & Ghasem Zargar & Abbas Khaksar Manshad & Muhammad Ali & Mohammad Ali Takassi & Jagar A. Ali & Alireza Keshavarz, 2020. "Effect of Environment-Friendly Non-Ionic Surfactant on Interfacial Tension Reduction and Wettability Alteration; Implications for Enhanced Oil Recovery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-18, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2020:i:1:p:106-:d:469185. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.